Re: CPANTS preview

2004-07-28 Thread Nick Ing-Simmons
Thomas Klausner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Personally, I'm annoyed by dist that I cannot remove after installation. If files are read-only, I'll have to do extra steps during deleting. So I like dists which no read-only files. Which is why it's a Kwalitee indicator. If we (whoever is interested in

Re: CPANTS preview - coverage in CPAN testers reports

2004-07-24 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Thomas Klausner wrote: - Test coverage. Impossibly, because CPANTS does not run code. But it could fetch it from some other place that does it, right ? What about adding (optional) coverage reports to the reports the CPAN testers send in ? Gabor

Re: CPANTS preview

2004-07-24 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:41:58AM +0200, James Mastros wrote: - Having POD - Not having the POD that h2xs puts in I wonder how many dists are authored by R.U. Thor :-) - Having a README thats allready covered. BTW, I tend to think that modules that require lots of other things

Re: CPANTS preview - coverage in CPAN testers reports

2004-07-24 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Thomas Klausner wrote: What about adding (optional) coverage reports to the reports the CPAN testers send in ? That might be a good idea. But AFAIK, coverage reports can vary greatly on different platforms/Perls/installed modules IMHO this is exactly the reason it can

Re: CPANTS preview - coverage in CPAN testers reports

2004-07-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:05:06PM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Thomas Klausner wrote: What about adding (optional) coverage reports to the reports the CPAN testers send in ? That might be a good idea. But AFAIK, coverage reports can vary greatly on different

Re: CPANTS preview

2004-07-23 Thread James Mastros
Paul Johnson wrote: At the moment the focus seems very much on packaging. That's fine, but it does mean that correctly packaged junk looks pretty good. In time, some more metrics would be good. Some suggestions: - How do the CPAN testers reports look? - What does cpanratings think? - Some

Re: CPANTS preview

2004-07-23 Thread Tony Bowden
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:41:58AM +0200, James Mastros wrote: BTW, I tend to think that modules that require lots of other things deserve lower kwalitee... Because reinventing the wheel is a good thing, right? Tony

CPANTS preview

2004-07-22 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I ran CPANTS today, you can view results here: http://cpants.dev.zsi.at/ ( or http://test1.dev.zsi.at if DNS isn't updated..) in /metrics there is a yaml-file for each dist cpants.db (or cpants.db.gz) is a SQLite DB file Oh, there might be a bug, because 100 dists didn't get any

Re: CPANTS preview

2004-07-22 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:28:08PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: Hi! I ran CPANTS today, you can view results here: Oooh. Nice http://cpants.dev.zsi.at/ ( or http://test1.dev.zsi.at if DNS isn't updated..) in /metrics there is a yaml-file for each dist cpants.db (or cpants.db.gz) is

Re: CPANTS preview

2004-07-22 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:25:38PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: Max Kwalitee is 10, which is reached by 99 dists. Will it go up to eleven soon? :-) as I'm planning to go on vacation next week, probably not... is_prereq (is listed as PREREQ by at least 3 other dists) Is it

Re: CPANTS preview

2004-07-22 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:28:08PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: Hi! I ran CPANTS today, you can view results here: http://cpants.dev.zsi.at/ ( or http://test1.dev.zsi.at if DNS isn't updated..) in /metrics there is a yaml-file for each dist cpants.db (or cpants.db.gz) is a SQLite

Re: CPANTS preview

2004-07-22 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:25:38PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:28:08PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: Hi! I ran CPANTS today, you can view results here: Oooh. Nice Agreed. I think it is a great start. Thanks very much for your work. Max Kwalitee is