Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I don't know what unreasonable infrastructure you are referring to.
Building cvsup is a major pain, but installing and running it isn't, in
my experience. There's a package in Fedora Extras. Setting up cvsweb
against my cvsup repo is a fine idea
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I don't know what unreasonable infrastructure you are referring to.
> Building cvsup is a major pain, but installing and running it isn't, in
> my experience. There's a package in Fedora Extras. Setting up cvsweb
> against my cvsup repo is a fine idea - I wonder why I did
Does anyone here know how to use the latest version of Bittorrent, from a
server vs client, perspective? The one we are currently running is
*ancient*, and I'd like to get that vServer upgraded and off the
templates, but without someone that knows how to setup the newer
bittorrent, well, tha
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the
> cvs repo?
> >
> > That'd be Marc's bailiwick not mine ... but rsync from the anoncvs
> > mirror seems like it couldn't pose any serious security threat.
> > Marc?
>
> I can't think
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tom Lane said:
Why in the world is cvsup linked to X libraries? Surely it does not
need a GUI.
The client has GUI and non-GUI modes. For command-line ops use the -g flag
or unset DISPLAY.
Apparently n
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
$ ldd bin/cvsup
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7f5b000)
libXaw.so.7 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw.so.7 (0xb7eff000)
libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tom Lane said:
Why in the world is cvsup linked to X libraries? Surely it does not
need a GUI.
The client has GUI and non-GUI modes. For command-line ops use the -g flag
or unset DISPLAY.
Apparently not only the CVSup authors chose a weird langua
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tom Lane said:
>
> > Why in the world is cvsup linked to X libraries? Surely it does not
> > need a GUI.
>
> The client has GUI and non-GUI modes. For command-line ops use the -g flag
> or unset DISPLAY.
Apparently not only the CVSup authors chose a weird language, they
Tom Lane said:
> Why in the world is cvsup linked to X libraries? Surely it does not
> need a GUI.
>
The client has GUI and non-GUI modes. For command-line ops use the -g flag
or unset DISPLAY.
My crontab entry looks like this:
3 * * * * /usr/bin/cvsup -g -r 25 /home/cvsmirror/postgres.cvsup
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ ldd bin/cvsup
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
> libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7f5b000)
> libXaw.so.7 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw.so.7 (0xb7eff000)
> libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0xb7ee9000)
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I agree that investigating alternatives would be a good idea: AFAIK
> > there's no easy way to build cvsup on Linux/AMD64 (without patches and
> > more pain than I'm willing to endure), so I use cvsup on one machine and
> > then periodic
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Joel Miller wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
The only reason I can possibly think of is server load, comparing the
timestamps for every file and directory in a repository for ever
Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just to be clear. The comma was a mistype. I was stating that you do not
want to use a period. If you use a period and you are not in the correct
directory, rsync will remove everything within your working directory.
Oh, so you're
I figure that Joshua just hit the wrong key ... or, at least, I hope
that is what he did, vs just going blind at a young age ;(
No, not that blind yet :)
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to be clear. The comma was a mistype. I was stating that you do not
> want to use a period. If you use a period and you are not in the correct
> directory, rsync will remove everything within your working directory.
Oh, so you're saying the s
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
/usr/local/bin/rsync -avzCH --delete anoncvs.postgresql.org::pgsql-cvs .
its actually a "." ... what would a ',' do? :)
egad... heh... it would create a directory called "," ;) So y
Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
/usr/local/bin/rsync -avzCH --delete anoncvs.postgresql.org::pgsql-cvs .
its actually a "." ... what would a ',' do? :)
egad... heh... it would create a directory called "," ;) So you probably
don't want
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> /usr/local/bin/rsync -avzCH --delete anoncvs.postgresql.org::pgsql-cvs .
>> its actually a "." ... what would a ',' do? :)
> egad... heh... it would create a directory called "," ;) So you probably
> don't want either.
