On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:51:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I back-patched 7.4 as well, which is the oldest branch that has this
code. The Cygwin people still need to fix their bug, since it's
entirely possible to run the system out of FDs after we're up and
running ... but it's surely a waste
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:37:48AM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
Bruce Momjian schrieb:
I am curious why Cygwin needs DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib, and Win32
doesn't:
[snip]
The only difference I see is that Cygwin uses $(DLLINIT) while Win32
does not. Is that correct? Why?
Both set
Reini,
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:16:49PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
This time contrib is added to the cygwin package. It was not in 7.4.x.
Actually, contrib was included:
$ tar -tjf postgresql-7.4.5-1.tar.bz2 | fgrep contrib
usr/share/doc/postgresql-7.4.5/contrib/
Yurgis,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:18:06PM -0800, Yurgis Baykshtis wrote:
I tried to raise the question on pg-hackers forum and cygwin forum
(regarding readdir() misbehavior) but could not get any help so far :(
If you can produce a minimal test case that reproduces the problem, then
one of
Andrew,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:25:01AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
WinXP/cygwin/gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)
XP Home or Pro? What version of Cygwin?
gives these
tablecmds.c:3528: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
[snip]
FWIW, I saw
Andrew,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:56:51AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Jason Tishler wrote:
Are you getting hangs or connection refused errors. The Cygwin
PostgreSQL README documents the following issue:
[snip]
hangs - I have to kill the psql process to continue.
This could mean
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:57:16AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
Here: http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ are ports of several unix
utility programs (including bison and flex) for win32. From my
experiences compiling the Peer Direct port, this is the easiest way to
get started.
OK, I'll throw
Thomas,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:55:42PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:10:05AM -0500, Thomas Swan wrote:
On 8/8/2003 5:49 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
Is this just the --with-openssl option? Does it build cleanly
under Cygwin? If so, would you like me to include
Thomas,
[I would have responded sooner, but I have been on vacation.]
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:10:05AM -0500, Thomas Swan wrote:
On 8/8/2003 5:49 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
Is this just the --with-openssl option? Does it build cleanly
under Cygwin? If so, would you like me to include
Carlos,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:20:01AM +0200, Carlos Guzman Alvarez wrote:
I want to know if postgresql 7.4 beta 1 can be configured under
Cygwin with SSL support ??
If the answer is positive how can i do it ?? or where can i found
documentation about this ( under linux or cygwin :) )
Bruce,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:50:49PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, patch applied to typedef sa_family_t for cygwin. If other
platforms need it, I will have to do something more generic.
I'm happy to report that the above patch solves one of Cygwin's current
build problems. However,
Bruce,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:04:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
All that probably needed to change for cygwin was to no longer
use sa_family_t in the getaddrinfo.c.
But Jason reported he needed that typedef for sa_family_t. Jason, is
that accurate.
Yes.
If
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 04:54:21PM +0100, deststar wrote:
On cygwin sa_family_t was undeclared, adding the following line:
typedef unsigned short sa_family_t;
to both:
src/port/getaddrinfo.c
src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h
Isn't the attached or fixing Cygwin itself a better approach?
seemed to
Richard,
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 02:27:22PM -0800, Richard Pais wrote:
Just an explanation in the FAQ that the ipc-daemon is not running
won't suffice. Because in my case I had ipc-daemon (version 1.11)
running and it still hung (Jason's patch reported the IpcMemoryCreate
error). Only when
Bruce,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:42:30AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
To get into the FAQ, it should be something that happens _frequently_,
hence FAQ.
Understood. That is why is said for consideration.
Fact is, cygwin may not even be needed in 7.4 because we are
working on a native port.
Tom,
Peter,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 03:05:25PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:43:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
If you can detect that cygipc is not running, then ENOSYS seems the
best choice for reporting that. (ENOSPC would be misleading too.)
Thanks for your
This post is just for closure -- both of the issues below have been
resolved:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:47:35AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e.,
1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y
successfully. I will post
Tom,
Peter,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:43:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To me, this is a bug in PostgreSQL.
I disagree: just because cygipc returns error codes chosen at random
doesn't mean that we should neglect the clear meaning of an error
code.
Peter,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:36:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Dave Page writes:
Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the
binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to
be listed as supported if no-one disagrees...
I disagree. We
Matthew,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:50:40PM -0500, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Are you compiling from CVS or from a released tarball?
CVS.
The bison requirement was recently raised to bison 1.5 or above (1.75
was recently released also.) This is an issue only when compiling
from CVS, since
Dave,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:00:20PM -, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net]
Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58
Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the
binary distribution that Jason builds, I would
Dave,
Thanks for the heads up...
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:31:00AM -, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Folks. start sending in those
Dave,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net]
Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Please try with Cygwin 1.3.14-1 while I attempt to deal
Dave,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote:
Ok, but this is going to take a while as few of the mirrors seem to
have this release yet. I also need to download a new set of everything
for reasons I won't go
Michael,
Please post instead of sending private email.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:08:02PM +0200, Michael Steiner wrote:
FAQ says: A native port to MS Win NT/2000/XP is currently being worked
on.
= When is it expected to be available as a stable release?
I don't know.
Will it be based on
Peter,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
Seems to build cleanly here now.
And here (and now) too.
Perhaps anoncvs just hadn't sync'd up when you tried Jason?
I guess so -- very strange...
Anyway, sorry (again) for the noise and thanks for fixing the Cygwin
build.
Dave,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:54:50PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
I get the following error when building beta 1 on CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9
1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i686 unknown:
make[3]: Entering directory
Peter,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:33:20PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Dave Page writes:
I get the following error when building beta 1 on CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9
1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i686 unknown:
Should all be fixed now.
Huh? I don't see any recent CVS commits to indicate
Peter,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 02:51:31PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jason Tishler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:33:20PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Should all be fixed now.
Huh? I don't see any recent CVS commits to indicate this.
I see as a commit:
[snip]
I assume
Bruce,
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 08:49:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
mlw wrote:
Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll write it
for Windows.
That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Windows would be kind of
cool to have.
I am wondering why we
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:33:57PM -0400, mlw wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
mlw wrote:
Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll write
it for Windows.
That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Windows would be kind of
cool to have.
I am
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:36:51AM -0400, mlw wrote:
Jason Tishler wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:33:57PM -0400, mlw wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
mlw wrote:
Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll
write it for Windows.
That being said
mlw,
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:25:02PM -0400, mlw wrote:
A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin
dll. I know and understand there is some disagreement with this position,
but in this I'm sure about this.
Sorry, but I'm not going to touch the above -- even with a
Joel,
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Joel Burton wrote:
Sorry, but since I install all Cygwin packages plus about 30
additional ones I haven't desire to determine what are the
minimal requirements.
If no one else has done this, I'll be happy to dig in and answer this.
34 matches
Mail list logo
