Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-02 Thread Gerald Levy
Stephen E Philion wrote: Yes, but Jerry you have to explain why you recommend that Doug a) choose a liberal school that charges outrageous tution rates that most working class students cannot afford instead of the Marxist School, which is much cheaper and run by a group of admisitrators who

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-02 Thread MIKEY
Friends, I do not know why comrade Levy is so bitter. Who needs this stuff? I doubt Doug needs to go back to school though it would be nice to think of pen-l as a school in which we all can learn rahter than make smart aleck remarks. michael yates

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-02 Thread MScoleman
In a message dated 97-11-01 21:26:21 EST, you write: my vote is that Doug should go to SUNY--Stonybrook. For game theory. Hey, hey, hey! My mother graduated from stony brook in the early 1970s. Her graduating class all wore gas masks in protest against the war. We (her kids -- only five of

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Doug Henwood
Gerald Levy wrote: If it is really true that you "don't know the answer to this", then you should consider either going back to school (since you live in NYC, you could apply at the New School) or changing your occupation (perhaps you might make a decent English Lit instructor). If having made

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Stephen E Philion
On Sat, 1 Nov 1997, Gerald Levy wrote: Yes, but Jerry you have to explain why you recommend that Doug a) choose a liberal school that charges outrageous tution rates that most working class students cannot afford instead of the Marxist School, which is much cheaper and run by a group of

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Gerald Levy
Gil Skillman wrote: And forget the New or Marxist Schools, my vote is that Doug should go to SUNY--Stonybrook. For game theory. [Hah, that'll shake him up.] Last time I checked, there were quite a few (mathematics) courses on game theory at NYU (a short walk away from the New School). The

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Gerald Levy
Gil wrote: Jerry writes: Look: you can't have it both ways: either value categories are important or they are not... Jerry, this seems uncharacteristically dogmatic of you. There is nothing dogmatic in one's pointing out that someone has: a) avoided repeatedly answering a question; b)

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Doug Henwood
Gil Skillman wrote: And forget the New or Marxist Schools, my vote is that Doug should go to SUNY--Stonybrook. For game theory. I'd prefer dentistry without anesthesia. Doug

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Gil Skillman
Jerry writes, anent Doug: Amazing ... you haven't "made up your mind" yet about value theory, but have just written a "Marxist" work claiming to be about political economy. Whether or not it's "Marxist", Doug's book is certainly "about political economy", and the validity and relevance of his

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Gerald Levy
Stephen E Philion wrote: state and take a position. If it is really true that you "don't know the answer to this", then you should consider either going back to school Jerry is staking out a very elitist intellectual position here that only in school do we learn anything. You had to cut

[PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Gerald Levy
Doug Henwood wrote previously: Value categories may be important for examining the inner dynamics of capitalist economies, which led me to note: Well ... that's certainly a wishy-washy statement. and then ask: Are they important or are they not? If they are important, how are they

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Gerald Levy
Doug Henwood wrote: If having made up your mind about everything is a mark of sophistication, then I think both knowledge and politics could do with a little more naivete. Amazing ... you haven't "made up your mind" yet about value theory, but have just written a "Marxist" work claiming to

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Gil Skillman
Jerry writes: Look: you can't have it both ways: either value categories are important or they are not... Jerry, this seems uncharacteristically dogmatic of you. Aside from matters of faith, the only way to gauge the "importance" of value categories is according to their relevance in

Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

1997-11-01 Thread Doug Henwood
Gerald Levy wrote: Thus, the issue is confronting anti-theory biases, imho. Jerry, you've caught me out. If I weren't scheduled to visit Chico (on Michael Perelman's invitation) this week, I'd jump out the window right next to me. I promise, though, as soon as I get back, I'll end my miserable