Re: [HACKERS] returning modified input from C functions

2004-08-23 Thread strk
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 03:20:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is returning a pointer to the input safe in every case ? > > You mean for returning *unmodified* input, don't you? > > Yes, that's safe. Scribbling on input values is definitely never safe. > >

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

2004-08-23 Thread Greg Stark
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> According to the previous port report from Red Hat, the PS2 chip simply > >> doesn't have any user-space TAS instruction, so you're pretty much stuck. > > > Out of curiosity

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, the previous port report for 7.4 already required explicit > disabling: > needs new config.guess, --disable-spinlocks Yeah, because *normal* ARM processors have a TAS instruction, and configure only recognizes that you have an ARM. Ap

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

2004-08-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > > If that's not worth the trouble, would it be a good idea to have > > configure disable spinlocks automagically on unsupported platforms? > > It used to do that. We deliberately changed this in 8.0 so that > people would be aware that they were losing performance, and would be >

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

2004-08-23 Thread Gavin Sherry
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Greg Stark wrote: > > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've compiled 8.0 beta 1 on a R5900 V3.1 (a playstation 2) running > > > Linux (PS2 Linux 1) for portability testing. > > > ... > > > I'm wondering: would it be hard to fix

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> According to the previous port report from Red Hat, the PS2 chip simply >> doesn't have any user-space TAS instruction, so you're pretty much stuck. > Out of curiosity. If it lacks a tas instruction, is there really a

Re: [HACKERS] AT TIME ZONE

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > With the new timezone stuff, is there any reason this shouldn't be made > to work now in CVS: > test=# select current_timestamp at time zone 'Australia/Perth'; > ERROR: time zone "australia/perth" not recognized Lack of round tuits. We have

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: >> OK, what I mean is to know if a row is locked by any backend, why can't >> we just put a reference count of the number of locks on that row, >> instead of recording each backend separately? Wouldn't

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

2004-08-23 Thread Greg Stark
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I've compiled 8.0 beta 1 on a R5900 V3.1 (a playstation 2) running > > Linux (PS2 Linux 1) for portability testing. > > ... > > I'm wondering: would it be hard to fix the assembly spinlock code > > for the R5900? > > Ac

[HACKERS] AT TIME ZONE

2004-08-23 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
With the new timezone stuff, is there any reason this shouldn't be made to work now in CVS: test=# select current_timestamp at time zone 'Australia/Perth'; ERROR: time zone "australia/perth" not recognized Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans

2004-08-23 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Uh ... the interesting question is usually not "does this backend hold > > any row locks", it is "is this row locked by any backends". If the > > latter question is not *exceedingly* cheap to answer, at least in the > > normal case where th

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling

2004-08-23 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Uh ... the interesting question is usually not "does this backend hold any row locks", it is "is this row locked by any backends". If the latter question is not *exceedingly* cheap to answer, at least in the normal case where the answer is no, you don't have a workable solution, because you'll be

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling as

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ie. why can't we just record the number of locks each backend has, sort > of, and use a reference counting sort of method. Per-backend in case > the backend dies and we need to discount those locks..? Uh ... the interesting question is usual

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling

2004-08-23 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
pg_subtrans is trivial to index --- it's a linear array subscripted by TransactionId. I'm not sure what we'd do to handle row locks, which would need a key like (DBoid, RELoid, BlockNum, LineNum) and would be extremely non-dense in that space. 'Tis something to think about though... I've been thin

Re: [HACKERS] New warning in pg_dump

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 01:27 PM 24/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote: >> I prefer declaring it as unsigned, which means you drop the >> \377 end instead ... > ...I've used explicit values (128) since '\200' is -127. Actually I'd go with "(unsigned char) '\200'". There's a bunch of

Re: [HACKERS] auto-casting a bit more intelligent in 8.0 ... ?

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > so, its trying bigint = int, and not picking up the index ... > the database server is 7.4.3 ... is this something that has been made a > bit more intelligent in 8.0? other then casting 0 to bigint, is there > something else I should be looking a

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling as

2004-08-23 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:17:59AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Just random speculation, but could we use a pg_subtrans-like setup to do > row share locks? > > ie. Store them in a sort of table to avoid the problems with limited > shared memory size? Hmm ... how would you map the row

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling as

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just random speculation, but could we use a pg_subtrans-like setup to do > row share locks? pg_subtrans is trivial to index --- it's a linear array subscripted by TransactionId. I'm not sure what we'd do to handle row locks, which would need

Re: [HACKERS] New warning in pg_dump

2004-08-23 Thread Philip Warner
At 01:27 PM 24/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote: I prefer declaring it as unsigned, which means you drop the \377 end instead ... No problem. Philip Warner| __---_ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |/ - \

