On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:40 AM, novnovice novnov...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Greg. I'd had a quick look at bucardo and while it seems capable of
doing the job (or helping to do that job), I was hoping there was something
simpler. But I will have a closer look.
Have you ever evaluated rubyrep
novnovice wrote:
My use case would involve a primary postgresql database and several
postgresql databases on disconnected notebook computers. All dbs need to be
able to support updates inserts etc; and then hopefully the replication
software would help with things like conflict resolution.
Thanks Greg. I'd had a quick look at bucardo and while it seems capable of
doing the job (or helping to do that job), I was hoping there was something
simpler. But I will have a closer look.
Have you ever evaluated rubyrep (http://www.rubyrep.org/)? It's also multi
master.
--
View this message
That's a surprising response. But it makes sense, at least as one
perspective. I have written light duty sync systems but figured that there
would be some battle tested postgresql solution that was more robust than I
could cobble together. As in, if I invest 40 hours learning replication
system
On 09/27/10 11:18 PM, novnovice wrote:
That's a surprising response. But it makes sense, at least as one
perspective. I have written light duty sync systems but figured that there
would be some battle tested postgresql solution that was more robust than I
could cobble together. As in, if I
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 20:08 -0700, novnovice wrote:
Can anyone recommend a relatively simple merge replication package that would
work well on windows and which relies on one of the current postgresql
versions? 9 would be fine for my needs. I'm a fairly unsophisticated
postgresql user; and not
novnovice == novnovice novnov...@gmail.com writes:
novnovice That's a surprising response. But it makes sense, at least as
novnovice one perspective. I have written light duty sync systems but
novnovice figured that there would be some battle tested postgresql
novnovice solution that was more
Joshua, you're with command prompt...you had/have a product called mammoth
replicator which I looked at. It seemed approx what I was after but the
project didn't seem very alive. Was my use case not what mammoth was about?
Or is it just that mammoth is basically gone?
--
View this message in
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 09:32 -0700, novnovice wrote:
Joshua, you're with command prompt...you had/have a product called mammoth
replicator which I looked at. It seemed approx what I was after but the
project didn't seem very alive. Was my use case not what mammoth was about?
Or is it just that
Can anyone recommend a relatively simple merge replication package that would
work well on windows and which relies on one of the current postgresql
versions? 9 would be fine for my needs. I'm a fairly unsophisticated
postgresql user; and not very experienced with replication on other
databases.
On 09/27/10 8:08 PM, novnovice wrote:
Can anyone recommend a relatively simple merge replication package that would
work well on windows and which relies on one of the current postgresql
versions? 9 would be fine for my needs. I'm a fairly unsophisticated
postgresql user; and not very
11 matches
Mail list logo
