[PEN-L:424] Bargaining for Better Times - (please forward) -

1998-06-03 Thread Tom Walker
Simon Fraser Universtiy Centre for Labour Studies Presents: BARGAINING FOR BETTER TIMES A seminar by Tom Walker Shorter Work Time Network (Vancouver chapter) Tuesday, June 23, 1998 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm Simon Fraser University Harbour Centre Campus Room #1410 515 West Hastings Street Vancouver, B.

[PEN-L:415] Re: Blaug

1998-06-03 Thread Mathew Forstater
On Wed, 3 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have not seen Blaug's article, but it sounds like him. In person, he is > an abrasive figure, quick to pound on unsuspecting young economists. > > I also had lunch with him once. When the young black waitress asked him > how he would want his cof

[PEN-L:413] Re: Baumol and Becker

1998-06-03 Thread Mathew Forstater
And it also just had some other basic unforgivables. Like taking a production possibilities graph and putting savings on one axis and consumption on the other and portraying the economy as operating on the curve and arguing higher Japanese saving led to higher economic growth. Something like tha

[PEN-L:411] Re: Blaug article in Challenge

1998-06-03 Thread Mathew Forstater
Again, sorry if this already came up. Blaug has an article and interview in the recent Challenge really criticizing mainstream economics. It's not perfect--and he makes the bizarre claim if I read this right that Sraffian econ is postmodern!--but he attacks the mainstream journals, the mainstrea

[PEN-L:408] Re: Baumol and Becker

1998-06-03 Thread Mathew Forstater
I only recently resigned onto Pen-l so apologies if any of this came up already. Baumol had always struck me as *relatively* better than a lot of the younger neoclassicals. First, he seemed to be genuinely interested in Marx and history of economic thought, including the transformation problem,

[PEN-L:417] Re: Baumol and Becker

1998-06-03 Thread James Devine
At 10:11 PM 6/3/98 -0400, Mat wrote: >And it also just had some other basic unforgivables. Like taking a >production possibilities graph and putting savings on one axis and >consumption on the other and portraying the economy as operating on >the curve and arguing higher Japanese saving led to h

[PEN-L:416] Re: Blaug

1998-06-03 Thread michael
> Well, that's bizarre! Did he think that was funny? Was he trying to get > a reaction out of you? > We were with some very conservative economists who were also embarrassed. Maybe he thought that he was charming the young waitress. -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State U

[PEN-L:414] Blaug

1998-06-03 Thread michael
I have not seen Blaug's article, but it sounds like him. In person, he is an abrasive figure, quick to pound on unsuspecting young economists. I also had lunch with him once. When the young black waitress asked him how he would want his coffee, he answered, "black, just like my women." -- Mic

[PEN-L:412] Re: The Economic Meaning of Violence/2

1998-06-03 Thread James Devine
Mary King writes: > I've been inspired by an article by Donohue & Levitt (in the most recent AER conference proceedings issue) saying that violence is used when property rights are not legally enforceable. < I would say that it's decentralized, non-state, violence that's used when property righ

[PEN-L:410] Re: Baumol and Becker

1998-06-03 Thread michael
Baumol and Blinder was the text that first popularized Aggregate Supply/Aggregate Demand, a sin for which they should rot in hell. -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PEN-L:407] World financial situation unprecedented -- Robert Rubin (fwd)

1998-06-03 Thread michael
Forwarded message: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 17:14:31 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Sid Shniad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: World financial situation unprecedented -- Robert Rubin Associated Press

[PEN-L:406] NGOs say NO to MAI at WTO! (fwd)

1998-06-03 Thread michael
Forwarded message: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 17:31:22 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Sid Shniad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: NGOs say NO to MAI at WTO! >Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 17:49:47 -0400 (EDT) >From: Chantell Taylor <[EMAIL PROTEC

[PEN-L:405] a possible duplicate.on Russia's problems (fwd)

1998-06-03 Thread michael
Forwarded message: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: <@maine.rr.com> From: "Frank Durgin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: a possible duplicate.on Russia's problems Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 21:13:07 -0400 Michael: I stilll d

[PEN-L:403] Re: The Economic Meaning of Violence/2

1998-06-03 Thread Carrol Cox
It will be interesting to see what differences there are among responses to Mary's post on femecon-l, pen-l and m-fem (to which I fwd it from femecon-l) I would like to suggest two different perspectives which might be interesting to follow. The first would be through Engels's pamphlet, "The Role

[PEN-L:401] Re: IMF

1998-06-03 Thread Robert Naiman
My apologies!!! I plead guilty to non-definitition of a term and apologize for my hurried mistake. I plead not guilty to the Washington jargon charge -- this was PEN-l jargon. I guess no-one remembers the great PN/PI debate[s] on PEN-L over trade and globalization. No shared history I guess.

