- out of line parameters
How to? Is there any function for this? I mean the C interface.
PQexecParams.
- escape the nulls, like \0
Do you mean this function?
#unsigned char *PQescapeBytea(const unsigned char *from,
# size_t from_length,
#
Tom Lane wrote:
Hah, I've got it. (Should have searched Red Hat's bugzilla sooner.)
What you are hitting is a glibc bug, as explained here:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2007-10/msg00010.html
If libpthread is loaded after first use of dcgettext, then subsequent
uses are at risk of
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:08:47PM +0100, Christian Schröder wrote:
By the way, does the --enable-thread-safety switch have anything to do
with the problem?
No, that only affects the client library, it doesn't affect the
server...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL
In response to Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 12:02 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Frequently, when people ask for help because they've exceed max_fsm*,
it's because they're not paying attention to their systems, and therefore
the problem has been occurring for a while
On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:55 PM, Steve Manes wrote:
Steve Manes wrote:
What's the portupgrade process in FreeBSD??
(Fixed. The answer is to use pg_delete -f on the old package to
force the delete)
more elegantly,
portupgrade -Rrv -f -o databases/postgresql82-client postgresql-client
but
my understanding was that the lack of threading on OSX made it
especially poor for a DB server
What you're referring to must be that the kernel was essentially
single-threaded, with a single kernel-funnel lock. (Because the OS
certainly supported threads, and it was certainly possible to write
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christian_Schr=F6der?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What remains inscrutable to me is why this problem did not arise
earlier. I cannot remember any changes that I have made to the system
recently. Or maybe it has been a defective update of the glibc? I did
not see in the bug
On Nov 12, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Sarah Dougherty wrote:
For some context, I am trying to create a report that provides a
list of client charges and payments and a running balance after
each transaction. Because we often have multiple charges and/or
payments on the same day, we can't use the
On Nov 12, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Mason Hale wrote:
After the wal segment file is copied by the restore_command
script, is it safe to delete it from my archive?
While I believe you can toss them immediately, you should
considering keeping those around
Hi
I have a table with 29384048 records in oracle and postgresql. The table has
47 columns (16 numeric and 27 varchar and the rest timestamp). The tablesize in
postgresql is twice as much than the tablesize in oracle (for the same number
of rows and columns). There are no updates or deletes
How does Postgres handle sharing database handles across child processes?
That is, if I have a process that opens a connection to the database and
then forks a few child processes, what happens?
Can the child processes safely use the handle?
If one child closes the handle, what happens to the
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:02:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does Postgres handle sharing database handles across child processes?
That is, if I have a process that opens a connection to the database and
then forks a few child processes, what happens?
Can the child processes safely
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:02:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does Postgres handle sharing database handles across child processes?
That is, if I have a process that opens a connection to the database and
then forks a few child
Il Tuesday 13 November 2007 17:36:30 SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH ha scritto:
Hi
I have a table with 29384048 records in oracle and postgresql. The table
has 47 columns (16 numeric and 27 varchar and the rest timestamp). The
tablesize in postgresql is twice as much than the tablesize in oracle (for
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:02:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does Postgres handle sharing database handles across child
processes?
That is, if I have a process that opens a connection to the database
and
then forks a few child
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 08:36 -0800, SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH wrote:
Hi
I have a table with 29384048 records in oracle and postgresql. The
table has 47 columns (16 numeric and 27 varchar and the rest
timestamp). The tablesize in postgresql is twice as much than the
tablesize in oracle (for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Yep, this is a fork without exec. And the child processes often aren't
even doing any database access -- the database connection's opened and
held, then a child is forked off, and the child 'helpfully' closes the
handle during the child's
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:18:25PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, this is a fork without exec. And the child processes often aren't
even doing any database access -- the database connection's opened and
held, then a child is forked off, and the child 'helpfully' closes the
handle during
On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, this is a fork without exec. And the child processes often aren't
even doing any database access -- the database connection's opened and
held, then a child is forked off, and the child 'helpfully' closes the
handle during the child's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Yep, this is a fork without exec. And the child processes often aren't
even doing any database access -- the database connection's opened and
held, then a child is forked off, and the child 'helpfully' closes the
handle during the child's
Beautiful, Scott. You nailed it. Thanks for the help!
