Does anybody else have issues while stepping through GLORP Proxy objects
(collections in this case)?
I simply can't use this feature unless the proxied collection was already
materialized.
I can't reproduce it right now, but it bites me everytime is step through
blocks, because stepping into is r
Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet? Unless
InstructionStream and ContextPart have been updated to use objectClass: and
objectInstVarAt: et al then the debugger will be fooled by proxies. I
really need to push this code through to Squeak trunk. Once I've done that
(Monday? it'
On 29 Nov 2013, at 22:03, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet?
No. I think the methods are not even in the image.
> Unless InstructionStream and ContextPart have been updated to use
> objectClass: and objectInstVarAt: et al then the debugger will be f
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> On 29 Nov 2013, at 22:03, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
> > Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet?
>
> No. I think the methods are not even in the image.
>
> > Unless InstructionStream and ContextPart have been updated to use
> o
On 29 November 2013 21:02, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet? Unless
> InstructionStream and ContextPart have been updated to use objectClass: and
> objectInstVarAt: et al then the debugger will be fooled by proxies. I
> really need to push this code th
2013/11/29 Eliot Miranda :
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Marcus Denker
> wrote:
>> On 29 Nov 2013, at 22:03, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>> > Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet?
>> No. I think the methods are not even in the image.
> I'll either prepare a change set or submit.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo
wrote:
> 2013/11/29 Eliot Miranda :
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Marcus Denker
> > wrote:
> >> On 29 Nov 2013, at 22:03, Eliot Miranda
> wrote:
> >> > Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet?
> >> No. I think the methods
Hello,
2013/11/30 Eliot Miranda
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <
> emaring...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2013/11/29 Eliot Miranda :
>> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Marcus Denker
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 29 Nov 2013, at 22:03, Eliot Miranda
>> wrote:
>> >> > Does th
Hi eliot
why in pharo 2.0?
Do you have some specific scenario? Because it would be better to have it in
Pharo 30 alpha.
Stef
On Nov 30, 2013, at 10:30 PM, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo
> wrote:
> 2013/11/29 Eliot Miranda :
> > On Fri,
2013/12/1 Stéphane Ducasse :
> Hi eliot
>
> why in pharo 2.0?
> Do you have some specific scenario? Because it would be better to have it in
> Pharo 30 alpha.
In ten days I'll put a system into production (cross your fingers). It
is built with Pharo 2 (what else?).
So having this... will certainly
On Dec 1, 2013, at 6:11 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
> 2013/12/1 Stéphane Ducasse :
>> Hi eliot
>>
>> why in pharo 2.0?
>> Do you have some specific scenario? Because it would be better to have it in
>> Pharo 30 alpha.
>
> In ten days I'll put a system into production (cross your fingers).
One thing with Pharo 3.0 is that the debugger is quite different than it
used to be.
It is now split into a model (DebugSession + DebugContext) and the view,
SpecDebugger. I don't know what Eliot does have to change but the new code
may require some extra work due to the debugger being different.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 01:02:53PM -0800, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet? Unless
> InstructionStream and ContextPart have been updated to use objectClass: and
> objectInstVarAt: et al then the debugger will be fooled by proxies. I
> really need to pus
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Clément Bera wrote:
> One thing with Pharo 3.0 is that the debugger is quite different than it
> used to be.
>
> It is now split into a model (DebugSession + DebugContext) and the view,
> SpecDebugger. I don't know what Eliot does have to change but the new code
>
Ok then the latest Pharo 3 that you can find here:
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-4-Publish/
is the best image for this fix.
However being the bleeding edge this image is stable but might have some
issues.
2013/12/2 Eliot Miranda
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:44 AM, C
Hi Eliot,
2013-11-30 18:30 GMT-03:00 Eliot Miranda :
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo
> wrote:
>> 2013/11/29 Eliot Miranda :
>> > I'll either prepare a change set or submit. It'll get done.
>> I can continue stepping into until the change is ready.
>> Please make it co
Hi Esteban,
find attached. Let me know of any problems.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo
wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
>
>
> 2013-11-30 18:30 GMT-03:00 Eliot Miranda :
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <
> emaring...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> 2013/11/29 E
Eliot,
I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because
there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset
changes classVars of ContextPart.
Your proposal:
classVariableNames: 'MaxLengthForASingleDebugLogReport
MaxStackDepthForASingleDebugLogReport PrimitiveFa
Hi Esteban,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
> Eliot,
>
> I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because
> there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset
> changes classVars of ContextPart.
>
> Your proposal:
> classVariable
2014-06-23 16:28 GMT-03:00 Eliot Miranda :
> Hi Esteban,
>> I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because
>> there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset
>> changes classVars of ContextPart.
>> Would you mind adapting your mirror methods changes to wo
On 23 Jun 2014, at 16:49, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
> 2014-06-23 16:28 GMT-03:00 Eliot Miranda :
>> Hi Esteban,
>
>>> I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because
>>> there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset
>>> changes classVars of ContextPa
2014-06-23 16:59 GMT-03:00 Esteban Lorenzano :
> sad, but understandable.
> in any case, it is a work for the pharo *community*, not for the consortium.
> things that would help:
> - an entry in the issue tracker
> - an explanation of the use case needed to solve
> - a pointer to Eliot modification
What specific problem are you having debugging? Stepping Through a
block which about to send message to a Proxy? It seems like I should
be having the same problem with Magma proxies.. I know sometimes I
would get a "Simulation" error while stepping Through (which would
blow up a debugging sessio
Hi Chris,
On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Chris Muller wrote:
> What specific problem are you having debugging? Stepping Through a
> block which about to send message to a Proxy? It seems like I should
> be having the same problem with Magma proxies.. I know sometimes I
> would get a "Simulation
On 24/6/14 08:18, stepharo wrote:
Esteban
I would like to know how different are the Glorp proxies from the ones
of Mariano.
Because we are thinking about to get by default a nice proxy system.
Proxies in the sense of object representing one that is not in the
system (and not proxies
as meta
Esteban
I would like to know how different are the Glorp proxies from the ones
of Mariano.
Because we are thinking about to get by default a nice proxy system.
Proxies in the sense of object representing one that is not in the
system (and not proxies
as metaobject or representing an object tha
Hi Stef,
2014-06-24 3:18 GMT-03:00 stepharo :
> Esteban
>
> I would like to know how different are the Glorp proxies from the ones of
> Mariano.
> Because we are thinking about to get by default a nice proxy system.
> Proxies in the sense of object representing one that is not in the system
> (and
On 24 Jun 2014, at 09:58, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> 2014-06-24 3:18 GMT-03:00 stepharo :
>> Esteban
>>
>> I would like to know how different are the Glorp proxies from the ones of
>> Mariano.
>> Because we are thinking about to get by default a nice proxy system.
>> Proxies in
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
> Eliot,
>
> I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because
> there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset
> changes classVars of ContextPart.
>
> Your proposal:
> classVariableNames: 'MaxLe
29 matches
Mail list logo
