Re: RFC - eliminate discrete arenaroots

tation "cuz". I sometimes use "w/" and "w/o", but the former is already borderline for me. I think you have the time to spell comments out. Otherwise we will see comments like this one next: /* 4 u we r ! d0ing teh all0cat'n */ :-D Best wishes, Tels -

Re: [perl #36766] perldoc pollutes TEMP

probably even survive a Perl deinstall. But who in his right mind would stop using Perl? :-P Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Fri Aug 5 10:07:39 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.

Re: affect/effect (was perlfunc.pod grammar fixes)

cause a brushing of my teeth; I just brush them. Yes, but you toothbrushing causes your teeth to get clean. :) >Furthermore, I find this use of 'effect' to be rather affected. :-) This is one sentence I wouldn't be able to understand without a dictionary. IMHO the Perl doumen

Re: pp_negate

t of this is: > >$ perl -wle '$f = "-100"; print -$f' >+100 >$ perl -wle '$f = -100; print -$f' >100 The first one looks wrong to me: # perl -wle '$f = "-fo"; print -$f' +fo # perl -wle '$f = "-NaN"; print -$f

Re: [PATCH] #2 try at Text::Balanced patch and maintainership

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Wednesday 13 July 2005 11:49, Steve Hay wrote: > Tels wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > >Moin, > > > >this mail has a patch to Text::Balanced as attachement. The last time > > I sent this t

Re: [perl #20353] Perl 5.8.0 fails "make test" on Cobalt Raq4 in Math::BigInt

gt; > lib/Math/BigInt/t/bare_mif...FAILED at test 511 > > lib/Math/BigInt/t/bigfltpm...make[2]: *** [_test_tty] Error > > 139 [snipabit] > > ("make test" for Perl 5.6.1, built in the same way, on the same > > machine, reports no problems.) > >

Re: Release Announcement: PPI 1.000

which packages a package "use"s or "require"s, I could use PPI. Hm. For a start, I put PPI through to my perl-graph-generate script. The result can be found here: http://bloodgate.com/perl/graph/usage/examples.html (link at bottom) (Warning, big file 14100 x 735 p

[PATCH] #2 try at Text::Balanced patch and maintainership

now how the blead Perl and the CPAN version differ, though). Once we have sorted out who should apply this patch to which version (or snyc which one with which, first), then a new CPAN release is probably in order. :) If these is anything I can do to further resolve this issue, just drop me a note or

Re: [PATCH] no Carp #8 - SelfLoader, Text/Balanced and open.pm

alpha-style versions numbers, you can directly increment them. Thanx, I will try to keep all the advices I got in mind :) I'll also drop the maintainer of Text/Balanced a note. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Wed Jul 6 21:26:48 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http

Re: Warnings in Math::BigInt::FastCalc

erflow it. This means you could theoretically construct a BigInt with so many parts that you cannot convert it into a string, IIAC. OTOH, constructing such a big array will probably overflow your memory, anyway. And I haven't even thought about 64bit platforms. Ugh. I am not sure what to change in th

[PATCH] bug with charnames::viacode("0x1234") and optimize it

ll come when I rewrote charnames.t to use is() instead of printing ok or not ok (because it is quite hard to insert a test in the middle, where it belongs). Btw, can Carp::croak() ever return? I think the return statements after carp() are superflouse and can be removed. Best wishe

Re: Some datapoints on hash performanc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Monday 04 July 2005 21:30, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Semi-stupid question. How do I get different patch-levels from blead? > > I know how to get the latest, but have no idea how to checkou

[PATCH] make t/uni/class.t faster

ystem (2.0 Ghz AMD XP 2400+) the time goes down from about 31 seconds to about 19 seconds after the patch. The entire testsuite takes now 175 (opposed to 181 a few days a ago) seconds: All tests successful. u=2.68 s=0.71 cu=175.30 cs=25.13 scripts=954 tests=107895 Best wishes, Tels - -- Sign

