On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:30 PM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 11/21/22 15:05, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
> >
> > In fact, David Johnston did unequivocally challenge my strawman a couple
> of turns back, thus:
> >
>
>
> And the equivocal additions later in the post:
>
Yeah, even when I try to be
On 11/21/22 15:05, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
...why the "Nobody supports it!" statement for a recommendation that only
appeared at the same time? I for one have a poor record of mind reading and/or predicting
the future:)
Here’s what I wrote in the post that
On 22 Nov 2022, at 10:05, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
> Because PG allows a cluster to have as many superusers as you please, and
> because any one of these can create or drop another, any convention in this
> space needs some extra mechanisms to enforce it..
>
> … effectively tamper-proof
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:05 PM Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
>
> I believe that the fact that a superuser's ability to start a session can
> be limited by what the "hba_file" says is critical here—together with the
> fact that the ability to edit this file is governed by the regime of O/S
> users and
> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
>
>> b...@yugabyte.com wrote:
>>
>> Consider this wording. It also uses “good practice”.
>>
>> «
>> It is good practice to limit the number of superuser roles that exist in a
>> cluster to exactly one: the inevitable bootstrap superuser. This recognizes
>>
On 11/21/22 11:46, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
Nobody supports it!
I went back through the thread and don't anywhere when you made the
above statement, correct me if I am wrong. In that case there was
nothing to support or not support until now. What people where
responding to the title of the
> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
>
>> b...@yugabyte.com:
>>
>> Consider this wording. It also uses “good practice”.
>> «
>> It is good practice to limit the number of superuser roles that exist in a
>> cluster to exactly one: the inevitable bootstrap superuser. This recognizes
>> the fact
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:40 AM Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
>
> Consider this wording. It also uses “good practice”.
>
> «
> It is good practice to limit the number of superuser roles that exist in a
> cluster to exactly one: the inevitable bootstrap superuser. This recognizes
> the fact that, once
On 11/21/22 9:40 AM, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
Then there’s this (from the doc):
It is good practice to create a role that has the CREATEDB and CREATEROLE
privileges, but is not a superuser, and then use this role for all routine
management of databases and
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:12 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:01 AM Dominique Devienne
> wrote:
> > FWIW, I've been using https://github.com/arangodb/linenoise-ng for Linux
> > and Windows,
>
> I've look at linenoise and without tab/autocomplete it's not worth the
> effort,
> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
>
>> karsten.hilb...@gmx.net:
>>
>>> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com wrote:
>>>
b...@yugabyte.com
Thanks to all who offered their views on my question. It seems that
different people will reach different conclusions. I’ll take this as
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:58 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> It'd certainly be nice if we could use Readline on Windows. I do not
> think we want to buy into maintaining our own fork of Readline, if that's
> what you're trying to suggest. If it "just works" now, that'd be great.
>
Okay, we should know
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:58 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Kirk Wolak writes:
> > We have our team of Windows developers, leveraging PSQL. But honestly,
> > it feels crippled after using PSQL in Linux for any length of time. Losing
> > auto-complete sucks (multi-line query recall/editing is lost as
Kirk Wolak writes:
> We have our team of Windows developers, leveraging PSQL. But honestly,
> it feels crippled after using PSQL in Linux for any length of time. Losing
> auto-complete sucks (multi-line query recall/editing is lost as well).
> In researching this problem, it appears that
First,
I wanted to send this to the developers (hackers) list. But the
instructions are clear that initial posts don't go there (try elsewhere
first). So playing by the rules here...
*Background:*
We have our team of Windows developers, leveraging PSQL. But honestly,
it feels crippled
Hello, it’s Myles over at https://CanaDAO.org. We’re planning to port and
adapt https://liquidfeedback.org on top of the Ethereum Virtual Machine.
We’re looking for a full PostGres port on top of Radix/Notoros (running in a
write once read many paradigm of course, due to on chain
fyi.
The issue was fixed with this PR.
https://github.com/adjust/parquet_fdw/pull/60
Thanks,
Vijay
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 7:59 PM Vijaykumar Sampat Jain <
vijaykumar.sampat.j...@adjust.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 7:15 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think it's most likely a bug in
17 matches
Mail list logo
