Re: [PATCH] recreatable shuffled tests for prove

2005-07-26 Thread Adriano Ferreira
On 7/25/05, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: prove --shuffle --list=5,4,0,1,2,3 t # the shuffle list is predetermined I'm not sure I see the utility in that last one that significantly beats out just reordering the arguments to prove. Do you have a use case? And what happens

Re: HTTP::Recorder

2005-07-26 Thread Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat
Le mardi 12 juillet 2005 à 19:35, Ian Langworth écrivait: I'd like to improve HTTP::Recorder. I've contacted Linda Julien (http://search.cpan.org/~leira/) via her CPAN email address, but I've received no response. The module hasn't been touched in over a year and every RT ticket seems to have

Re: [PATCH] recreatable shuffled tests for prove

2005-07-26 Thread Andy Lester
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:51:01AM -0300, Adriano Ferreira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The whole point of this option is to allow the reproduction of a certain order even in a Perl that was not compiled with the same This option has to be able to handle the case of a set of 1000 tests, all

Re: [PATCH] recreatable shuffled tests for prove

2005-07-26 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:51:01AM -0300, Adriano Ferreira wrote: Instead of giving the seed for shuffling, the list can be predetermined with the Clist argument. $ prove -b -D -d -s --list=1,2,0,3,4 0 1 2 3 4 will run the same sequence everywhere, without concern for differences

Re: Test harnesses?

2005-07-26 Thread Adrian Howard
On 25 Jul 2005, at 22:29, Peter Kay wrote: http://qa.perl.org/test-modules.html has a bunch of test modules listed. However, there are no harnesses listed. I know Test::Harness, and I'm going to go read about Test::Builder, but what other meta-testing modules are there? [snip] All depends

Re: [PATCH] recreatable shuffled tests for prove

2005-07-26 Thread Adriano Ferreira
On 7/26/05, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, that's exactly what I was worried about. Why not just write: prove -b -D -d 1 2 0 3 4 this even avoids having to write special code to handle Andy's worry about large lists of arguments. I see your point and agree.

Re: Test harnesses?

2005-07-26 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 04:38:45PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote: One of the things that makes Perl's standard testing framework interesting is that everything is so decoupled. As long as something talks TAP you can plug it in. As well as Test::Harness, you might want to look at:

Re: [PATCH] recreatable shuffled tests for prove

2005-07-26 Thread Adriano Ferreira
Here is another patch. No --list anymore. Just --seed. There is also a new test script t/prove-shuffle.t. It touches the MANIFEST and tweaks t/prove-globbing.t which depends on distribution files matching t/prove*.t. Adriano. prove-patch Description: Binary data