/20120206/f2089dfd/attachment.png
for possible explanation?
--
Regards,
Alexander
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/aef1f509/attachment.html
I get this error with implicit none:
[ 0%] Building Fortran object
CMakeFiles/petsc.dir/src/dm/f90-mod/petscdmmod.F.o
/Users/markadams/Codes/petsc-dev/include/finclude/ftn-custom/petscdmcomposite.h90:8.49:
Included at
Fredrik,
This question belongs on petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov since it involves
additions/extensions to PETSc so I am moving the discussion over to there.
We have not done the required work to have ghosted vectors work with CUSP
yet, so this will require some additions to PETSc. We
://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/13180f67/attachment.html
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/0a0a031f/attachment.html
messy.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/3b696c04/attachment.html
before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/b17f38a8
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I don't like this because it would mean calling VecSetUp() all over the
place. Couldn't the ghosting flag be on the same
level as the sizes?
Maybe VecSetUp() is wrong
results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/9042d194/attachment.html
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I don't like this because it would mean
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/9bca81f0/attachment.html
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/1e984fb0/attachment.html
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew
interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/9b237c05/attachment.html
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM,
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/e0e80b7d/attachment.html
/attachments/20120206/e6fc9044/attachment.html
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM,
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120206/1931088a/attachment.html
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:42 PM,
/attachments/20120206/a5497141/attachment.html
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:02 PM,
-dev/attachments/20120206/0244d1e3/attachment.html
Please DO NOT put applications at the end of the petscapp.bib file; always
put them in the right section: you can search for name= to find the section
beginnings.
Please fix all the incorrect ones below and put them where they belong.
Thanks
Barry
User friendly
On Feb 6, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 22:11, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On the other hand you could argue that ALL vector types should support
ghosting as a natural thing (with sequential vectors just have 0 length
ghosts conceptually) then it
27 matches
Mail list logo
