PostgreSQL runs beautifully together with JBoss (or any other J2EE platform)
using its current JDBC driver so the idea of a co-bundle is not far fetched
at all.
I'm not an advocate for a backend rewrite to Java. I'm however a firm
believer that Java and the J2EE platform will become (if it isn't a
Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
That was uncalled for.
Statements like this do not make the Postgres
community any healthier.
You don't have any benefit of pushing back Java users.
On the other hand, can you imagine the reaction of the Java camp to an
idea like "why not rewrite JBoss in Tcl and PL/Tcl so th
That was uncalled for.
Statements like this do not make the Postgres
community any healthier.
You don't have any benefit of pushing back Java users.
Ivelin
--- Jean-Michel POURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Mardi 09 Décembre 2003 16:15, Ivelin Ivanov a
> écrit :
> > I think that a co-bundle
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
Le Mardi 09 Décembre 2003 16:15, Ivelin Ivanov a écrit :
I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
container like JBoss and a scalable database like
PostgreSQL will be a blast.
Why not cut all trees on earth and replace them with plastic? Before that, we
Jean-Michel POURE said:
> Le Mardi 09 Décembre 2003 16:15, Ivelin Ivanov a écrit :
>> I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
>> container like JBoss and a scalable database like
>> PostgreSQL will be a blast.
>
> Why not cut all trees on earth and replace them with plastic? Before
> t
Le Mardi 09 Décembre 2003 16:15, Ivelin Ivanov a écrit :
> I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
> container like JBoss and a scalable database like
> PostgreSQL will be a blast.
Why not cut all trees on earth and replace them with plastic? Before that, we
need to port mankind DNA
ithankar
Cc: Postgresql Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL port to pure Java?
Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jokes and facts aside, I can't help it to think how better it would
> have been, if postgresql was in C++. We could easily plug multiple
&
Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jokes and facts aside, I can't help it to think how better it would
> have been, if postgresql was in C++. We could easily plug multiple
> implementations of underlying subsystems without mucking much in base
> code..
That's easy to do in any lang
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Not to mention it would kill PostgreSQL's current speedy performance!
Maybe, maybe not. Modern JVMs have much better performance
characteristics than was once the case. Also, some of the things that
Java buys you (memory management, threading, for example) might actually
Robert Treat wrote:
> Someone did it but it didn't catch fire.
I think what will catch fire in a big way is plphp. Managers will like
an all php platform that is extremely capable and productive.
Developers will enjoy php's natural syntax and agnostic approach to
programming. PHP5, when it becom
That is the current status, but this is a very active project and I
believe the cvs version is much better.
You are correct though it is an embedded db, and as such is quite cool.
The reason I suggested it was more of an academic exercise for folks who
wanted to see the issues with doing this in
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 12:32, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> PL/Java would be way cool, though, and have
> very significant appeal, and is very much worth doing, I believe. (Not
> that I have the time to do it.)
>
http://pljava.sourceforge.net/
Someone did it but it didn't catch fire.
Robert Treat
--
Andrew Dunstan kirjutas T, 09.12.2003 kell 22:07:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> >Have a look at Axion for a pure java db
> >
> >http://axion.tigris.org/
> >
> >Not as full featured,but still useful.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Er, I take it that "not as full featured" is an example of meiosis :-)
>
> Here's wh
We remain sceptical about writing an RDBMS in Java. The earlier
version of TelegraphCQ was in Java and turned out to be a bit of a
pain.
Some more information:
Mehul A. Shah, Samuel Madden, Michael J. Franklin, Joseph
M. Hellerstein: Java Support for Data-Intensive Systems: Experiences
Building
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ivelin Ivanov) writes:
> Has this subject been discussed before?
> I did not find any references to it in the archives.
>
> I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
> container like JBoss and a scalable database like
> PostgreSQL will be a blast.
>
> There are several
Dave Cramer wrote:
Have a look at Axion for a pure java db
http://axion.tigris.org/
Not as full featured,but still useful.
Er, I take it that "not as full featured" is an example of meiosis :-)
Here's what the web page says:
Not (Yet) Supporte
Hello,
All due respect but this seems like a completely insane idea.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
Has this subject been discussed before?
I did not find any references to it in the archives.
I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
container like JBoss and a scalab
Have a look at Axion for a pure java db
http://axion.tigris.org/
Not as full featured,but still useful.
Dave
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 13:32, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>
> >On December 9, 2003 12:15 pm, Neil Conway wrote:
> >
> >
> >>P.S. While we're contemplating pies-in-t
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On December 9, 2003 12:15 pm, Neil Conway wrote:
P.S. While we're contemplating pies-in-the-sky, I'd personally love to
rewrite PostgreSQL in Objective Caml.
I vote for InterCal. :-)
Pick your poison from this site: http://99-bottles-of-beer.ls-la.net/
(see es
Neil Conway wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As a Java programmer, I do agree that having a pure Java RDBMS
system would be a Good Thing (tm)
Are there any advantages that this would provide that we could get
without investing so much effort? For example, PL/Java seems lik
On December 9, 2003 12:15 pm, Neil Conway wrote:
> P.S. While we're contemplating pies-in-the-sky, I'd personally love to
> rewrite PostgreSQL in Objective Caml.
I vote for InterCal. :-)
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frank Wiles wrote:
>> Not to mention it would kill PostgreSQL's current speedy
>> performance!
> Maybe, maybe not. Modern JVMs have much better performance
> characteristics than was once the case. Also, some of the things
> that Java buys you (memory m
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 07:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Ivelin Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has this subject been discussed before?
I did not find any references to it in the archives.
I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
container like JBoss and a scalable database like
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL port to pure Java?
Has this subject been discussed before?
I did not find any references to it in the archives.
I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
container like JBoss and a scalable database like
PostgreSQL will be a blast
Ivelin Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has this subject been discussed before?
> I did not find any references to it in the archives.
I think the phrase "not gonna happen" was invented for this subject. :)
-Doug
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 07:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Ivelin Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has this subject been discussed before?
> I did not find any references to it in the archives.
>
> I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
> container like JBoss and a scalable database like
> Postg
Has this subject been discussed before?
I did not find any references to it in the archives.
I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
container like JBoss and a scalable database like
PostgreSQL will be a blast.
There are several well performing comercial Java dbs
out there and there
27 matches
Mail list logo
