Lakoff was More on anti-corruption

2003-11-04 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Pen 'Ellers, Thanks Joanna for forwarding Lakoff's interview. I've enjoyed reading Lakoff, especially on philosophy and mathematics. Lakoff argues for 'embodiment' which I think helps to clarify the many muddy arguments about cognition and dissipate the mind duality that permeates the

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Eubulides
- Original Message - From: Jurriaan Bendien [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anti-corruption information at http://www.nobribes.org/ and www.transparency.org . Transparency International has branches in several countries. For the Global Corruption Report 2003, see

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
These days the bourgeoisie likes to plunder with love. Privacy ? We will provide it for the working class. Lovers ? We will provide them for the working class. Jobs ? We will provide them for the working class ? Human decency ? We will provide it for the working class. The bourgeois are bourgeois,

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Devine, James
And yet the US scores rather well compared to say, Nigeria on the corruption index... I agree that there's no way one could create a corruption index. It can't be quantified. Yet the moment we let the above definition serve as the baseline norm ... I didn't know that the discussion was

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Eubulides
- Original Message - From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] And yet the US scores rather well compared to say, Nigeria on the corruption index... I agree that there's no way one could create a corruption index. It can't be quantified. Yet the moment we let the above definition serve

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
I agree that there's no way one could create a corruption index. It can't be quantified. You mean it is an externality cost and we cannot establish a price for it ? Then of course it must be corruption ! A respected Jungian psychotherapist once told me that Marx was rubbish and I should drop

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Devine, James
Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message- From: Eubulides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PEN-L] More on anti-corruption - Original Message - From: Devine, James

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Michael Perelman
Isn't this thread getting corrupted? -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Eubulides
- Original Message - From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:24 PM Subject: Re: [PEN-L] More on anti-corruption The physics formula F = M.a is circular, because each term is defined by the other two. The concept of a point in geometry

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
Jim wrote: The physics formula F = M.a is circular, because each term is defined by the other two. The concept of a point in geometry is also circular. These examples (and many others) suggest that there is nothing wrong with circular definitions, as long as one is clear about the nature of that

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread joanna bujes
Jurriaan Bendien wrote We only make progress if we extract the hidden logic behind the metaphors that paralyse our thinking. Yes. True. Interestingly enough, the following was posted to LBO a few days ago. I knew Lakoff at UC Berkeley when his star was rising. He was doing interesting work and

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Eubulides
- Original Message - From: joanna bujes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jurriaan Bendien wrote We only make progress if we extract the hidden logic behind the metaphors that paralyse our thinking. == In the above, extract is a metaphor and the assertion itself relies on

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
Schwarzendegger. J. - Original Message - From: Eubulides [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:02 AM Subject: Re: [PEN-L] More on anti-corruption - Original Message - From: joanna bujes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jurriaan Bendien wrote We only

Re: More on anti-corruption

2003-11-03 Thread Mike Ballard
--- joanna bujes [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded this article for comment: Jurriaan Bendien wrote We only make progress if we extract the hidden logic behind the metaphors that paralyse our thinking. Yes. True. Interestingly enough, the following was posted to LBO a few days ago. I knew

More on anti-corruption

2003-11-02 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
The British Statistical Office estimated that fraud accounted for maybe 11 billion British pounds of foreign trade and up to 0.2 percent of GDP. See: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/economic_trends/ETAug03Ruffles.pdf In the industrialised countries, annual crime victim rates are from one in