[PEN-L:404] Re: small victories

1998-06-03 Thread michael perelman
The anti-union initiative was defeated, but it cost $11 million. I am not sure that the result constitutes a victory when it costs so much. James Devine wrote: > 1. California's anti-union initiative seems to have been defeated. This may > help undermine similar initiatives in other US states. Y

[PEN-L:409] Labor unions flex muscles, defeat 226

1998-06-03 Thread Tim Stroshane
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=_1A4E57C9.EE8FE00D Forwarded mail received from: CENTER1:City:City.smtp:"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Cross-posted from

[PEN-L:402] Re: The Economic Meaning of Violence/2

1998-06-03 Thread Eugene P. Coyle
Mary King: I'm reading BIG TROUBLE by J. Anthony Lukas, about the trial of Big Bill Hayward and other leaders of the Western Federation of Miners for conspiracy to murder -- early in this century in Idaho. It has a lot of violence, in a very long and detailed book. One instance. The mi

[PEN-L:396] Re: Elementary Facts

1998-06-03 Thread Ricardo Duchesne
> Date sent: Wed, 27 May 1998 13:10:15 -0400 (EDT) > Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Shawgi Tell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: PROGRESSIVE SOCIOLOGISTS NETWORK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:Elementary Facts I don't think Tell sent this to pen-l. > > Gr

[PEN-L:393] Re: IMF $: a PN/PI call to arms

1998-06-03 Thread Wojtek Sokolowski
At 08:45 PM 6/2/98 -0500, Robert Naiman wrote: > >My purpose here is not to reignite the PN/PI debate, Pardon my ignorance, but what is the PN/PI debate? I understand that the use of bureaucratic newspeak, acronyms, shibboleths, jargon etc. among the punditry migh be desirable as en expressio

[PEN-L:395] Re: In Defense of History

1998-06-03 Thread Ricardo Duchesne
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: James Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:Re: realist postulate Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 09:58:48 -0700 Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This realist postulate is a postulate. That means that it can't be proven. But it seems a necessar

[PEN-L:392] BLS Daily Report

1998-06-03 Thread Richardson_D
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- =_NextPart_000_01BD8EFC.08186A80 BLS DAILY REPORT, TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 1998 Manufacturing growth slowed more than expected in May, with Asia's financial an

[PEN-L:400] small victories

1998-06-03 Thread James Devine
1. California's anti-union initiative seems to have been defeated. This may help undermine similar initiatives in other US states. Yay! 2. On a much more important issue ( ;-) ), I brought up Baumol's spud-silliness with my MBA students last night and they responded well. in pen-l solidarity, J

[PEN-L:394] a PN/PI call to [obfuscation]

1998-06-03 Thread valis
> Pardon my ignorance, but what is the PN/PI debate? . > Nothing personal, but I think that aping policy wonks and corporate execs > in heavy usage of jargon is the main reason why the Left has a rather > limited success in getting its messag

[PEN-L:399] The Economic Meaning of Violence/2

1998-06-03 Thread MARY
I don't think that this came through--my apologies if it's queued somewhere and this is clutter! * Hello all! I'm just beginning to put together a paper on the role that violence has played in the economic history of women, p

[PEN-L:398] Re: In Defense of History

1998-06-03 Thread James Devine
I wrote: >>This realist postulate [i.e., that objective reality exists independent of our perception of it] is a postulate. That means that it can't be proven. But it seems a necessary assumption if we want to avoid getting into circular arguments or epistemological nihism and relativism. << rica

[PEN-L:391] Re: Interesting Stiglitz article

1998-06-03 Thread Robert Naiman
Contrary to what Wolfie says in this article, I have heard that he did muzzle Stiglitz. But no matter. The damage is done. Everyone in Washington who cares knows that the chief economist of the World Bank and the former head of Clinton's CEA trashed the IMF policy in Asia. That was very, very