On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Eric Butera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I generate my data access objects too. It goes against my better
judgment, but performance wins out in this specific situation.
getting off the point
Hello to all my fellow members of the PHP community.
As a personal rule i always use $this in front of class members, but i
always knew from others programing languages and i guess I just
thought it was same in PHP that without $this keyword it should work
just the same, however in the code
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:55 AM, uaca man [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to all my fellow members of the PHP community.
As a personal rule i always use $this in front of class members, but i
always knew from others programing languages and i guess I just
thought it was same in PHP that
uaca man schreef:
Hello to all my fellow members of the PHP community.
As a personal rule i always use $this in front of class members, but i
always knew from others programing languages and i guess I just
thought it was same in PHP that without $this keyword it should work
just the same,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(using $this-foo or MyClass::$foo for static properties).
also self::
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Eric Butera wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(using $this-foo or MyClass::$foo for static properties).
also self::
Actually within a class, I think you must self:: before a static
property or something shows up in the error log.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Micah Gersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(using $this-foo or MyClass::$foo for static properties).
also self::
Actually within a class, I think you must
Nathan Nobbe schreef:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Micah Gersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(using $this-foo or MyClass::$foo for static properties).
also self::
Actually within a class, I
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Nobbe schreef:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Micah Gersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(using $this-foo or
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... now had 'self' been late (statically) bound ... no I won't go there, we
get
'static' very soon now :-P
and lets not forget the __*Static() magic method suite we're getting too :)
-nathan
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Eric Butera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Active Record sucks :P
i prefer code generation to runtime introspection, but runtime
introspection+code generation, well thats a compromise i can live w/ ;)
-nathan
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Eric Butera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Active Record sucks :P
i prefer code generation to runtime introspection, but runtime
introspection+code generation, well thats a compromise i can live
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Eric Butera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I generate my data access objects too. It goes against my better
judgment, but performance wins out in this specific situation.
getting off the point of the thread (i could care less :D), but have you
seen the model taken
13 matches
Mail list logo
