This is not a support forum. So don't expect an answer, but you will be
marked as spam.
You can ask questions over https://stackoverflow.com or similar places.
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt , http
>
>
>>> I totally disagree that there is no need for test packages.
>
Question here is which unit test framework ( may be phpunit ) ? What about
others. Or all in one util package.
> The specifications for the interfaces are generally quite strict, but,
> particularly with versions that do not
Hi all,
> The package consists of interfaces - so there's nothing really to test,
> and there's no CI or anything like that set up. (and it wouldn't work if
> there were, because there's no dependency on PHPUnit although it's
> extending that class.)
>
> This test is for implementations - so
Be patient. Ian already mentioned it is in queue. Please give him some time
till he is awake from sleep. :-).
On Fri 12 Oct, 2018, 5:53 PM Rasmus Schultz, wrote:
> It still says it's deleted... is it waiting for someone to moderate, or
> has it really been deleted?
>
> Can one of the moderators
? )
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5vQMLutP1JQq4q8apt-pTNMBfJYqjVQ2GfqxRAWcHM/edit#gid=0
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt , http://www.xing.com/profile/Hari_KT
Skype : kthari85
Twitter
Hi Mathew,
Thank you for the detailed answer.
Not a native English speaker, so I don't know if I can convince you or
others about the same.
Writing inline.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Hari K T <kthar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have send a PR to update the Interface so
://github.com/http-interop/http-server-handler
https://github.com/http-interop/http-server-middleware
I think we can all agree to make this happen, so that it will not make the
editors and working group and everyone participated in the PSR not
consuming or dragging the PSR.
Thank you.
*Hari K T*
You can
>
> https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/tree/master/proposed/http-middleware
>
The above link got broken due to renaming the folder.
For the record this is the new location :
https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/tree/1341f19927f170af9fdd30e9bb2e850bedffb12c/proposed/http-handlers
parsed etc.
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt , http://www.xing.com/profile/Hari_KT
Skype : kthari85
Twitter : harikt
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Thomas Gnandt <thomas_gna...@gmx.net>
For the record there are multiple providers that does the same currently .
Examples :
https://github.com/Stampie/Stampie
https://github.com/gabrielbull/omnimail
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt
Hey Larry Garfield,
You have linked to the same form not the response.
I like your write up about the various problems that can occur if we go for
psr/log 2.0 .
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt
Hi,
1. Beau Simensen
2. Korvin Szanto
3. Matthew Weier O'Phinney
4. Larry Garfield
5. Lukas Kahwe Smith
6. David Négrier
7. Tobias Nyholm
8. Chris Tankersley
9. Jeremy Coates
10. Cees-Jan Kiewiet
11. Jason Coward
12. Sara Golemon
13. Marc Alexander
14. Samantha Quiñones
15. Stefano Torresi
16.
I believe , we should allow Router to do one thing, finding / matching the
route, generating the route.
Dispatching based on the route should be done by dispatcher.
If you are curious what I am talking consider looking into the examples
Hi,
Not against anyone conducting in election. But here I do want to agree with
Adam and Roman's views and please do look into the threads. We want to make
a better FIG and not political FIG.
We don't need dramas again like people resigning from core committees.
*Hari K T*
You can ring me
or , but you could
get rid of this BC break via something like this .
https://3v4l.org/bB0Oj
The $params and $setters are for in case the container need to alter the
values passed on run time.
Thank you
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http
This was a discussion by Taylor regarding the same :
https://github.com/container-interop/container-interop/issues/6 .
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt , http://www.xing.com/profile/Hari_KT
Skype
Hi David,
Thanks for taking your time looking into this.
I am for Solution 2.
I am also interested to hear from Fabien considering the sentence
"However, depending on the implementor design and/or user configuration,
different values might be returned, so user SHOULD NOT rely on getting the
Hi @mwop,
Thank you for your comments.
I am writing inline for I don't miss anything.
> The only concern to me is
> > https://github.com/container-interop/container-interop/issues/69
> regarding
> > return value of get .
> >
> > Basically this is the text :
> >
> > Two successive calls to get
Hi,
The only concern to me is
https://github.com/container-interop/container-interop/issues/69 regarding
return value of get .
Basically this is the text :
Two successive calls to get with the same identifier SHOULD return the same
value. However, depending on the implementor design and/or user
Hi Rasmus,
Trying to write inline, so I don't miss your question.
> Why do you want the folder name to be named assets itself ?
>
> The folder has to have a name - "assets" seemed like the logical choice.
>
> Perhaps what you're really wondering is, why a single folder and not a
> map like in
tc.
Thank you
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt , http://www.xing.com/profile/Hari_KT
Skype : kthari85
Twitter : harikt
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Rasmus Schultz <ras...@mindp
I wonder why do we bother too much about PSR-8 now?
If you all bother that much it should never have been introduced here.
Thank you
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt , http://www.xing.com/profile
and understanding.
If the Interface suffix is too long, there are some other projects
following "I" prefix like IResponse .
I don't like but just a thought ;-) .
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/har
Hi Phil,
Thank you for your write up.
> We know about the bylaws. :) If we were following the bylaws to the letter
> and ignoring precedence, then it would be fine. What is being said in this
> thread, is that when the Beau/Silex vote happened, Paul used a lot of
> arguments as to why Beau
ive of a project?
And can write a "disclose conflicts of interest"?
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt , http://www.xing.com/profile/Hari_KT
Skype : kthari85
Twitter : harikt
On Fri, Aug 12, 20
Hi all,
Prevention is better than cure.
So I guess it will be good to push than wait for people to write what they
want and later argue and wait. I agree with Paul that there can be
drawbacks, but we can always change / move to another PSR as we did for
PSR-0 to PSR-4 and also erratas.
--
You
Hi all,
I came across the slides[1] by Michael Cullum from his recent talk.
I would encourage everyone who has taken part in this discussion to look
into those slides. It is well crafted and you will understand some history
about PHP-FIG.
And I would like to close this by taking one of the
to vote / discuss about standards ?
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt , http://www.xing.com/profile/Hari_KT
Skype : kthari85
Twitter : harikt
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
28 matches
Mail list logo
