Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Offer Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just an example, IO::All [1] version 0.33 has been available since Dec
17, 2004. It passed testing many times, at least according to its
testers page [2]. My default 5.8.7 ActivePerl distribution lists
IO::All version 0.17 .
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 18:38:32 +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> I second this. IPC::Run3 has treated me well on a few occasions, and I'm
> gradually porting various things of mine over to IPC::Run3 as they come to my
> attention for other issues.
It looks like the ugprade path from IPC::Run3 to I
David Golden wrote:
Tamas Dober wrote:
I'd like to test that that a batch file (starting a Java app) gives me
the expected output or not.
Could you please help me what direction I should go, what module
should I use?
I've had good experiences with IPC::Run3. It's pretty lightweight and
intu
Beta testing - CPAN tracks intra-module dependencies, and does automated
testing, but only on released modules. It would seem useful to allow
an author to upload a "beta" version of their module, and then run the
tests of a dozen or so modules that depend on it. This way, you would
gain
On 2/6/06, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>
> http://perldoc.perl.org/perl58delta.html#New-Modules-and-Pragmata
>
I see what you mean... what threw me off was that it is not listed under:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/perl-5.8.8/
Cheers,
--
Offer Kaye
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:16:11AM +0200, Offer Kaye wrote:
> OT question - why is Scalar-List-Utils listed as "CORE"? It is not
> part of the Perl5 core
http://perldoc.perl.org/perl58delta.html#New-Modules-and-Pragmata
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 15:42:26 -0800, Tamas Dober wrote:
> It seems I couldn't redirect the output.
This is probably because the program prints on STDERR. Look into the
redirect examples, and try to also capture \$err after \$out - see
if that helps
> Maybe IPC::Run is not a good choice?
I th
On 2/5/06, Offer Kaye wrote:
>
> [3]
> http://ppm.activestate.com/BuildStatus/5.8-windows/windows-5.8/Scalar-List-Util-1.15.txt
>
Something funky here...
Last night I looked at "Scalar-List-Util"... but the correct name as
Tyler said is "Scalar-List-Utils", with an "s" at the end.
Looking at [1]
* Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-05 21:40]:
> http://search.cpan.org/src/BRYCE/Test-Parser-1.00/t/01_script_compile.t
I know this is beside the point, but I have to point out that
this script will break on at least Windows – and probably every
other non-Unix OS as well.
* Sébastien
Bryce Harrington wrote:
Default tests - Like probably a lot of perl module writers, I don't
write tests nearly as often as I should, but I have collected a few
simple default tests that I can toss into a new module and reuse
without modification. For example:
http://search.cpan.org/src
Tamas Dober wrote:
I'd like to test that that a batch file (starting a Java app) gives me the
expected output or not.
Could you please help me what direction I should go, what module should I use?
I've had good experiences with IPC::Run3. It's pretty lightweight and
intuitive.
If you would
Tamas Dober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a beginner, please forgive me b/c of the simple questions.
>
> I'd like to test that that a batch file (starting a Java app) gives me the
> expected output or not.
I really like IPC::Run, but it is a bit of a heavy package to make
Hello,
I'm a beginner, please forgive me b/c of the simple questions.
I'd like to test that that a batch file (starting a Java app) gives me the
expected output or not.
What I have now:
use strict;
use warnings;
use IPC::Run 'run';
my $out;
my @ls = ( '\/perl\/Feb\/packager\/bin\/package.ba
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Beta testing - CPAN tracks intra-module dependencies, and does automated
> testing, but only on released modules. It would seem useful to allow
> an author to upload a "beta" version of their module, and then run the
> tests of a dozen or so modules that depend o
On Feb 5, 2006, at 2:36 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
[snip]
It would seem to be useful if CPAN were to have a couple really
basic
tests like this to run for perl modules that haven't created any
tests
themselves.
Obviously, this only benefits immature modules, but this might be a
Offer Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Phillipe Chaisson aka "Gozer" (one of the mod_perl authors) is
> > responsible for the ActiveState PPM repositories now,
> Hi Gozer, nice to meet you. Gratz on ActiveState's move to a new
> company, good luck :)
It's a Good Thing for all com
Offer Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just an example, IO::All [1] version 0.33 has been available since Dec
> 17, 2004. It passed testing many times, at least according to its
> testers page [2]. My default 5.8.7 ActivePerl distribution lists
> IO::All version 0.17 .
According to
http:/
On 2/5/06, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
>
>ActiveState always serves the last available version where all tests
> passed on a given platform. It attempts to build and test every package on
> CPAN at least once a week. If something isn't available, it means the tests
> failed, which could mean:
>
Chromatic and I were discussing CPAN testing at a conference yesterday.
I made some comments about things that I thought would be useful and he
encouraged me to post them here...
Default tests - Like probably a lot of perl module writers, I don't
write tests nearly as often as I should, but I h
On 2/5/06, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2006 13:54, Tels wrote:
> > Moin Offer Kaye (sorry, can't identify which part of your name which is
> > the one you are called by :-)
> >
>
> Just for everybody's information:
>
> Offer is his first name. (Means "Bambi" in Hebrew).
Moin Tels, d
On Sunday 05 February 2006 13:54, Tels wrote:
> Moin Offer Kaye (sorry, can't identify which part of your name which is
> the one you are called by :-)
>
Just for everybody's information:
Offer is his first name. (Means "Bambi" in Hebrew). Kaye is his last name.
(Don't know what it means - it's
On 2/5/06, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/1/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Having the test suite quit and say "Sorry, don't use this -- it works better
> > than we expect" seems awfully silly. Again, there's already a way to catch
> > your (rare) catastrophic bonus tests
On 2/1/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having the test suite quit and say "Sorry, don't use this -- it works better
> than we expect" seems awfully silly. Again, there's already a way to catch
> your (rare) catastrophic bonus tests -- capture and check their return
> values.
Yes it is
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Offer Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not start off by providing ppm.cpan.org (as the OP suggested for
linux distors), or something similar? There are many modules that I
want to use where the PPM version provided by ActiveState or some
other repository is badly of out
Moin Offer Kaye (sorry, can't identify which part of your name which is
the one you are called by :-)
On Sunday 05 February 2006 07:59, Offer Kaye wrote:
> On 1/28/06, Tels wrote:
> > Of course you must reliaze that, except for pure-perl modules and
> > very controlled environments, binary distri
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
3) Tests are failing because of ActiveState's build system
For 3), that could mean because the build system itself is screwed
or they don't have some library available.
Phillipe Chaisson aka "Gozer" (one of the mod_perl authors) is
responsible for
26 matches
Mail list logo