Re: [HACKERS] New warning in pg_dump

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 01:58 AM 24/08/2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> static int _isIdentChar(unsigned char c) > I think the correct thing to do is to leave it as (signed) char, and remove > the comparison to \200 = -127. No, that isn't the right thing, because not all pla

Re: [HACKERS] New warning in pg_dump

2004-08-23 Thread Philip Warner
At 01:27 PM 24/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote: I prefer declaring it as unsigned, which means you drop the \377 end instead ... ...I've used explicit values (128) since '\200' is -127. Philip Warner| __---_ Albatr

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've compiled 8.0 beta 1 on a R5900 V3.1 (a playstation 2) running > Linux (PS2 Linux 1) for portability testing. > ... > I'm wondering: would it be hard to fix the assembly spinlock code > for the R5900? According to the previous port report from Red Hat, the P

[HACKERS] auto-casting a bit more intelligent in 8.0 ... ?

2004-08-23 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Just had a "performance" question from a client ... the query they were running, through EXPLAIN ANALYZE, was showing 37ms to resolve ... there are indices on the two fields being queried, but only used on one of them ... by changing the query *very slightly* (adding ::bigint to force-cast one

Re: [HACKERS] New warning in pg_dump

2004-08-23 Thread Philip Warner
At 01:58 AM 24/08/2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote: static int _isIdentChar(unsigned char c) I think the correct thing to do is to leave it as (signed) char, and remove the comparison to \200 = -127. All chars will be >= -127. I will fix this in the next release. --

Re: [HACKERS] compile warnings in HEAD

2004-08-23 Thread Philip Warner
At 12:11 PM 24/08/2004, Neil Conway wrote: I get the following warnings compiling current sources: My fault; I'll fix it in the next patch to pg_dump etc. I compare a char to the range \200 through \377. It must always be >= \200...at least I assume that's the problem. --

[HACKERS] compile warnings in HEAD

2004-08-23 Thread Neil Conway
I get the following warnings compiling current sources: /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_db.c: In function `_isIdentChar': /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_db.c:874: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type /Users/neilc/pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling as

2004-08-23 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Just random speculation, but could we use a pg_subtrans-like setup to do row share locks? ie. Store them in a sort of table to avoid the problems with limited shared memory size? Chris Tom Lane wrote: Log Message: --- Rearrange pg_subtrans handling as per recent discussion. pg_subtrans

Re: [HACKERS] debuging postgres

2004-08-23 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
in order to debug "step by step" the postmaster, just to understand better the code, is it enough to compile it after having exported: CFLAGS='-O0 -g' ? do you have any hint and/or tips ? BTW what do you use for this task ? ./configure --enable-debug Chris ---(end of broadca

Re: [HACKERS] missing data/global

2004-08-23 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
If you're not missing your data dir, clog or xlog then what's the problem? Daniel Kalchev wrote: Hello, Is there ANY chance to recover data from a database system that suffered disk crash, and is not missing the data/global directory? Version is 7.2.4. Database files seem to be intact as well as

[HACKERS] 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

2004-08-23 Thread Chris
Hi, I've compiled 8.0 beta 1 on a R5900 V3.1 (a playstation 2) running Linux (PS2 Linux 1) for portability testing. Here is what make check gave: Without --disable-spinlocks compilation *appears* to be fine, but the backends core dumps on the spinlock assembly in s_lock.c (signal 4 -- illegal in

Re: [HACKERS] fsync and hardware write cache

2004-08-23 Thread Steve Atkins
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:19:20PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > >Does it make sense to add a platform specific call that will flush a write > >cache when fsync is enable? > > > Pete Zaitsev from mysql wrote that there is a special call on Mac OS: > Quoting him: > > >Mac OS X also has this "opti

Re: [HACKERS] PITR: XLog File compression on Archive

2004-08-23 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:05:33AM +0200, Gaetano Mendola wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > >As a result, I have thought that there may be a way to remove those pages > >from the xlog files immediately before being copied away to archive, > >without effecting crash recovery logic AT ALL. > > So th

Re: [HACKERS] PITR: XLog File compression on Archive

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As a result, I have thought that there may be a way to remove those pages > from the xlog files immediately before being copied away to archive, without > effecting crash recovery logic AT ALL. This isn't all that easy. The main problem I can see is tha

Re: [HACKERS] PITR: XLog File compression on Archive

2004-08-23 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Simon Riggs wrote: As a result, I have thought that there may be a way to remove those pages from the xlog files immediately before being copied away to archive, without effecting crash recovery logic AT ALL. The archiver process could read the xlog files and re-write them exactly as read to anothe

