Hi Offray
Ad hominem comments never help. But we all make mistakes, we are not
experts in Argumentation Theory, but I think we are learning from every
discussion.
Licensing has black void holes. I would prefer to read "GPL could result in
lower feedback for your projects, because community size i
>
> *From:* Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Dimitris Chloupis
> *Sent:* 08 September 2016 13:18
> *To:* Any question about pharo is welcome
> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Territorial Re-Licensing
>
>
>
> well he did apologize
>
>
>
>
Dory, can your mail be put on the Pharo web page, the contributions part? It
seems that with a bit of polishing it would fit in well there, and this way
future discussions can point to that page.
--
Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I don’t mean to be rude! Please
see http://email
.
Peter Kenny
From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of
Dimitris Chloupis
Sent: 08 September 2016 13:18
To: Any question about pharo is welcome
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Territorial Re-Licensing
well he did apologize
Please let's move on. My motivation was trying to see the logic behind
licenses in Pharo (not on popularity of GPL vs MIT), raised by a valid
concern on free riding, enclosure of the commons and reciprocity, which
is a hot topic with a lot of debate in free culture/knowledge
communities. I lear
well he did apologize
And these things do happen in all communities, I cannot begin to describe
the poison I have received in the #common-lisp irc channel. One time also
in their mailing list , some old member got annoyed for small reason with a
begineer and he gave him code to delete his hard dri
Hi Tudor,
I recognize the impedance with mail as an expression medium and most of
the time it was like you said, except when Stef addressed to me with
"It is amazing how you like talking" (is this some kind of invitation to
"just shut up!"? Is that a "remainder" I have not written enough code
Hi Offray,
I am sorry you feel down.
The wording of Stef did appear strong. However, please keep in mind that email
is a terrible medium for expressing and transmitting feelings. I would kindly
ask you to reconsider the emails and focus on the content and you will see that
the wording was not
Nice to know something good came out after taking all the heat. In my
case I learn about licensing with the reasons behind and not "just take
it!"...
My sources of information, the main spec.st site, made my mistake about
dual license a valid misinterpretation and even the idea that there are
You can be proud of you. I'm proud of you and I can tell you that I
really understand you. I can tell you that once I was tempted to change
the license of my new books because bad people could just take
everything. (yes this is silly when you read but I thought about it and
we even discussed it
Hi Hernan,
Thanks for your balanced response. Licensing discussion can be boring
but also crucial, hence the sometimes religious views on it. Like a
lot of things, from a distance it seems easy - but the devil is in the
details. Consider anyway that "Territorial" may otherwise have been a
singl
I consider GNU AGPL v3 a fair license choice which protects somehow
authors. After some talks with friends today, I began to consider it
useless for a niche community like Smalltalk *and* solo projects. I then
read all your mails, many posts in other communities, and finally asked for
advices. Conc
12 matches
Mail list logo
