[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: yincheng

Translating the documentation I want to translating the documentation to Simple Chines. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

I think that the best will be that somebody with a hole experience in PHP internals to write a book, I will sure buy it. Best regards, Emanuel Dejanu -Original Message- From: Eric Veldhuyzen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 6 iunie 2002 16:59 To: Markus Fischer Cc: fabwash; Eric Veldhuy

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

Aggregation sometimes involves delegation. The 'parent' object delegates requests to the right aggregated objects (in other cases, the 'parent' object returns its aggregated objects and you use them directly). Zeev At 10:43 PM 6/6/2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >Andi Gutmans wrote: > > The t

[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

i really agree with brad. actually, im the kind of person that would like php to turn into java while still having the php look and feel. i did a few courses of java my employer send me to and i really appreciate OO now that i got a taste of it. because of these courses i started programingen

[PHP-DEV] Zend Engine unloading extension in the wrong order

I have been tracking down a core dump with my php extension when it is unloading some of its shared libraries. I have shared extension that is link against libexpat and will load fine if it is the only on in the php.ini. If I then load xml.so extension then my extension it works fine, but if

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP in the future

Emacs!!! XEmacs!!! Emacs!!! XEmacs!!! Now seriosly kids. My opinion is that none of the modifications that have been discussed actually change the language into something better. Everything that you can do with the proposed modification, you can do without. Sure multiple inheritance makes t

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

> Actually - depending on the platform also: What platform is this? I'm dubious of these results, given the negative numbers for transfered bytes and transfer rate. Also, be sure to run your tests from a different machine, and make sure that you aren't maxing out your client. Last note is you r

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

At 18:53 6-6-2002, Cliff Woolley shared with all of us: >On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > > A user posted [1] a "benchmark" today in the German PHP Newsgroup [2] > > stating that Apache 2.0 and PHP (current HEAD) are about 20% slower > > than Apache 1.3. > > > > Are there

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

Andi Gutmans wrote: > The talk was about aggregation of instances of classes with auto-proxy. I think that's called delegation, not aggregation. Have a look at what the JavaLab guys at my University are doing under the term "delegation": http://javalab.cs.uni-bonn.de/research/darwin/

Re: [PHP-DEV] Snapshots not build correctly..

On 6 Jun 2002, Jim Winstead wrote: >Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At 09:25 PM 6/5/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote: >>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote: >>> >>> >At 11:35 PM 6/4/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote: >>> > >>> >> The source snapshots don't have the bison/flex gene

[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Alex Black wrote: >then PHP is pretty schitzo because someone made a GTK extensions for it that >seems to be supported by the core group. That's for building GUI >applications last I checked. (Actually the model was so good we're using it >in binarycloud!) GTK is just a c

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

Andi, Before you go ahead with this I would like to discuss it some more too. I'm wondering if we can fully support MI but i don't want to start this conversation now. btw: i like the contains better than aggergates. - brad --- Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A couple of months ag

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

A couple of months ago it was agreed on how to get multiple inheritance like behavior in a way which could work with PHP. I just haven't had time to implement it yet. The talk was about aggregation of instances of classes with auto-proxy. So you'd do something like: class foo extends bar contain

[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

--- Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 08:26 PM 6/6/2002, brad lafountain wrote: > > >--- Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > At 07:01 PM 6/6/2002, brad lafountain wrote: > > > >Please don't reply to this email saying Use Java... Because php is > > different > > > >than java

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

> I believe the OO level we have in ZE2 is the upper limit > of what a scripting language should have. There's no doubt in my mind > that going beyond that is going to complicate the language beyond what > our average users want. I would have to disagree to this statement extremly. It would n

RE: [PHP-DEV] Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

> > > A user posted [1] a "benchmark" today in the German PHP Newsgroup [2] > > > stating that Apache 2.0 and PHP (current HEAD) are about 20% slower > > > than Apache 1.3. On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:05:16AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > It doesn't really surprise me. The bucket brigade

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] preg_match(_all) support for capturing offsets

I will take a look at this soon, thanks. On Thu, 06 Jun 2002, David Brown wrote: > Hi Andrei, all: > > (This is a re-send of a previous message that received no replies; my > apologies if you've already seen/considered it) > > In a previous patch > (http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.de

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] preg_match(_all) support for capturing offsets

Hi Andrei, all: (This is a re-send of a previous message that received no replies; my apologies if you've already seen/considered it) In a previous patch (http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.dev&article=84281), support was added to preg_split for capturing offsets along with matches. The

[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

At 08:26 PM 6/6/2002, brad lafountain wrote: >--- Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 07:01 PM 6/6/2002, brad lafountain wrote: > > >Please don't reply to this email saying Use Java... Because php is > different > > >than java and always will be even with these new features. > > > > B

[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

>> Brad, I beg you, there's nothing anybody can say on this list that would >> lead this to closure. Nothing. I believe that adding the things you >> mentioned does indeed turn PHP into Java, just a messy Java, Java which is >> worse at being Java than the real one is, and torn apart when compar

[PHP-DEV] exec etc. on Windows: why does it use cmd.exe ?