Re: Math::BigInt, maint and Crypt::DSA

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Tuesday 28 June 2005 18:37, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > Tels wrote: > > > Tels, can you reproduce this problem ? > > > > Not yet (5.8.6, BigInt 1.77, FastCalc 0.10). > > > > Maybe the test just gets much slo

Re: Math::BigInt, maint and Crypt::DSA

d in 5.8.7 relative to Math::BigInt being upgraded. > > (OTOH the cause might be completely different. I haven't tested much.) > > Tels, can you reproduce this problem ? Not yet (5.8.6, BigInt 1.77, FastCalc 0.10). Maybe the test just gets much slower because it took quite a whil

Re: Math::BigInt, maint and Crypt::DSA

d in 5.8.7 relative to Math::BigInt being upgraded. The second AFAIK, and the first I cannot reproduce :( > (OTOH the cause might be completely different. I haven't tested much.) > > Tels, can you reproduce this problem ? I have a go tonight. But I go (no pun intended :) on a little

Re: Carp vs Carp::Heavy was: Re: [PATCH] Put Carp into the Tarpit (No Carp #2 - Archive::Tar)

he streamlining. I'd say that the patch number #8 from me (no Carp #8 - SelfLoader, Text/Balanced and open.pm) should be still applied, because it works towards more consistent code. Best wishes, Tels PS: >cummulative changes, all running ./perl -Ilib -e 'use Carp; 1' What do

[PATCH] no Carp #8 - SelfLoader, Text/Balanced and open.pm

open: loaded Carp on demand in two places, but forgot the third * Text/Balanced: tried to load Carp on demand, but since it used accidentily "use" vs. "require", didn't achive the desired effect. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 26 21:12:58 2005 with key 0x93B84C15.

[PATCH] no Carp #7 - charnames.pm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, as the subject says, this one handles charnames.pm. (That file looks like it could use someother optimizations, too. Like inlining _getcode() etc). If I should send these patches in differently, don't hesitate to tell me. Best wishes,

Re: Carp vs Carp::Heavy was: Re: [PATCH] Put Carp into the Tarpit (No Carp #2 - Archive::Tar)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 26 June 2005 14:32, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:58:26PM +0200, Tels wrote: > > (Including vars, because that gives us strict, vars, and warnings as > > a baseline): > strict costs 120K + 8K vm. st

Re: Carp vs Carp::Heavy was: Re: [PATCH] Put Carp into the Tarpit (No Carp #2 - Archive::Tar)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 26 June 2005 18:35, Dave Mitchell wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 03:16:37PM +0200, Tels wrote: > > * no matter how you measure it, memory consumption goes down > > Only if the whole code body manages to avoid including Carp.p

Re: Carp vs Carp::Heavy was: Re: [PATCH] Put Carp into the Tarpit (No Carp #2 - Archive::Tar)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 26 June 2005 14:32, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:58:26PM +0200, Tels wrote: > > (Including vars, because that gives us strict, vars, and warnings as > > a baseline): > > > > # ./perl -Ilib

Re: [PATCH] Put Carp into the Tarpit (No Carp #2 - Archive::Tar)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 26 June 2005 14:16, Dave Mitchell wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:42:40PM +0200, Tels wrote: > > Example with bleadperl (because there "use vars" doesn't load Carp): [snip] > So you can't really conclude an

[PATCH] no Carp #6 (File::Compare, File::Copy, File::Temp)

ether they are usefull (I think so) or not. Makes no sense to prepare them when they won't get applied. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 26 13:21:42 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or

Carp vs Carp::Heavy was: Re: [PATCH] Put Carp into the Tarpit (No Carp #2 - Archive::Tar)

Or in other words, does not loading Carp::Heavy not have a big effect as not loading Carp at all? (tripple negatives are fun :) Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 26 13:54:18 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgat

Re: [PATCH] Put Carp into the Tarpit (No Carp #2 - Archive::Tar)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 26 June 2005 13:09, Dave Mitchell wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 11:00:31AM +0200, Tels wrote: > > in my quest to rescue^Wpreserve memory, here is the second patch in > > my noCarp series. The first one can be found here: > &

