Re: Build and Installation of modules should be implementation specific (Was: Re: 6PAN Spec question)

2008-12-23 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Daniel Ruoso wrote: Em Seg, 2008-12-22 às 15:06 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu: On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Overmeer wrote: For ???B. In the current set-up, you use CPAN.pm to download, and then install. The 'cpan' script is a wrapper around CPAN.pm. CPAN.pm starts

Build and Installation of modules should be implementation specific (Was: Re: 6PAN Spec question)

2008-12-22 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Seg, 2008-12-22 às 15:06 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu: On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Overmeer wrote: For ???B. In the current set-up, you use CPAN.pm to download, and then install. The 'cpan' script is a wrapper around CPAN.pm. CPAN.pm starts the install tool. A more convient

Re: 6PAN Spec question

2008-12-21 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Mark Overmeer wrote: * Timothy S. Nelson (wayl...@wayland.id.au) [081220 03:45]: Btw, looks like I was wrong about the terminology of CPAN6/6PAN/whatever. See link below for details (the new Terminology section).

Re: 6PAN Spec question

2008-12-20 Thread Mark Overmeer
* Timothy S. Nelson (wayl...@wayland.id.au) [081220 03:45]: Btw, looks like I was wrong about the terminology of CPAN6/6PAN/whatever. See link below for details (the new Terminology section). http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/Perl6/Spec/S22-package-format.pod I do not understand

Re: 6PAN Spec question

2008-12-19 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
Btw, looks like I was wrong about the terminology of CPAN6/6PAN/whatever. See link below for details (the new Terminology section). http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/Perl6/Spec/S22-package-format.pod :) - | Name:

Re: 6PAN Spec question

2008-12-18 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu: My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN Package format (layout, metadata, etc), and I'd suggest that it also include the

Re: 6PAN Spec question

2008-12-18 Thread Mark Overmeer
* Daniel Ruoso (dan...@ruoso.com) [081218 13:39]: Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu: My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN Package format (layout,

Re: 6PAN Spec question

2008-12-18 Thread jerry gay
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:45, Mark Overmeer m...@overmeer.net wrote: * Daniel Ruoso (dan...@ruoso.com) [081218 13:39]: Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu: My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final version of the 6PAN spec? I'm

Re: 6PAN Spec question

2008-12-18 Thread Mark Overmeer
* jerry gay (jerry@gmail.com) [081218 14:01]: If you understand my explanation of CPAN6, then you certainly must be ware that 6PAN and CPAN6 have nothing to do with each other. Please do not use them in combination. It is as silly as saying TCP/Linux there's a difference? that was

CPAN6 vs. 6PAN (was: Re: 6PAN Spec question)

2008-12-18 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
Mark, am I right in putting it like this? 6PAN: - Perl6 package format - Client-side part of CPAN CPAN6: - Server-side part of CPAN (with more stuff) Is that how you see it? :) - |

Re: 6PAN Spec question

2008-12-18 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Daniel Ruoso wrote: Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu: My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN Package format (layout, metadata, etc), and

Re: 6PAN Spec question

2008-12-18 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Timothy S. Nelson wrote: Are there any objections if I refactor the current S22 into 3 parts, and retain the .jib files stuff in the current S22 (renamed to S22-package-format.pod), a document containing what S22 said about CPAN6 (which we could then donate to the cpan6

6PAN Spec question

2008-12-17 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN Package format (layout, metadata, etc), and I'd suggest that it also include the layout of packages on the 6PAN server. Some have suggested a particular