Quoting Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On 1 Jun 2007, at 06:38, chromatic wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:08:27 Andy Armstrong wrote:
> >> On 1 Jun 2007, at 02:09, brian d foy wrote:
> >>> I'll have some time next week if Andy doesn't beat me too it.
> >>
> >> I'm having a rummage around now :)
> >>
> >> chromatic: do you have a .perltidyrc you could send me? My muscle
> >> memory keeps reaching for the perltidy hot key that would convert
> >> your code to AndyPerl :)
> >
> > I use -ci=4 -bl these days.
> 
> Not on Test::Kwalitee you didn't :)
> 
> What's peoples' view on this?
> 
> Test::Kwalitee currently exposes the known test types as methods. I can
> make it delve into Module::CPANTS::Analyse to find the tests that are
> actually available - but then what to do about the methods?
> 
> I could
> 
> * generate the methods dynamically based on the Kwalitee modules that
>    are installed
> 
> * generate only the current methods and add a new method test_against()
>    (or whatever) that provides access to any named Kwalitee test
> 
> * replace the generated methods with an AUTOLOAD handler
> 
> In the test_against() or AUTOLOAD scenarios I could then make Kwalitee
> tests for which the module is unavailable skip automatically.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -- 
> Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
> 
> 


I recently made some simple changes to Test::Kwalitee so that it would test all 
the metrics provided by Module::CPANTS::Analyse. However, Chromitic
hasn´t yet updated CPAN with these changes. I´m on holiday at the moment so I 
won´t be even more nerdy than I am at the moment )reading my works
e-mails) by going into detail about the changes. Either Chromictic could get 
the changes through into CPAN or I can send you my changes on my return
from holiday!

Cheers
Nathan

Reply via email to