Hi!
CPANTS and Phalanx both care about Kwalitee. So I thought it might be a good
idea to come up with one more or less complete list of Kwalitee-hints that
both projects can use.
A lot of the hints listed at http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/kwalitee.html are
rather vague, which is OK for Phalanx, as
Hi!
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:48:11PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
The Phalanx project has started its rampup to an official
announcement. Phalanx is going to beef up the tests, coverage and
docs on Perl and 100 heavily-used modules from CPAN.
Have you got an plans on combining Phalanx and
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:00:44PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
I'd certainly like to see something like this worked on. We do a lot of
this stuff automagically as part of our RCS anyway - people can't check
in code that doesn't pass certain guidelines (all public methods
documented etc.)
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 11:25:14PM +1000, Andrew Savige wrote:
It doesn't have to eval the whole of CPAN to be useful.
I see the mythical Module::Scrutinize as perhaps a little orthogonal
to Module::CPANTS, as something that may help individual CPAN authors
produce a higher quality
101 - 104 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
