On Friday 05 September 2003 01:11, Henning Brauer wrote:
> thanks for proving that you don't understand what you are doing.
> "my dick is bigger than yours" doesn't work when modifying memory
> aloocation affecting shitz in kernel land.
Wonderbar !
Ed
Hi,
quoting from http://www.openbsd.org/34.html
"packet tagging (e.g. filter on tags added by bridge based on MAC address) "
Please tell me everything about it ;-)
Ed
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:14:53PM +0200, Ed White wrote:
> quoting from http://www.openbsd.org/34.html
>
> "packet tagging (e.g. filter on tags added by bridge based on MAC address) "
>
> Please tell me everything about it ;-)
simple.
from brconfig(8):
# brconfig bridge0 rule pass in on f
On Friday 05 September 2003 13:03, Henning Brauer wrote:
> We also modified the matching so that _every_ matching rule sets the
> tag, not just the last one.
This means multiple tags for one packet, right ?
Ed
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Ed White wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2003 13:03, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > We also modified the matching so that _every_ matching rule sets the
> > tag, not just the last one.
>
> This means multiple tags for one packet, right ?
No, there is only one
ehm... I know this is the right place to ask about network interfaces
experiences... so I'm wondering if anyone had good results with USB
(wireless/ethernet) network adapters on OpenBSD.
I've an old laptop with only one PCMCIA slot and would like to add 1 ethernet
and 1 wireless adapter... so
Whoa, wait a minute, I wasn't attempting to insult anyone, why did you reply
like that? I was just offering a solution I thought may help, and I posted
it to this list so if I was wrong someone could say so, but I wasn't trying
to say I am the authority on it or anything otherwise I would not have
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Ed White wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2003 13:03, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > We also modified the matching so that _every_ matching rule sets the
> > tag, not just the last one.
>
> This means multiple tags for one packet, right ?
no. one tag per packet
while pointing out that this can be changed via ukc is helpfull, 32786
is just insanity.
sorry, it doesn't work like that.
do some math.
see how much kernel memory you waste.
use your tools and see what you really need.
hint: it's most likley 2048 or 4096 max.
we've had posts to our mailing lists
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:33:57PM +0200, Ed White wrote:
>
> ehm... I know this is the right place to ask about network interfaces
> experiences... so I'm wondering if anyone had good results with USB
> (wireless/ethernet) network adapters on OpenBSD.
USB wifi adapters don't work. Most have
Thank you Henning, That's what I was looking for from my original post. :D.
That also explains to me why when I set it to 64 instead of 32 it didn't
boot, lol. I never could figure that one out until now. Also, the
NMBCLUSTERS , is megabytes, kilobytes, bytes or some other
measurement.
Am
Hello Jolan,
Friday, September 5, 2003, 11:53:39 AM, you wrote:
Jolan> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:33:57PM +0200, Ed White wrote:
>>
>> ehm... I know this is the right place to ask about network interfaces
>> experiences... so I'm wondering if anyone had good results with USB
>> (wireless/ethe
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:47:58AM -0400, Amir Seyavash Mesry wrote:
> Thank you Henning, That's what I was looking for from my original post. :D.
> That also explains to me why when I set it to 64 instead of 32 it didn't
> boot, lol. I never could figure that one out until now. Also, the
> NMBCLUS
On Friday 05 September 2003 16:46, Henning Brauer wrote:
> @1 pass in from 1.1.1.1 tag test
> @2 pass in from 1.1.1.1
>
> assuming a packet from 1.1.1.1 comes in:
> the last matchin rule is @2. it does not have a "tag" statement.
> but: @1 matched before, and even given it is not last (final) match
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 06:59:20PM +0200, Ed White wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2003 16:46, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > @1 pass in from 1.1.1.1 tag test
> > @2 pass in from 1.1.1.1
> >
> > assuming a packet from 1.1.1.1 comes in:
> > the last matchin rule is @2. it does not have a "tag" statement.
The pf user's guide mentions redirection primarily for incoming
traffic but tonight I had an unusual situation to deal with where an
unknown client somewhere on a 150 square mile wireless LAN was infected
with Welchia.
I played with rdr to force this person's outbound http requests to all
16 matches
Mail list logo
