> On Aug 22, 2014, at 7:15 PM, Kevin Gerrard wrote:
>
> I realize that this May seem like a dumb question for one of the developers.
There's not much traffic on this pf list. You might have better luck asking on
the openbsd misc list, there are a lot more people subscribed to that one.
Did y
0 at sk0 phy 0: XaQti Corp. XMAC II Gigabit PHY, rev. 2
Any suggestions on reducing the interrupt load to the previous levels?
Thanks...
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
California Sta
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Jedi/Sector One wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:24:36PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > We're running an X86 box with 512MB ram, nmbclusters = 8192, nkmempages =
> > 81920
>
> Didn't Cedric say that nkmempages > 16384 on x86 was inst
up to about 1.3mil
states before it died. I don't think you'll get any higher than this, as I
recall at 1.3mil the kernel was using something like 480MB. Adding more
physical memory actually decreases the amount of usable kernel memory...
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.
d
balancing/failover :).
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
uties :(... I could however host a development
environment.
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
?
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 869-3781 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
lineno++;
this appears to give the correct line numbers.
Thoughts?
Thanks...
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 869-3781 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
he in line comments into 3.1 (as I
think that would be easier than backporting string concatenation) and then
convert to this syntax for 3.2.
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 869-3781 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Philipp Buehler wrote:
> On 13/08/2002, francisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote To Paul B. Henson:
> > > foonets = "{ 10.0.0.0/24, # subnet blah
> > > 10.0.1.0/24, # important stuff
> > > 10.0.2.0/24 # don'
I don't really want to have a comment before the variable definition, as
there will be anywhere from dozens to hundreds of subnets.
Thanks...
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 869-3781 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
11 matches
Mail list logo