[PATCH] no Carp #5 (File::Path)

::Path is used by so many modules, like Archive::Tar and AutoSplit, that my efforts to show a memory difference were a bit hindered by it :) Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 26 12:51:24 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http

[PATCH] No Carp #4 AutoSplit.pm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, subject says it all. As usual, all tests pass: All tests successful. u=2.72 s=0.79 cu=187.33 cs=25.67 scripts=954 tests=107891 Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 26 12:31:40 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http

The speed of t/uni/class.t - experimental [PATCH]

Test.pm? B.2: Now matter why it is faster, can we safely rewrite the tests that way? That would cut out about 5% of the entire testsuite running time. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 26 11:01:56 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP ke

[PATCH] no Carp! #3 - Attribute::Handlers

successful. u=2.74 s=0.81 cu=186.77 cs=25.45 scripts=954 tests=107891 One more comment: What is with the files in /lib/Attribute/Handlers/demo? Won't these get accidentily installed? Best wishes, Tels [0] Thanx to Google. - -- Signed on Sun Jun 26 11:14:40 2005 with key 0x93B

[PATCH] Put Carp into the Tarpit (No Carp #2 - Archive::Tar)

before/after, but I fear that error handling is not tested in Archive::Tar's testsuite. If somebody has any idea how to add a test for this, feel free to start :) All tests successful. u=2.66 s=0.73 cu=178.57 cs=24.03 scripts=954 tests=107891 Best wishes, Tels - -- S

../../proto.h:1027: warning: `Perl_malloc' attribute directive ignored

) Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 26 10:48:51 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my p

updated/podified http://gisle.aas.no/perl/illguts/ ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, does anybody have this document: http://gisle.aas.no/perl/illguts/ in POD formator even an updated version (especially after Nicholas changes to the basic SV memory allocation layout)? Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Fri Jun 24 17:29:25

Re: [perl #36238] Perl 5.8.7 + Net::IP breaks (operator overloading problem?)

arnings; use Math::BigInt lib => 'Calc'; use Net::IP; my $ips = new Net::IP ("10.0.0.100 - 10.0.0.254"); print Math::BigInt->config()->{lib}, " v", Math::BigInt->config()->{lib_version}, "\n"; do { print "IP: " . $

Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #9741] possible problem with File::Find

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Saturday 18 June 2005 22:21, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 11:21:19AM +0200, Tels wrote: > > if ($Is_MacOS) { > > - - ($topdev,$topino,$topmode,$topnlink) = $follow ? stat > > $top_i

Re: Access to POWER5 test servers.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Saturday 18 June 2005 19:35, Garry Williams wrote: > On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 11:14 +0200, Tels wrote: > > with Firefox 1.04 under Suse I always get: > > >Please answer all required fields > > > > No matter what I fill in.

Re: Editor-Jiggery was: Re: [PATCH] Lint support

riginal question about the editor remarks: Ok, I retract my objections. There are more important things. :) Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sat Jun 18 11:21:46 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per

[PATCH] Re: [perl #9741] possible problem with File::Find

n Win32 and passed >its tests. It also clears up the bugs seen above. Also included is a >small doc nit for File::Find and a version bump. I am not sure, but couldn't all the platform-specific file/path/dir juggling be done by File::Find just using File::Spec? Best wishes,

Access to POWER5 test servers.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, with Firefox 1.04 under Suse I always get: >Please answer all required fields No matter what I fill in. Hopefully the servers are better configured than their sign-up process... Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sat Jun 18 11:12:42 2005 with

Re: Editor-Jiggery was: Re: [PATCH] Lint support

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Friday 17 June 2005 12:30, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:13:05PM +0200, Tels wrote: > > * If you add vim and emacs, will next time people want to put in code > > for Kate, pico, ed, $other-obscure-IDE? > &g

Editor-Jiggery was: Re: [PATCH] Lint support

t to do - that leads to the "let's embed macros and code" route ala .doc files with macro viruses in them. However, since I am editing Perl source code only seldom, other people should have a more strong vote on that than me. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Fri Jun 17 12

