Okay, all you good professors. One of your own has been looking for trouble
on the Spoons lists. I am coming over to PEN-L and give him what he asking
for. Glory hallelujah, I haven't had a good old fashioned flame war for the
longest time.
Louis Proyect
At 05:04 PM 2/10/97 -0500, you wrote:
The Sacramento Bee had an article over the week end. Business says it is
willing to hire more welfare recipients. All it wants in return is a
limit on wrongful dismissal suits. Sounds fair
Where is labor on all of this? Am I deaf or is the new radical labor
leadership silent?
--
Firstly, I have too much respect for this list to answer Proyect, the
anti-labor snitch, here. There will be (more) flames, but it will be on
the undead list called marxism-international where it belongs.
Secondly, I respect and admire Michael P and, for that reason also, will
not burden this
Barkely writes;
5) To bob malecki: One other thing that I warned you
about in my private post was that Michael Perelman runs
pen-l with a strong hand and does not tolerate what he
considers to be unacceptable behavior. Many have disagreed
with him on his policies, myself included at
SPECIAL ISSUE ON LOUIS PROYECT THE YELLOW JOURNALIST!
1. Confessions of and SWP reformist!
2. David vs Proyect!
3. Stuart vs Proyect
Confessions of and SWP reformist!
On Fri, 11 Oct 1996, Hugh Rodwell (on behalf of PO) wrote:
Nobody
I submit the following to M-I in Proyects own words. He has joined in the
withunt on Pen L to stop that horrible Malecki from publishing Cockroach two
times a week. It shows the real character of Proyect the neo Stalinist
yellow journalist. Once again the lies and slanders begin.
Hopefully
Hey, Michael, I don't wanna go to the mattresses. Just you and all the
other calm people over here and PEN-L try to get Levy off our backs. We
workers don't want to come over here and disrupt your proceedings. Try and
return the favor and rein Levy in and all will be cool. He doesn't object
to
I am sorry that the Malecki affair spilt out into pen-l. Malecki is now
gone and the war is over. Hopefully, Louis P. will continue to settle his
scores on the M-I list, although I confess that I find him amusing even
when he singles me out for his invective.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 12:21:02 -0500 (EST)
Subject: First Anniversary of U.S. Telecom Act
excerpted from today's New York Times:
INSTEAD OF FLOOD OF COMPETITION, THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT BROUGHT A TRICKLE
"Happy Birthday!" said Al Gore jauntily as he sat down
Concerning my long missive "NAIRU, etc.", Paul Phillips writes:
First, to Jim, my complaint was not specific to you but, as you know,
there is a similar discussion going on on PKT which is even less
progressive and I sort of conflated the two streams.
No problem, though I stopped reading PKT
I just want to make it clear that Berkeley Rosser doesn't describe the Bob
Malecki story with complete understanding. I was able to establish through
relentless probing that Bob and his confederates, by his own admission, were
charged with stockpiling dynamite to use against a power plant and in
BLS DAILY LABOR REPORT, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 1997
RELEASED TODAY:
EMPLOYMENT SITUATION -- Employment rose in January, and the
unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at 5.4 percent. The
number of nonfarm payroll jobs rose by 271,000 in January, after
seasonal adjustment. Total
During the late 1980s (when I last checked in on this), the US labor
movement began making a stink about the termination of overfunded
pension plans and the transfer of surpluses (morally the property of
workers) to employers, often for the express purpose of paying off debt
on LBOs. It was an
On Sat, 8 Feb 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear comrade Fatemi,
The email address of monthly review is [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you like I can
send you a copy of the article or even fax it if you are in a hurry. let me
know
michael yates
Dear Michael,
Many thanks for your kind email
When it comes to dealing with the outstanding problems, the
capitalist class cannot do it peacefully. Those who are profiting
from the existing arrangements strive to keep the status quo
through all means including by the use of force. Those who stand
to profit from changed arrangements do
Sorry (ooops! There I Go Again!!!) for taking time on
this, but I think the record needs to be set straight,
especially as I think that I am the only person besides bob
malecki on pen-l to have gone through the final stages of
the M-1 list. A few points:
1) It is a matter of
What is this all about? Why is this on pen-l? Why is pen-l being
proposed as a forum on which to conduct a "flame war'? Who cares
about petty sectarian squabbles like these?
Jim Craven
Date sent: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 12:48:18 -0800 (PST)
Send reply to:
17 matches
Mail list logo
