hi attached a patch that changes some files and test files to replace the
.pcc_sub directive to .sub.
Note that the .pcc_sub directive is still used in PASM mode, and this is not
changing right now (but maybe in the future?).
This patch prepares the change of imcc.y, which is to be updated to
Is anyone else seeing a large # of copies of ptc's messages to p2
lately?
On Sep 15, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
Hi everyone,
I finally managed to get the 'make cover' target working so that we
can now see the test coverage of the C-language parts of Parrot.
kid51++ (Jim Keenan)
On Sun Sep 16 03:50:48 2007, kjs wrote:
On Thu Sep 13 19:19:14 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Klaas-Jan Stol (via RT) wrote:
Therefore, in order to keep IMCC simple and remove syntax
redundancy, I
propose to remove the .pcc_sub directive from IMCC.
Agreed. If there are any
Bob Rogers wrote:
one could argue it's perl.org's fault for not discarding
duplicates.
-- Bob Rogers
I corresponded with ask earlier today and, as usual, he is on the case.
I did get a delay email from gmail. So either gmail's servers are
screwed up and accidently resending the same email repeatedly and not
knowing it succeeded or perl.org's mail servers are screwed up and
making gmail think it needs to be delayed when it's actually sent. But
it's my first time
From: Joshua Isom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:09:31 -0500
I did get a delay email from gmail. So either gmail's servers are
screwed up and accidently resending the same email repeatedly and not
knowing it succeeded or perl.org's mail servers are screwed up and