Re: We're a bunch of potty mouths.

in Perl... most of which >are from me. :) Maybe we should just start naming random data structures like so: struct SV_damned { ... }; struct SV_fallen_angel { ... }; struct SV_stupidstupid { ... }; etc :) Best wishes, Tels PS: I really don't give

Re: [PATCH] Lint support

p; !PERL_CORE */ > > #endif /* _INC_PERL_XSUB_H */ /* include guard */ >+ >+/* >+ * Local variables: >+ * c-indentation-style: bsd >+ * c-basic-offset: 4 >+ * indent-tabs-mode: t >+ * End: >+ * >+ * ex: set ts=8 sts=4 sw=4 noet: >+ */ What are these lines for? Be

[PATCH] Make Time::Local to load Carp only when nec.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, please see attached patch. All tests successful. u=2.75 s=0.68 cu=184.66 cs=24.10 scripts=949 tests=107137 real6m7.867s user3m10.656s sys 0m26.229s Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Wed Jun 15 12:16:26 2005 with key 0x93B84C15

Re: [perl #36268] Time::Local's croak calls cannot be silenced

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Monday 13 June 2005 21:41, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 07:47:36PM +0200, Tels wrote: > > * bump the version > > I usually leave that to the bleadperl folks. I think that whoever applies the patch has an easier l

Re: [perl #36268] Time::Local's croak calls cannot be silenced

. I Cc'ed this to Dave Rolsky and datetime@perl.org, both emails are given in the POD as support contacts. Let's see if they still work :) Thanx, Tels - -- Signed on Mon Jun 13 19:43:29 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on h

Re: Some datapoints on hash performanc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 12 June 2005 13:22, Tassilo von Parseval wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:42:01AM +0200 Tels wrote: > If you have enough space on your disks, an APC repository of all perl > changes is useful to have around: > > $ rs

Re: Some datapoints on hash performanc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 12 June 2005 13:22, Tassilo von Parseval wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:42:01AM +0200 Tels wrote: > > >On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 12:12:22AM +0200, David Landgren wrote: > > >> Executive summary: it looks like 5.8.7 is

Re: Some datapoints on hash performanc

ow how to get the latest, but have no idea how to checkout a certain patch number, or even how to find out which one I would need. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 12 11:40:26 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://blood

Re: Some datapoints on hash performance

nd a couple of scalars that all need to be created. What I saw, though, was a reduction in memory overhead, from IIRC 295 bytes down to 275 bytes (per BigInt object), including all overhead. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Jun 12 01:22:22 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery

Re: [PATCH] regcomp.c and more

} That seems to contradict what you wrote earlier :) Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Thu Jun 9 22:23:49 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. This email violates U.S. patent #6,77

perl5-porters@perl.org

EADME, MANIFEST, >INSTALL, META.yml or change log files which might be floating around in >lib/ Add "TODO", "BUGS" and "CREDITS"? Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Fri May 27 11:30:00 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photo

Re: [perl #35982] rt.cpan.org?

version 1.75, which is old and so I cannot assign "fixed in v1.76" to any BigInt bug). I sent them an email to their bug queue, got my ticket and then nothing happened for a week or so. (Come to think of, my ticket from 2005-03-20 was never answered, either) Best wishes, Tels - -

Re: 5.8.7 RC1 (uh-oh, Math::BigInt bug)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Thursday 26 May 2005 18:08, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Tels wrote: > > Now, I have prepared a patch (attached) that brings blead to v1.77 - > > I can prepare one against 5.8.7RC1 if nec. >

Re: Removing needless files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 22 May 2005 20:32, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > On 5/22/05, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snipabit] > > Some comments: > > > > * Changelogs and READMEs: Some modules have them, some not, some are > > horribl

Re: Removing needless files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 22 May 2005 20:10, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote: > On 2005-05-22, at 12:24:57 +0200, Tels wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > > Moin, > > > > it looks to me like there are quite a few files in

