On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 22:11, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On the other hand you could argue that ALL vector types should support
ghosting as a natural thing (with sequential vectors just have 0 length
ghosts conceptually) then it would be desirable to allow setting the ghost
Fredrik,
This question belongs on petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov since it involves
additions/extensions to PETSc so I am moving the discussion over to there.
We have not done the required work to have ghosted vectors work with CUSP
yet, so this will require some additions to PETSc. We
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Fredrik,
This question belongs on petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov since it involves
additions/extensions to PETSc so I am moving the discussion over to there.
We have not done the required work to have ghosted
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 20:35, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
VecCreate()
VecSetType()
VecSetGhosted()
Is there a compelling reason for memory to be allocated before VecSetUp()?
Deferring it would make
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I don't like this because it would mean calling VecSetUp() all over the
place. Couldn't the ghosting flag be on the same
level as the sizes?
Maybe VecSetUp() is wrong because that would imply collective. This memory
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I don't like this because it would mean calling VecSetUp() all over the
place. Couldn't the ghosting flag be on the same
level as the sizes?
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I don't like this because it would mean calling VecSetUp() all over the
place. Couldn't the ghosting flag be on the same
level as the sizes?
Maybe VecSetUp() is wrong
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I don't like this because it would mean calling VecSetUp() all over the
place. Couldn't the
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
I don't like this because it would mean
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 21:42, Matthew
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jed
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM,
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM,
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:14 PM,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM,
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:30
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:42 PM,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:50
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:02 PM,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:06
On Feb 6, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 22:11, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On the other hand you could argue that ALL vector types should support
ghosting as a natural thing (with sequential vectors just have 0 length
ghosts conceptually) then it
24 matches
Mail list logo