The shell execution commands on Windows execute a "cmd /c program" for running command-line programs. I have seen bug reports asking for a change but there hasn't been one. What's the reason for using "cmd"? Isn't it possible to directly execute those programs? The problem with using cmd.exe is

[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

--- Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 07:01 PM 6/6/2002, brad lafountain wrote: > >Please don't reply to this email saying Use Java... Because php is different > >than java and always will be even with these new features. > > Brad, I beg you, there's nothing anybody can say on this li

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 07:18:22PM +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > Cliff Woolley wrote: > > Namely, we need to be able to give Zend's lexer buffers to scan rather > > than handing it a file descriptor. > > Last time I talked to Zeev about this he said that this has been added. > (Acceptin

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

Cliff Woolley wrote: > Namely, we need to be able to give Zend's lexer buffers to scan rather > than handing it a file descriptor. Last time I talked to Zeev about this he said that this has been added. (Accepting a buffer instead of a file handle.) -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebasti

[PHP-DEV] Re: Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > A user posted [1] a "benchmark" today in the German PHP Newsgroup [2] > stating that Apache 2.0 and PHP (current HEAD) are about 20% slower > than Apache 1.3. > > Are there any official benchmarks out there? I can't quite believe > this...

[PHP-DEV] Re: Introducing EXCPLICIT

I wouldn't take my opinion as law, as I'm not part of the core PHP Group or anything, so I don't speak for anyone but myself. All I'm saying is that I seem to remember this issue being brought up before, and the result was that PHP is not a strong typed language, and probably won't become one

Re: [PHP-DEV] Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:05:16AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > A user posted [1] a "benchmark" today in the German PHP Newsgroup [2] > > stating that Apache 2.0 and PHP (current HEAD) are about 20% slower > > than Apache 1.3. > > > > Are there any official benchmarks out there? I can'

[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] PHP in the future

At 07:01 PM 6/6/2002, brad lafountain wrote: >Please don't reply to this email saying Use Java... Because php is different >than java and always will be even with these new features. Brad, I beg you, there's nothing anybody can say on this list that would lead this to closure. Nothing. I belie

Re: [PHP-DEV] Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

> A user posted [1] a "benchmark" today in the German PHP Newsgroup [2] > stating that Apache 2.0 and PHP (current HEAD) are about 20% slower > than Apache 1.3. > > Are there any official benchmarks out there? I can't quite believe > this... It doesn't really surprise me. The bucket br

Re: [PHP-DEV] Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

At 07:00 PM 6/6/2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > A user posted [1] a "benchmark" today in the German PHP Newsgroup [2] > stating that Apache 2.0 and PHP (current HEAD) are about 20% slower > than Apache 1.3. > > Are there any official benchmarks out there? I can't quite believe > this..

[PHP-DEV] PHP in the future

Ok I know this email has been posted again and again. But lets look at this objectivly. PHP was designed for the web. It's "perfect" in alot of ways for that market. Maybe we can shift the focus of php from the web to application development. Again i know this has been discussed and been shot dow

[PHP-DEV] Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

A user posted [1] a "benchmark" today in the German PHP Newsgroup [2] stating that Apache 2.0 and PHP (current HEAD) are about 20% slower than Apache 1.3. Are there any official benchmarks out there? I can't quite believe this... -- [1] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2] news:

[PHP-DEV] Re: Introducing EXCPLICIT

thank you for your reply, i'll change to c# as soon as i've finished my current projects. regards, ilker "J Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I seem to remember strong typing being brought up before, and I also seem to > remember it bei

[PHP-DEV] Re: Introducing EXCPLICIT

I seem to remember strong typing being brought up before, and I also seem to remember it being shot down. The consensus seemed to be if you want a strongly-typed language, use Java. Or C. Or C++. Or something other than PHP that has strong data typing. Have things changed since then? J Ilk

Re: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

Yes, that's basically what I sent him as an example. I think the ext/standard/array.c is a good place to look for this information too. Fab. - Original Message - From: "Rasmus Lerdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Eric Veldhuyzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "fabwash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Marku

Re: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

> Well, I think you might be able to help me then. I want to retrieve an > array and walk throught it. Should be pretty simple, right? Think of which PHP functions do this and go have a look. Basically think of how you do it in PHP at the low level. You would do something like this: reset($arr

[PHP-DEV] Newbie question about building GD...

