On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:58:21PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Sam, please follow Parrot dev (or stop spreading FUD) - thanks.
Be gentle, please. Parrot needs language developers. I'm not saying
you're right or wrong. I'm just asking you to be a little more
diplomatic.
--
Chip Salzenberg <
On Aug 23, 2005, at 20:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I do agree with test-driven development. That is exactly the
approach I
took.
Well, I agree - until I see such tests (pyint_1):
$P2 = $P1.__abs__($P1)
Take a look at the difference between r7254 and r7312.
I just
Kevin Tew wrote:
>>
> Point well taken, I've been leaning back between, rewrite and evolving
> your work.
> I have a current change set that is passing most of your original tests
> that are in t/dynclasses/py*.t
> It is more of an evolution than a rewrite, which I favor.
> Some test fail due to re
My current work.
Python PMC Patch to leo5-cxt5
Sam, Thanks for the comments,
They were very much appreciated.
Sam Ruby wrote:
>I added self on Leo's request. Now it is unneccessary. *shrug*
>
I understand completely.
>Check out parrot/t/dynclass/pyint_2.pmc. __add__ style methods were
>working, and tested.
>
Yes many are working, I shou
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>> I do agree with test-driven development. That is exactly the approach I
>> took.
>
> Well, I agree - until I see such tests (pyint_1):
>
> $P2 = $P1.__abs__($P1)
Take a look at the difference between r7254 and r7312.
The tests originally passed without a self a
On Aug 23, 2005, at 18:21, Sam Ruby wrote:
Kevin Tew wrote:
We don't have to pass self around, parrot
makes it available to us automatically.
I added self on Leo's request. Now it is unneccessary. *shrug*
Parrot's new calling conventions are passing 'self' as the first
argument of
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:35:39PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 17:09, Kevin Tew wrote:
> >Problem:
> >Python PMC's just don't work in the leo-cxt5 branch which will become
> >head/trunk at some time in the hopefully not to distant future.
>
> Err, I hope to merge RSN ;-)
T
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:21:42PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Kevin Tew wrote:
> > I've ripped out a lot of the explicit passing of self as the first
> > argument of pmc methods. - We don't have to pass self around, parrot
> > makes it available to us automatically.
>
> I added self on Leo's reques
On Aug 23, 2005, at 17:09, Kevin Tew wrote:
Problem:
Python PMC's just don't work in the leo-cxt5 branch which will become
head/trunk at some time in the hopefully not to distant future.
Err, I hope to merge RSN ;-)
I had a conversation a long time ago with Dan, in which he agreed that
giv
Kevin Tew wrote:
> Problem:
> Python PMC's just don't work in the leo-cxt5 branch which will become
> head/trunk at some time in the hopefully not to distant future.
>
> What I've done up time now:
> I've ported pyint.pmc, pystring.pmc to pass all tests in leo-cxt5
> I've written t/dynclasses/pyst
11 matches
Mail list logo