-Original Message-
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 5:10 PM
To: Charles Mortell
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] update record with two-column primary key
OK, a
Given a table which includes tree-type information consisting of an id
and a parent_id, is there an already existing function that will return
the path to the top of the tree for a given record?
The connectby function from the contrib tablefuncs does what I want for
a whole table, but I
Suppose I have a large table with no indexes, and I scan the entire
thing. What is the impact on the shared buffers? I'm interested in
three scenarios:
- Scan done in SQL using SELECT, (via JDBC if it matters).
- Scan done using SQL COPY.
- Scan done using psql COPY.
I suspect that the SELECT
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 17:10 -0500, Morris Goldstein wrote:
I suspect that the SELECT scan will tend to displace everything else
in shared buffers, and I hope that the two forms of COPY do not. Is
that correct?
In 7.4 that may be true, but in later versions it's not.
8.0+ use multiple LRU
I was going through the docs for JDBC and came across connection
pooling within driver. At the same time it mentions that one should
use the Apache DBCP.
So now the question is which connection pool to use and why?
Regards
Dhaval Shah
---(end of
We are looking for a Postgresql Architect/Developer to do some mentoring,
training, knowledge transfer and implementation for a large media outlet in
Los Angeles. Travel is fully funded and the rates are great! Please reply
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your time!!!
Regards,
Ricky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:27:51 -0800
Rick Grandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are looking for a Postgresql Architect/Developer to do some
mentoring, training, knowledge transfer and implementation for a
large media outlet in Los Angeles. Travel is
On Nov 9, 2007 12:53 PM, Waller, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an application that I am porting from MySQL to PostgreSQL and I am
working on the import Perl script that process the data.
The data is web log data and each line has a variable amount of the fields
(mostly because of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Ugh, in testing I see some nastiness here without any explicit
require. It looks like there's an implicit require if the text
contains certain chars.
Exactly.
Looks like it's going to be very hard, unless someone has some
brilliant
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
Ugh, in testing I see some nastiness here without any explicit
require. It looks like there's an implicit require if the text
contains certain chars.
Exactly.
Looks like it's going to be very hard, unless someone has some
brilliant insight I'm missing
On Nov 13, 2007 3:35 PM, Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given a table which includes tree-type information consisting of an id
and a parent_id, is there an already existing function that will return
the path to the top of the tree for a given record?
The connectby function from the
Hi all -
I've spotted the cast-related regressions being discussed here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-11/msg00505.php
... as a Moodle developer supporting Pg, the stricter cast rules in pg
8.3 are somewhat worrying. Is there a straightforward way to configure a
given DB or a
Will Postgresql ever implement an ignore on error feature when bulk
loading data? Currently it is my understanding that any record that
violates a unique constraint will cause the copy from command to halt
execution instead of skipping over the violation and logging it - as is
done in Oracle
Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I say they are worrying because Moodle code has many ocurrences of
/* bla.id is an INT8 */
SELECT x,y,z FROM bla WHERE id='1';
And we also often quote INT values for inserts/updates, I am not sure if
this is supported either.
This is not a
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried something like that briefly and it failed. The trouble is, I
think, that since the engine tries a require it fails on the op test
before it even looks to see if the module is already loaded.
I think we have little choice but to report this as
Tom Lane wrote:
Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I say they are worrying because Moodle code has many ocurrences of
/* bla.id is an INT8 */
SELECT x,y,z FROM bla WHERE id='1';
And we also often quote INT values for inserts/updates, I am not sure if
this is supported either.
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 00:07 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Mason Hale wrote:
After the wal segment file is copied by the restore_command script, is
it safe to delete it from my archive?
While I believe you can toss them immediately,
This is almost never possible. The
Il Wednesday 14 November 2007 05:50:36 Willem Buitendyk ha scritto:
Will Postgresql ever implement an ignore on error feature when bulk
loading data? Currently it is my understanding that any record that
violates a unique constraint will cause the copy from command to halt
execution instead
38 matches
Mail list logo