Re: questions about struct RExC_state_t

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 22 May 2005 19:54, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote: > On 2005-05-22, at 12:47:35 +0200, Tels wrote: > > attached is a patch that should improve the aligning of struct > > members in RExC_state_t (assuming that 4 chars are as big a

questions about struct RExC_state_t

s it worthwhile to try to slim down this struct? Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun May 22 12:43:07 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. This email violates U.S. patent #6,756,999 <http:/

Removing needless files

the txt files really needed? They weight about 5.6 Mb, compare this to 28 Mb for the entire perl586 lib dir... Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun May 22 12:23:59 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or

Re: 5.8.7 RC1 (uh-oh, Math::BigInt bug)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin Nichalos, And now this is how things stood: The module was sitting on CPAN. The bug was in an older version, too close to the release. And the Tels worked round and round the clock, looking at them with shivery eyes. In the meantime, Nicholas

Re: use less memory?

rejects to file sv.c.rej I have not tried to compile the resulting goo of bleading code :o) And unfortunately I just don't have the expertise to fix the patch myself, either. Could you please attach a new patch against blead? Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Fri May 20 17:43:04

Re: Getting rid of AvFLAGS (was Re: 0x40000000 in SvFLAGS on AVs)

est wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Mon May 16 16:19:25 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. "Duke Nukem Forever is a 1999 game and we think that timeframe matches very well with what we have

Re: [PATCH] uninitialized warnings in regcomp

he warning and subtle errors creep in. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Mon May 2 23:16:29 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. I'm a Wei-wei-wei-wei-wei-wow-wow-wow-wow-wow-wow-wizzzaahrd

Re: [perl #35014] bignum bug in %

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Wednesday 20 April 2005 11:02, Dominic Dunlop wrote: >On 19 Apr 2005, at 22:44, Tels wrote: >> > I cannot reproduce this on my system :( >> > >> > # ./perl -Ilib -Mbignum -wle '$j=13; $sum[$j] = >> > 12345678

Re: Fwd: [perl #35014] bignum bug in %

to the Internet, point your browser at http://www.perl.org/, the Perl Home Page. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Tue Apr 19 22:43:31 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. "Proctor &am

Re: Fwd: [perl #35014] bignum bug in %

an somebody on the list > with a configuration closer to gamo's (perl5 (revision 5 version 8 > subversion 6) configuration: Platform: osname=linux, osvers=2.4.29, > archname=i686-linux-64int-ld) have a look at it? Thanks. > > (Tels, hope this gets through: some day I really mu

Re: [PATCH] integrate Math::BigInt::FastCalc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Tels wrote: >> attached the promised patch to integrate the XS code for >> Math::BigInt::Calc into blead. >> >> Before someone commits this, please check that it really

Re: [PATCH] Math::BigInt v1.75 released (what is "3 % -1"?)

ion of what these operations should actually do and represent. Also, if bmod() is not the remainder, does a remainder() function make sense? Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Apr 3 23:10:12 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http:/

Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #34632] perlintro: "Comments start with ahash symbol"

of >assignment etc etc. In addition: >-=item * Numerical >+=item * Assignment of return values from numeric equality tests doesn't >works "work" (no "s" :) I think most of the longer-than-80-chars items can be shortened without loss of information. Best

[Patch] Math::BigInt v1.76, Math::BigRat v0.15, bignum v0.17

bit, AMD XP 2400+): All tests successful. u=2.6 s=0.66 cu=185.64 cs=23.41 scripts=888 tests=104511 Best wishes, Tels BigInt: Calc : return $BASE from _base_len(), too MBI : fix rounding doc and add notes about precision() and accuracy new('inf')/new('

[PATCH] integrate Math::BigInt::FastCalc

ot to John Peacock, who first had the idea to seperate the core math logic from the high-level math code - this really makes things much more easier. On my system: All tests successful. u=2.71 s=0.71 cu=178.54 cs=23.29 scripts=891 tests=105078 Best wishes, Tels - -- Sign