Hi ng! I was wondering if anyone had a howto for compiling gd2.0.1 on Win32? I have managed to get the CGI and two SAPI modules to compile, and have even managed to get a couple of simple extensions (simple cos I managed to get them to compile!) such as sockets and win32api to build, but gd seem

Re: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:36:29AM -0400, fabwash wrote: > > It would be nice it there was some REAL documentation about the API... > > > Amen to that!!!.. I spent exactely 5 1/2 hours yesterday trying to create a > resource that is a structure which contains a set of pointers to an array of > obj

Re: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 03:45:08PM +0200, Markus Fischer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:36:29AM -0400, fabwash wrote : > > > It would be nice it there was some REAL documentation about the API... > > > > > Amen to that!!!.. I spent exactely 5 1/2 hours yesterday trying to create a > > resour

Re: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

Hi Markus, I think I know those pages by heart :) Doesn't mean they all make sense to me for now. I'm sure that when I get some experience I will find that they make a lot of sense, and that each word should give me a clue, but this is a high level overview of the API, what we need is a real docu

Re: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:36:29AM -0400, fabwash wrote : > > It would be nice it there was some REAL documentation about the API... > > > Amen to that!!!.. I spent exactely 5 1/2 hours yesterday trying to create a > resource that is a structure which contains a set of pointers to an array of > o

Re: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

> It would be nice it there was some REAL documentation about the API... > Amen to that!!!.. I spent exactely 5 1/2 hours yesterday trying to create a resource that is a structure which contains a set of pointers to an array of objects (yeah it's complicated but it's great when it works !), then l

[PHP-DEV] Bundled gdlib

I think it would be the best if we changed config option from --with-gd=php to just --with-gd when we want to use bundled gdlib. Edin -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] Linuxtag Coordination

I will be at Linuxtag on Sunday. I will have a cellphone. The number is +49 170 2231 811. I will not have net access. You need to summon me by phone (or by calling my name thrice while standing in a properly ornamented pentagram). Kristian -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] bug in domxml_get_element_by_id

Recently the function domxml_get_element_by_id was changed from using an xpath query //*[@ID = '%s'] to actually using the ID hash from the DTD, which makes perfect sense. But for the following string: ]> foo foo hey there I get for $xml->ids() a list nodeset of 2 nodes, but

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-EVANGELISM] ANN: QA & Evangelism Call to Arms @ LinuxTag

When everyone gets into linuxtag, we can work out the best time for a meeting and take it from there, i think. -- james ___ This mail sent using V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.co.uk -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: progcom

Translating the documentation to Korean. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] Introducing EXCPLICIT

i'd like to discuss with you a growing problem regarding php applications. i see the features taken into account for ze2 have been made regarding the needs of advanced php developers who design complete applications with php instead of just dumping out some dynamic content. php is ease of use be

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch-tastic!

[ I copy this to php-dev again, despite the fact that Ilker sent this to me in private mail, because I want to promote the concept of warnings for named accesses to _-members again. Privacy in C++/Java style will raise a lot of issues on this list again, if it is introduced to PHP. My propos

Re: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:27:06AM +0200, Markus Fischer wrote: > You can fech the zval * for _SESSION from the > EG(symbol_table), e.g. something like this (untested): > > zval **z_sess; > if (zend_hash_find(&EG(symbol_table), "_SESSION", sizeof("_SESSION")-1, >(void**)&z_sess)

Re: [PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

You can fech the zval * for _SESSION from the EG(symbol_table), e.g. something like this (untested): zval **z_sess; if (zend_hash_find(&EG(symbol_table), "_SESSION", sizeof("_SESSION")-1, (void**)&z_sess) == SUCCESS) { ... } Try something like cd php4/ex

[PHP-DEV] How do I access a hash from an extention/module?

Hi, I have posted this message before to the general list, but it seems nobody there can help me so I hope someone here might know... I am a bit stuck right now, I want to access the values of a global hash (actually it is a session variable) from within my PHP extention/module. So I want to be

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #16747 Updated: Empty file upload field results in "No file uploaded in Unknown on line 0" warn

Hi, forget it. Stefan has informed me that this is fixed in CVS. - Markus On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:26:25AM +0200, Markus Fischer wrote : > Hello, > > Jani, I don't quite understand this too why we really need a > php_error() here when no file is uploaded at all? IMHO

[PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #16747 Updated: Empty file upload field results in "No file uploaded in Unknown on line 0" warn

Hello, Jani, I don't quite understand this too why we really need a php_error() here when no file is uploaded at all? IMHO there's nothing wrong with it. Other opinions ? - Markus On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 08:06:29AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > ID:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Patch-tastic!

Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 16:41 schrieb Jason T. Greene: > If '+' concatenates what does '-' do? It drives you nuts. At least it does so in pike, which is a (discretionary, it has a type "mixed") statically typed language and overloads the arithmetic operators for string types. See http://pi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch-tastic!

Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 10:44 schrieb Ilker Cetinkaya: > > Nice, but why not overload + for strings to do the > > concatenation? > > i totally agree, overloading + for string concat is really > desireable. No, it is a nightmare. PHP is a dynamically typed language, that is, the actual langua