On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 02:13 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
[1] Function names for user-level functions should be enclosed with in
the PHP_FUNCTION() macro. They should be in lowercase, with words
underscore delimited, with care taken
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
> > [1] Function names for user-level functions should be enclosed with in
> > the PHP_FUNCTION() macro. They should be in lowercase, with words
> > underscore delimited, with care taken to minimize the letter count.
>
> OK, I will admit the '_
For what it's worth, I am in agreement with Derick... Consistency is
important..
Besides... A rose is still a rose, even if it's called
sweet_smelling_flower ;)
>OK, I will admit the '_' is then OK, but I rather do not use
>it in this case, since I would like to use that for a more
>session
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 12:17 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 02:49 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hello,
while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added
to the CVS recently:
+ PHP_F
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 02:49 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added
> > to the CVS recently:
> >
> > + PHP_FE(snmpv3get, NULL)
> > + PHP_FE(snmpv3w
Hi all,
(sorry if you receive it duplicate, but it did not seem to make the list
last time.)
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 02:49 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hello,
while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added
to the CVS recently:
+ PHP_FE(snmpv3get, NULL)
+
+1
>-Original Message-
>From: Ilia A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:23 PM
>To: Derick Rethans; PHP Developers Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New SNMP function names
>
>
>Consistency is always good and adding aliases for
Consistency is always good and adding aliases for newly added functions seems
like a recipe for bloat & confusion.
+1 on the proposed changes.
Ilia
On December 4, 2002 08:49 am, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while browsing the CVS I found that the following functions were added
> to the CV
+1 for me
Although I do remember the reasoning for it, it doesn't mean I like the
use of the snmpv3 naming scheme either. So if anyone has any better
suggestions for these, I'd still like to hear them.
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 08:49 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hello,
while browsing