Re: [PATCH] Math::BigInt v1.75 released (what is "3 % -1"?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Friday 01 April 2005 21:38, John Peacock wrote: > John Peacock wrote: > > With that in mind, I think that the Parrot definition of mod() has > > the most weight behind it: > > > > x mod y = x - y * floor(x / y) > > > > 2.1 mod -1 = 2.1 - (-1) * floo

Re: Perl 5.9.2 is out

lead.[1] I had hoped to bring this outbefore 5.9.2, but you were faster :) [0] Best wishes, Tels [0]: Don't worry, I was ready to send it on tuesday, and then bigrat's trap.t segfaulted and anything was delayed because I can't figure yet out why it crashes... [1] As discussed previously. I

Re: [PATCH] Math::BigInt v1.75 released (what is "3 % -1"?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 20 March 2005 14:00, Tels wrote: > Moin, > > the attached patch syncs blead with v1.75. New in this version: AARG! Reading the patch (I swear I did read it through before sending it off, but it only occur to me today that something wa

[PATCH] Math::BigInt v1.75 released

h!) MBF : likewise remove dependency on Scalar::Util in bdiv() fix documentation about rounding bdiv() cache result of "!$y->is_one()" for wantarray case to make ($res,$rem) = $x->bdiv($y); about 10% faster tests: for atan2() and Calc bug Best wishes, Tels - --

Re: FYI: warnings when compiling regcomp.c

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 20 March 2005 13:37, demerphq wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:12:07 +0100, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > > Moin, > > > > just saw this fly by with blead sy

FYI: warnings when compiling regcomp.c

can' might be used uninitialized in this function Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Mar 20 13:11:02 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. "Remember: If the game let's you

Re: Reworked Trie Patch

iple patterns at once (e.g. foo|fool|fab) I am not sure if the result will be the same methd your patch used, or something worse or better. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Mar 13 11:43:39 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on ht

[PATCH] pad_push() parm removal + minor refactoring

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, Any wrote: >I'll limit the scope here of my patch and make sure I'm doing the right >thing. Yves will be glad to know that I removed trailing whitespace >from three lines along the way. :-) >The has_flags parm is removed from pad_push(), and I've refacto

Re: (blead patch) New TRIE regex patch

h word the accepting state is for. Do you also plan to collate the states from the end? Like in (call|ball) the "all" could maybe stored/handled together. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Wed Mar 2 21:01:58 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://blood

Re: bignum pragma

bignum" should do. Just turn of converting "123" into Math::BigInt->new(123), or also add numify() to each MBI object? At which place should it do this? Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Mon Feb 28 19:34:07 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloo

Re: CPAN cruft cleanup?

ly keep only the last two versions, the most recent and one older in case of teething problems with the newest one. Seems most authors didn't get that memo :) Somebody could scan a (local) CPAN mirror, and find any module with more than lets say 5 versions, then send the author an

[perl #34124] ( $a ? : ) not parsed correctl

d $i"' 15 0 15 # perl -le '$a=10;$d=0; $i = ( $a ? $a += 5 : $d ) += 3; print "$a $d $i"' 18 0 18 # perl -le '$a=10;$d=0;$i = $a ? $a += 5 : $d += 3; print "$a $d $i"' 18 0 18 HTH, Tels - -- Signed on Sun Feb 13 18:19:33 2005 with key 0x93B84

Re: [PATCH] BigInt mbi_rand.t failings (solved now)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Thursday 10 February 2005 03:25, Ed Allen Smith wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on 9 February 2005 > 21:44:22 > > +0100), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tels) wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > >Moin, &

Re: [PATCH] BigInt mbi_rand.t failings (solved now)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, the attached patch should cure the problem and the smokes - finally. Steve Hay was so kind to test it and it really seems to work now. Sorry that it took so long, Tels - -- Signed on Wed Feb 9 21:43:02 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo

Re: [PATCH] BigInt mbi_rand.t failings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin Steve, On Thursday 27 January 2005 12:12, Steve Hay wrote: > Tels wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > >Moin, > >Ugh :-/ > > > >Can you please run mbi_rand.t manually: > > > > perl t/mbi

