Probably from the use of critical (mutex), the way #subscriptionsHandling: is
done, and that Announcer is built for X number of announcers and Y number of
subscribers, which means that each announcement the announcer has to filter and
find the correct subscribers.
| ann a |
ann :=
Hi all,
Doru, Stephan, Norbert, Denis and me spoke at ESUG about the non-use of
Announcer in Bloc.
I made some test cases in Bloc-Tests to compare performances between
Announcer and BlEventRegistry.
The result is that Announcer is at least 5x slower in all tested cases.
Bloc has only specific
I wrote an issue here:
https://github.com/npasserini/iceberg/issues/124
There are several PRs apparently than you can push Nicolas I guess:
https://github.com/npasserini/iceberg/pulls
Thank you for the good job.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Nicolas Passerini
wrote:
> On 28 Aug 2016, at 15:38, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> Peter, The plan seems to be [1] to make the OpenSmalltalkVM a submodule under
> the pharo-vm.
>
> Esteban, Is this still the current plan, and when will this be done? I can't
> see an osvm folder at [2] yet. Are the
Peter, The plan seems to be [1] to make the OpenSmalltalkVM a submodule
under the pharo-vm.
Esteban, Is this still the current plan, and when will this be done? I
can't see an osvm folder at [2] yet. Are the build instructions there
still valid? Is there anything I can do to help?
cheers -ben
> what are the points you are working on and that would deserve more focus and
> help from the community?
I once started with a refactored version of GetText, covered with tests and
tools.
Code status I reached so far is here:
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~TorstenBergmann/Gettext
Idea
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:24:32AM -0300, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
> Just checked and the download URL is working.
> If you send me mirror URLs then I can update the configuration to support
> multiple download locations.
The University's whole website was down when I was trying to access it,
> Why you say so? It is maintained, and still the official pharo
distribution.
Because of this:
which coincided with the announcement of OpenSmalltalkVM... that's why I
wasn't sure what is the mainline. (Or maybe you took a vacation, which is
also an explanation :)... which reminds me that I
By the way first thing I would do is to remove FT2 plugin and see how it works
> On 28 Aug 2016, at 14:38, Peter Uhnak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to start looking into VMs a bit (because crashing several times a
> day for months now is really pushing my temper), but now I
Hi,
> On 28 Aug 2016, at 14:38, Peter Uhnak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to start looking into VMs a bit (because crashing several times a
> day for months now is really pushing my temper), but now I am not sure what
> is actually the VM.
>
> This is what it used to be
Hi,
I wanted to start looking into VMs a bit (because crashing several times a day
for months now is really pushing my temper), but now I am not sure what is
actually the VM.
This is what it used to be https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm, but it's
maintained anymore.
So there's this
See RBParserTest>>#testBinarySelectors
It's based on the draft ANSI Smalltalk-80 standard. You integrated it. It tests
the RBParser's parsing of binary method definitions and message sends of all
binary selectors from 1 char upto 3 chars. (The Blue Book is more restrictive
than ANSI, limiting
Hi,
The answer was that Spotter is not different in any way than any other global
shortcut. This means that if we want to have an interactive solution, we should
do it at the level of the Keymapping framework not at the level of individual
tools.
In the meantime, how do we manage this?
Other questions, where are the layout you have showed me at ESUG?
Is there a tree layout? If no, then I can port the one of Roassal.
Alexandre
> On Aug 28, 2016, at 5:18 AM, Aliaksei Syrel wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the example. Exactly, ability to have elements that
Thanks Alex!
Cheers,
Alexandre
> On Aug 28, 2016, at 5:18 AM, Aliaksei Syrel wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the example. Exactly, ability to have elements that are visible
> but not participate in layout is very important. But first I would like to
> describe bloc
Hi
Thanks for the example. Exactly, ability to have elements that are visible
but not participate in layout is very important. But first I would like to
describe bloc layout a bit more.
-
If you think for a second about the meaning of "layout" you would realize
> On 28 Aug 2016, at 00:55, Cyril Ferlicot D. wrote:
>
> Le 27/08/2016 à 14:32, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
>> yes, some years ago I made a package for this.
>> later Ben tried something similar with the user manager.
>> none of those approaches worked as general
Hi dale
Le 8/8/16 à 15:00, Dale Henrichs a écrit :
Max,
Thanks for looking into this.
Do you think that this bug will be fixed in Pharo5.0? When I'm
debugging the tests with this fatal pattern, my only recourse is to
start and stop images between test runs ...
Definitively. We do
Thank you all for taking care and feeling like Pharo is your baby :).
Stef
Le 8/8/16 à 09:11, Max Leske a écrit :
Thanks Nicolai.
I’ve opened an issue on phogbugz:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18885/Ensure-blocks-in-test-tear-down-not-always-executed.
On 8 Aug 2016, at 09:03,
Hi,
> On Aug 26, 2016, at 10:01 PM, Nicolai Hess wrote:
>
>
>
> 2016-08-26 0:51 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba :
> Hi,
>
> I just tried again, and the latest GToolkit image does contain FileSystem
> class >> gtExampleZip:
>
> Yes, it is there, but not
Hi Nicolai,
> On Aug 26, 2016, at 10:08 PM, Nicolai Hess wrote:
[…]
> > And the menu entries are ... unfortunate (see screenshot), what you put in,
> > the whole source as menu label?
>
> Hmm. Something is strange there. I get the name of a method, not the source
>
Hi,
I think this is a great idea.
Thanks for opening the issues. Now, the only question is where to put these.
You suggest the package Manifest. I think this would work for individual
packages, but as we are moving to projects (with Metacello), I would suggest to
put these methods in the
Thanks Cyril
Now we have to check what is synectique specific from what should be
pushed to Pharo.
Since we moved to a Seaside application not so long after I joined
Synectique we only disable some basic things.
If I don't say anything wrong here is what we did:
- Remove repositories
23 matches
Mail list logo