U
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
That'd be Marc's bailiwick not mine ... but r
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
That'd be Marc's bailiwick not mine ... but rsync from the anoncvs
mir
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
That'd be Marc's bailiwick not mine ... but rsync from the anoncvs
mirror seems like it couldn't pose any serious se
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Joel Miller wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
The only reason I can possibly think of is server load, comparing the
timestamps for every file and directory in a repository for every rsync
session could be
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
That'd be Marc's bailiwick not mine ... but rsync from the anoncvs
mirror seems like it couldn't pose any serious security threat.
Marc?
I
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
The only reason I can possibly think of is server load, comparing the
timestamps for every file and directory in a repository for every rsync session
could be taxing if everyone under the sun and all
Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
That'd be Marc's bailiwick not mine ... but rsync from the anoncvs
mirror seems like it couldn't pose any serious security threat.
Marc?
Well it would sure seem
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the cvs repo?
That'd be Marc's bailiwick not mine ... but rsync from the anoncvs
mirror seems like it couldn't pose any serious security threat.
Marc?
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I agree that investigating alternatives would be a good idea: AFAIK
there's no easy way to build cvsup on Linux/AMD64 (without patches and
more pain than I'm willing to endure), so I use cvsup on one machine and
then periodically rsync a c
This whole discussion reminds me why we've stuck so fervently to
bog-standard ANSI C for Postgres. There is a payoff for taking
portability seriously. Too bad the original authors of cvsup were more
interested in using a flavor-of-the-month programming language...
Is there any reason why we
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree that investigating alternatives would be a good idea: AFAIK
> there's no easy way to build cvsup on Linux/AMD64 (without patches and
> more pain than I'm willing to endure), so I use cvsup on one machine and
> then periodically rsync a copy of that
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Personally, I'd really like to have a local repository copy, because
> I spend a *lot* of time with cvsweb etc --- but I'm sure my needs are
> several standard deviations away from the mean.
I'm actually amazed that anyone does any serious amoun
[I thought this had gone out to the list when I first sent it, but now I
see that it didn't]
Actually, I've already looked at it very closely (spent a whole day
browsing the latest source code, in fact). The problem is csup still
doesn't support mirroring of the repository ",v" files. It only acts
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:32:34PM -0800, Joel Miller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to get a local mirror of the cvs repository, but my
> connection attempts using rsync to cvsup.postgresql.org are always
> refused when I try to actually retrieve the pgsql-cvs collection. I tried
> to use r
Yes, that's one way to solve the problem. I was just trying to suggest
something that would benefit everyone in general while not opening up a
can of worms with regard to increased server load in the long term.
Joel
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 4:34 PM, Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>On Thu
Plain old cvs doesn't work for me because I need to get the repository,
not just a checkout of the sources, so I can do diffs, browse old
versions and what-not. I find that it's easier to understand code that's
been around for a while if I can observe how it's changed over time.
Usually, when I ha
It's only partially compatible: Like I mentioned earlier, csup currently
only acts as an alternative cvs checkout client.
Joel
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 3:15 PM, Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Is csup protocol-compatible with cvsup? If so people could use it
>without Marc having to do anyt
Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
Any particular reason why straight CVS doesn't work for you? Are you
that interested in having the log comment locally?
Personally, I'd really like to have a local repository copy, because
I spend a *lot* of time with cvsweb etc --- but
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> Any particular reason why straight CVS doesn't work for you? Are you
> that interested in having the log comment locally?
Personally, I'd really like to have a local repository copy, because
I spend a *lot* of time with cvsweb etc --- but I'm sure my needs are
sev
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:32:34PM -0800, Joel Miller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to get a local mirror of the cvs repository, but my
> connection attempts using rsync to cvsup.postgresql.org are always
> refused when I try to actually retrieve the pgsql-cvs collection. I tried
> to use r
Joel Miller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to get a local mirror of the cvs repository, but my
> connection attempts using rsync to cvsup.postgresql.org are always
> refused when I try to actually retrieve the pgsql-cvs collection. I
> tried to use rsync because cvsup is simply not an option
Hello,
I've been trying to get a local mirror of the cvs repository, but my
connection attempts using rsync to cvsup.postgresql.org are always
refused when I try to actually retrieve the pgsql-cvs collection. I tried
to use rsync because cvsup is simply not an option for me.
I'd like to suggest t
40 matches
Mail list logo
