Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
Douglas Hunter wrote:
[snip]
branch ONE_BOTTLE # 'bout time for a liver transplant
ONE_BOTTLE: # it's been fun
The ONE_BOTTLE label isn't gone to by anything else in the program, and
the one instruction which does go to it, is immediately before it.
So, what's
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:53:22PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
And it also seems to want (by reading the makefile) bison and flex,
No, the generated files are in CVS. If there is a timestamp problem,
just touch imcparser.* and imclexer.c. And of course there are
Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
The ONE_BOTTLE label isn't gone to by anything else in the program, and
the one instruction which does go to it, is immediately before it.
So, what's the reason for it?
Lack of experience. Thanks for the pointer.
-- dug
At 9:00 AM -0500 3/20/03, Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
The suggestion was made last week that I try filtering the compiled
BASIC stuff through IMCC for performance reasons and whatnot.
The suggestion was also made (by me!) that I could produce a
milestone binary for Windows for distribution.
Well,
Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
The suggestion was made last week that I try filtering the compiled
BASIC stuff through IMCC for performance reasons and whatnot.
IMCC seems to want headers that MSVC++ isn't happy with:
cl -nologo -O1 -MD -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE -DNO_STRICT
At 12:00 AM + 3/20/03, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthijs Van Duin) writes:
OK, I suppose that works although that still means you're moving the
complexity from the perl implementation to its usage: in this case,
the perl 6 parser which is written in perl 6
No, I don't believe
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 05:32:39PM -0500, James Mastros wrote:
On 03/14/2003 3:22 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
That means that TPF's perl development grant fund is fine to donate
to, and if there's only enough cash for one grantee, and Larry's the
best candidate, that's keen. Setting up a Fund
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, David Storrs wrote:
Folks, give us your address (or a PO box, or something), where we can
send checks. The checks won't be tax deductible, but are we really
doing this for the tax deduction?
... or a PayPal account. I've got $1.36 in my account ready to send to
the
--- Matthijs van Duin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:46:50PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
They should be though, if a variable was hypothesized when the
continuation was taken, then it should be hypothesized when that
continuation is invoked.
Should they? Does
On Mar-21, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
I think that this would make life easier for everyone. (because it also
saves
the 3 or 4 people on the list having to read tedious e-mail messages from
people about the subject)
I'm currently not sure, if there are 4 people around,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:38:31AM -0800, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
Here's what I take to be a (scheme) prototype of Matthijs' success
continuations approach. It actually works mostly by passing closures and
a state object, ...
Matthijs -- is this what you're describing?
It sounds like approach #2
Oops, I just noticed Sean had mailed Dan and me privately, not on the list..
sorry for sending the reply here :-)
--
Matthijs van Duin -- May the Forth be with you!
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:53:22PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
And of course there are
flex/bisons for Win out there somewhere, if one wants actually change
the .l/.y sources.
Could we bodge round this by adding a Configure.pl flag to suppress adding
the rules to use
David == David Storrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Such a fund would be the ideal but, until it is set up, there is a
David very easy way to fund the design team:
David Folks, give us your address (or a PO box, or something), where we can
David send checks. The checks won't be tax
14 matches
Mail list logo
