Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread stepharo
So the #! URL syntax was especially geared for sites that got the fundamental web development best practices horribly wrong, and gave them a lifeline to getting their content seen by Googlebot. And today, this emergency rescue package seems to be regarded as the One True Way of web

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread stepharo
sadly enough... Le 19/10/15 16:27, Levente Uzonyi a écrit : This is because for some unknown reason the creators of Smalltalkhub decided to use hashbang urls at a time when it was already considered bad practice to do so[1]. Crawlers can't crawl such pages, unless there are non-hashbang

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Git is a DISTRIBUTED source code management system, it does not really live on one server. Technically, your and everybody else's local copy contains everything. You can move it around at will. The github functionality on top of that *is* restricted to their site, although there are pretty

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread Alexandre Bergel
I agree with you. Github should definitely not be the unique place for code. But we should be able to have code there at a low cost. Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > On

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread monty
, 2015 at 11:19 AM From: "Alexandre Bergel" <alexandre.ber...@me.com> To: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed? On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:09 PM, monty <mon...@programmer.net> wrote:  Smalltalk

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread monty
efficient than boring old page numbers. > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 3:26 AM > From: stepharo <steph...@free.fr> > To: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed? > > > &

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread Serge Stinckwich
2015 at 11:19 AM > From: "Alexandre Bergel" <alexandre.ber...@me.com> > To: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed? > > On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:09 PM, monty <mon...@programmer.net&

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread monty
+1 > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 11:46 AM > From: "Serge Stinckwich" <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> > To: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed? > > I guess that A

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread Andreas Wacknitz
Am 22.10.15 um 17:30 schrieb monty: Github is a private VC funded company that we don't own that tomorrow could go away or adopt policies harmful to us. If Ruby can have rubygems.org (and if Steph can continue to get funding from INRIA/ESUG), then why can't we have something like STHub that's

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-22 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
You're right. In the 80's I was learning to write... However, there weren't public hosted repositories, and if there was; I bet they didn't have 2 million of them, nor even two orders of magnitude less. Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2015-10-22 13:28 GMT-03:00 Nicolas Cellier

[Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-19 Thread Jan Kurš
Hi, I noticed that my projects on Smalltalkhub cannot be googled :( I have project set up as a public, I actively develop and update the overview page for several months, but even the query: smalltalkhub does not find anything. Is there a way to help this? Cheers, Jan

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?

2015-10-19 Thread Levente Uzonyi
This is because for some unknown reason the creators of Smalltalkhub decided to use hashbang urls at a time when it was already considered bad practice to do so[1]. Crawlers can't crawl such pages, unless there are non-hashbang versions provided as well[2], but I strongly doubt Smalltalkhub