On Apr 19, 2007, at 8:18 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:47:55AM -0700, Andy Dougherty wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #42620]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL:
On 4/20/07, Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:18:41AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
This does prompt the question of removing -G from the tests,
but the last time I looked into doing this (about a
Browder, Tom writes:
Where can I see this list's archived mail? The link on
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ is broken from
here.
Google Groups works for me:
http://groups.google.com/group/perl.perl6.language/topics
(Though I've some memory of previously establishing the
Where can I see this list's archived mail? The link on
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ is broken from
here.
Thanks.
-Tom
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:47:55AM -0700, Andy Dougherty wrote:
t/compilers/pge/p5regex/p5rx.Parrot VM: PANIC: Out of mem!
I believe that both of these tests are currently being run with
the -G flag, which should mean that
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
After a lot of discussion on the mailing
list and in #parrot I think it was decided that running the
tests with -G was preferable to having random test failures
showing up in the pge tests due to GC problems in Parrot.
On 4/20/07, Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
After a lot of discussion on the mailing
list and in #parrot I think it was decided that running the
tests with -G was preferable to having random test failures
Just to say that the pkgsrc team accepted by patch and parrot 0.4.11 is
now in pkgsrc.
The NetBSD project make bulkbuilds on different architectures and OS
of the whole pkgsrc tree publishing the compilation results.
This will be useful for testing the portability on non-wide-use archs.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:18:41AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
This does prompt the question of removing -G from the tests,
but the last time I looked into doing this (about a month ago) Parrot
still had intermittent GC errors that
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:18:41AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
This does prompt the question of removing -G from the tests,
but the last time I looked into doing this (about a
On 4/13/07, Agent Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/07, Moritz Lenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found out that after the smoke test a new smoke.yml is in the
repository's root, but no smoke.html.
[...]
I guess that t/xx-uncategorized/value_alias_readonly.t is indeed the
last
在 Apr 20, 2007 7:45 PM 時，Agent Zhang 寫到：
On 4/13/07, Agent Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I think I've fixed the bug by defaulting to YAML.pm instead of
YAML::Syck. As confirmed by Ingy++, The current version of YAML::Syck
on CPAN is having problem with single-quotes in its emitter:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, chromatic via RT wrote:
On Thursday 19 April 2007 11:35, Andy Dougherty wrote:
While trying to run 'make test' today, t/stm/llqueue_2.pir hung and had
to be killed manually. Trying it again, I got an out-of-memory error
The hanging behavior appears to be
On Apr 20, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:47:55AM -0700, Andy Dougherty wrote:
t/compilers/pge/p5regex/p5rx.Parrot VM: PANIC: Out of
mem!
I believe that both of these tests are
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Joshua Isom via RT wrote:
On Apr 20, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Andy Dougherty wrote:
As far as I know, --gc-debug doesn't actually do anything at all. How
much ram do you have available when you start running the test? You
might be doing a lot of swapping in and out of
Fixed in revision 18292. I carried over to these tests code I used in
t/tools/pmc2cutils/*.t,
where it was more needed.
The patch I applied has been overridden by further patches (r18291-18292)
applied in response
to RT 42618.
On 4/19/07, Allison Randal via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a test case that shows where the current behavior is incorrect?
The attached test case demonstrates that passing NULL from C into PIR,
then passing that value to Cnew, causes the wrong init method to be
called. Yes, it's
18 matches
Mail list logo
