* Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-02 03:40]:
> I know it's not as cute as the current interface - but cute can
> be surprising and I don't think a surprising interface is
> necessarily a good thing :)
Agreed. It just depended on what you preferred; in case of a
method per metric, gene
On 2 Jun 2007, at 01:25, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-01 16:25]:
I could
* generate the methods dynamically based on the Kwalitee
modules that are installed
* generate only the current methods and add a new method
test_against() (or whatever) that prov
* Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-01 16:25]:
> I could
>
> * generate the methods dynamically based on the Kwalitee
> modules that are installed
>
> * generate only the current methods and add a new method
> test_against() (or whatever) that provides access to any
> named Kwalit
I've started crafting Test::Pod::URI to extract URIs from POD and check
them to make sure they work. However, my CPAN-fu has been weak today, so
I thought I'd mail here and see if anyone knew of anything out there
that already does such a thing. Anyone?
Ian
P.S. If there isn't such a thing, d
This is a combo library/script that is designed to do automated smoke
tests on multiple "test sets" (in my case, branches of a code base). It
has hooks for pushing reports into Smolder, and it has infrastructure in
place so someone could write something to send emails of test results as
well.
On Friday 01 June 2007 10:47:00 Andy Armstrong wrote:
> You could send them to me if you fancy? I'm guessing chromatic's
> pretty busy.
I lost most of my outstanding patches a couple of weeks ago too, and only just
noticed.
-- c
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:23:14PM +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> Test::Kwalitee currently exposes the known test types as methods. I can
> make it delve into Module::CPANTS::Analyse to find the tests that are
> actually available - but then what to do about the methods?
Sorry, not a lot of
Quoting brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 5/31/07, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 31 May 2007, at 21:42, brian d foy wrote:
> > > I've just been running cpants_lint.pl before I upload anything. If it
> > > doesn't say "perfect", that fails. :)
> >
> > Yes, damn you :)
> >
> >
On 1 Jun 2007, at 18:41, Nathan S. Haigh wrote:
I recently made some simple changes to Test::Kwalitee so that it
would test all the metrics provided by Module::CPANTS::Analyse.
However, Chromitic
hasn´t yet updated CPAN with these changes. I´m on holiday at the
moment so I won´t be even more
Quoting Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 1 Jun 2007, at 06:38, chromatic wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:08:27 Andy Armstrong wrote:
> >> On 1 Jun 2007, at 02:09, brian d foy wrote:
> >>> I'll have some time next week if Andy doesn't beat me too it.
> >>
> >> I'm having a rummage
On 1 Jun 2007, at 06:38, chromatic wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:08:27 Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 1 Jun 2007, at 02:09, brian d foy wrote:
I'll have some time next week if Andy doesn't beat me too it.
I'm having a rummage around now :)
chromatic: do you have a .perltidyrc you could send m
11 matches
Mail list logo