Re: [HACKERS] PITR: XLog File compression on Archive

2004-08-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:03:26PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > Simon, > > > I raise this now because I'm thinking that this functionality really ought > > to be in the main production 8.0 release. Not sure if anybody will > > agreebut that's what I'm thinking now, ba

Re: [HACKERS] PITR: XLog File compression on Archive

2004-08-23 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:03:26PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: Simon, > I raise this now because I'm thinking that this functionality really ought > to be in the main production 8.0 release. Not sure if anybody will > agreebut that's what I'm thinking now, based upon what seems like a > simple

Re: [HACKERS] Interactive docs

2004-08-23 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Gaetano Mendola wrote: > >>Hi all, >>I don't want be a pain in the but now that 7.4.5 is >>officially out I think is time to change the version doc on: >> >>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/interactive/index.html > I have updated the FAQ. ?? However I see now the right

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 Open Items

2004-08-23 Thread Simon Riggs
> Bruce Momjian wrote > >P O S T G R E S Q L > > 8 . 0 O P E NI T E M S > a few comments... > * add xid to log_line_prefix for PITR This at first sounded like a wonderfully simple solution, though on consideration, I'm not sure I'd r

[HACKERS] PITR: XLog File compression on Archive

2004-08-23 Thread Simon Riggs
One of the possible barriers to adoption of PITR is the volume of the logs themselves. Maybe this isn't a problem for now, maybe it is. Re-thinking the whole purpose of the additional full page images appended to the xlog records, I now understand and agree with Tom's comment in the docs that we

Re: [HACKERS] fsync and hardware write cache

2004-08-23 Thread Manfred Spraul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something to think about: if you run PostgreSQL with fsync on, but you use the hardware write cache on your disk drives, how likely are you to lose data? Obviously, this is a fairly limited problem, as it only applies to power down (which you can control) or power loss wher

Re: [HACKERS] missing data/global

2004-08-23 Thread Daniel Kalchev
Tom, This is basically what I had in mind, but you described it better than I ever could :) What I need from this database system is just one database and probably not all of the tables anyway (but some do seem valuable). This database happens to be second in the pg_dumpall script. The next da

Re: [HACKERS] returning modified input from C functions

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is returning a pointer to the input safe in every case ? You mean for returning *unmodified* input, don't you? Yes, that's safe. Scribbling on input values is definitely never safe. regards, tom lane ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] ALTER SCHEMA ... SET TABLESPACE

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> We avoided this with oids but it seems we have added another. I don't >>> see a good way of avoiding this like we had with oids. >> >> Isn't that what hte proposed (or implemented?) "SET DEFAULT_TABLESPACE" >> was for? > No

Re: [HACKERS] missing data/global

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Daniel Kalchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there ANY chance to recover data from a database system that suffered disk > crash, and is not missing the data/global directory? > Version is 7.2.4. Database files seem to be intact as well as pg_clog and > pg_xlog directories. The hard part I thin

Re: [HACKERS] fsync and hardware write cache

2004-08-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Something to think about: > > if you run PostgreSQL with fsync on, but you use the hardware write cache > on your disk drives, how likely are you to lose data? Obviously, this is a > fairly limited problem, as it only applies to power down (which you can > control) or po

Re: [HACKERS] fsync and hardware write cache

2004-08-23 Thread Doug McNaught
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Something to think about: > > if you run PostgreSQL with fsync on, but you use the hardware write cache > on your disk drives, how likely are you to lose data? Obviously, this is a > fairly limited problem, as it only applies to power down (which you can > control) or p

[HACKERS] fsync and hardware write cache

2004-08-23 Thread pgsql
Something to think about: if you run PostgreSQL with fsync on, but you use the hardware write cache on your disk drives, how likely are you to lose data? Obviously, this is a fairly limited problem, as it only applies to power down (which you can control) or power loss where the risks may be reduc

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 Open Items

2004-08-23 Thread Darcy Buskermolen
On August 20, 2004 09:01 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > > >>> * remove to_char(interval) if we initdb or mention removal > > >> > > >> I vote just to mention it's removal at this time, > > > > > > Agreed. Do

[HACKERS] returning modified input from C functions

2004-08-23 Thread strk
Is returning a pointer to the input safe in every case ? --strk; ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[HACKERS] debuging postgres

2004-08-23 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Hi all, in order to debug "step by step" the postmaster, just to understand better the code, is it enough to compile it after having exported: CFLAGS='-O0 -g' ? do you have any hint and/or tips ? BTW what do you use for this task ? Regards Gaetano Mendola ---(end of broadca