Re: [PATCH] BigInt mbi_rand.t failings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Wednesday 26 January 2005 18:07, Steve Hay wrote: > Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > >Tels wrote: > >>Fix, fix, fix, fix the stupid bugs... the attached patch *should* > >> cure the mbi_rand.t failings that are so common after

Re: [PATCH] BigInt mbi_rand.t failings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Wednesday 26 January 2005 18:07, Steve Hay wrote: > Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > >Tels wrote: > >>Fix, fix, fix, fix the stupid bugs... the attached patch *should* > >> cure the mbi_rand.t failings that are so common after

[PATCH] BigInt mbi_rand.t failings

the little bone from my left little finger tells me I am right :) Thanx to Jarkko for kicking my butt. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Tue Jan 25 18:03:11 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email

[perl #33826] FW: Cygwin Perl bug -- pod2usage(-verbose => 0) & pod2usage(-verbose => 1)

ending style. Since I do not have Cygwin, I cannot test this. Hope this helps, Tels - -- Signed on Wed Jan 19 17:51:48 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. "Schau, schau, Schoschonen.&

Re: Set::Object + Set::Scalar - Set::Scalar::Universe

n, I hope. > >Just to follow up, the new version without the complicated parts of the >Set::Scalar API is now up on CPAN as Set::Object 1.08_02 and ready for >people to test it. Documented this time, too. > >Tels? :) Please Cc: me, I am not subscribed to p5p :-) Also, I am curre

Re: [perl #33106] perl does not warn if the argument eq "NaN"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 09 January 2005 04:56, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 10:12:15PM +0100, Tels wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > > Moin, > > > > On Friday 07 January 2005 22:04, Yit

Re: [perl #33106] perl does not warn if the argument eq "NaN"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Friday 07 January 2005 22:04, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes via RT wrote: > perl -MO=Deparse -e'print 0 * 9**999' # perl -MO=Deparse -e'print inf' print inf $_; -e syntax OK Hm :o) Cheers, Tels - -- Sig

Re: [PATCH] Remove Carp from warnings.pm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Friday 07 January 2005 17:31, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > > Jim Cromie wrote: > > > heres Tels' patch again (against 23724), this time with the > > >

Re: [perl #33106] perl does not warn if the argument eq "NaN"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Friday 07 January 2005 13:35, Nicholas Clark wrote: > $ perl -le 'print 0+"0x1"' Yuck! :-( Why is "0x1" + 0 == 0 (also for 0b11) but "012" + 0 = 12? Tels - -- Signed on Fri Jan 7 14:16:28 2005 with key

Re: [perl #33106] perl does not warn if the argument eq "NaN"

perl was relying on atof() to honour > commitments in the man page that "0x1" numifies to 0 You mean numifies to 1? 0x1 is 1. As it should be :-) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> perl -le 'print 0x1' 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> perl -le 'printf "%g\n&qu

Re: [perl #33106] perl does not warn if the argument eq "NaN"

n't found a way to > get a negative nan though. Ah, damn. I shouldnt have asked - you are telling me there are negative NanS? Ouch.. I shoulda have sticked to positive integers only...*sigh* Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Thu Jan 6 21:22:10 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery

Re: Smoke [5.9.2] 23756 FAIL(X) openbsd 3.6 (i386/1 cpu)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Thursday 06 January 2005 20:05, Abe Timmerman wrote: > Op een zonnige winterdag (Thursday 06 January 2005 17:11),schreef Tels: > > Moin, > > > Since the integration of Math::BigInt v1.74, Math::BigRat v0.14, > > > bignum

Re: Smoke [5.9.2] 23756 FAIL(X) openbsd 3.6 (i386/1 cpu)

the random seed to reproduce the failure). I bet the div() shortcut in Calc is the culprit. The random tests are specifically designed to catch such things (glad they did). I have to revise that shortcut if it is not working on some systems. Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Thu

Re: [PATCH] Remove Carp from warnings.pm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On Sunday 02 January 2005 03:48, Jim Cromie wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:06:06 +0100, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BUT: (theres always a but...) > > lib/vars..ok > lib/vars_carp.

  1   2   >