Re: [HACKERS] Interactive docs

2004-08-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have updated the FAQ. --- Gaetano Mendola wrote: > Hi all, > I don't want be a pain in the but now that 7.4.5 is > officially out I think is time to change the version doc on: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/in

[HACKERS] Interactive docs

2004-08-23 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Hi all, I don't want be a pain in the but now that 7.4.5 is officially out I think is time to change the version doc on: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/interactive/index.html Regards Gaetano Mendola ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can ge

[HACKERS] New warning in pg_dump

2004-08-23 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Hackers, I'm seeing this: gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I/home/alvherre/CVS/pgsql/source/00orig/src/interfaces/libpq -I../../../src/include -I/home/alvherre/CVS/pgsql/source/00orig/src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -DFRONTEND -c -o pg_backup_db.o

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] ALTER SCHEMA ... SET TABLESPACE

2004-08-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Philip Warner wrote: > >> At 03:15 PM 23/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote: > >> > >>> I thought the idea was for pg_dump to emit something like > >>> > >>> SET magic_tablespace_variable = some_ts; > >>> CREATE TABLE f

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] ALTER SCHEMA ... SET TABLESPACE

2004-08-23 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: Philip Warner wrote: At 03:15 PM 23/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote: I thought the idea was for pg_dump to emit something like SET magic_tablespace_variable = some_ts; CREATE TABLE foo (columns...); rather than CREATE TABLE foo (columns...)

Re: [HACKERS] monetary bug

2004-08-23 Thread Oliver Elphick
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 14:11, Mike Mascari wrote: ... > MONEY seems "odd" because it is interpreting its internal > representation based upon locale and the locale is also determining > its possible representation, so one database's MONEY isn't really > the same type as another database's MONEY.

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] ALTER SCHEMA ... SET TABLESPACE

2004-08-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So, if you do make the changes, will the schema definition be affected by > > those changes, or do you expect the tablespace to be embedded in the CREATE > > SCHEMA command? > > I thought the idea was for pg_dump to emit something l

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] ALTER SCHEMA ... SET TABLESPACE

2004-08-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On the question of schemas, how would you expect: > > SET magic_tablespace_variable = some_ts; > > CREATE SCHEMA foo; > > to behave? Would foo have a default tablespace of some_ts? > > Yeah, I would think so. I sur

Re: [HACKERS] monetary bug

2004-08-23 Thread Karel Zak
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 02:52:44PM +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Karel Zak wrote: > > > I think it's pretty extendable solution in contrast to the current > > hardcoded in/out datetypes functions. > > Who are we formatting for? If the client wants the data in a s

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] ALTER SCHEMA ... SET TABLESPACE

2004-08-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Philip Warner wrote: > At 03:15 PM 23/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote: > > >I thought the idea was for pg_dump to emit something like > > > > SET magic_tablespace_variable = some_ts; > > CREATE TABLE foo (columns...); > > > >rather than > > > > CREATE TABLE foo (columns...) TABLESP

Re: [HACKERS] monetary bug

2004-08-23 Thread Mike Mascari
Dennis Bjorklund wrote: On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote: To me, this seems completely wrong-headed. Data types should be defined by what operations you can do on them, not by what output format they have. I totally agree, lets get rid of money all together. If not, what makes money s

[HACKERS] missing data/global

2004-08-23 Thread Daniel Kalchev
Hello, Is there ANY chance to recover data from a database system that suffered disk crash, and is not missing the data/global directory? Version is 7.2.4. Database files seem to be intact as well as pg_clog and pg_xlog directories. Thanks in advance for any ideas. Daniel --

Re: [HACKERS] monetary bug

2004-08-23 Thread Dennis Bjorklund
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Karel Zak wrote: > I think it's pretty extendable solution in contrast to the current > hardcoded in/out datetypes functions. Who are we formatting for? If the client wants the data in a specific format then they can do SELECT to_char(...), or do the formatting in t

Re: [HACKERS] monetary bug

2004-08-23 Thread Karel Zak
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 04:07:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> We keep hoping someone will step up to the plate and rewrite it, > >> instead. Per previous discussion, the type really ought to be a thin > >> layer over "numeric", wit

Re: [HACKERS] Installing PostgreSQL in a Unix Platform

2004-08-23 Thread Eyinagho Newton
Dear Drake, Thanks for your response and suggestions on what i should do to solve the above problem. I have tried it and here are the results i had: doing a cd /usr from the command line took me into usr directory. However when i tried to do another cd /local from the above resulting command

Re: [HACKERS] 8.0 Open Items

2004-08-23 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:44:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > >>> * remove to_char(interval) if we initdb or mention removal > >> > >> I vote just to mention it's removal at this time, > > > Agreed. Done. > > While I don't c