Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will take
html generation jobs from server side.
Whole thing of Server Side MVC and other yada yada was became joke. Those
server siders become JSON pushers for JS frameworks.
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will take
html generation jobs from server side.
Whole thing of Server Side MVC and other yada yada was became
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:33:58 Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will
take html generation jobs from server side.
Whole
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:58 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:33:58 Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS
At 10:24 AM -0400 3/23/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
My point is, just because new techniques and technoloigies
come out, is in no way a boundary condition on an existing technology's
lifespan or efficacy in any particular environment. The deprecation of
usefulness of any technology is based on
2009/3/23 tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com:
However, I have heard of new javascript being run server-side. What's the
likelihood of that catching on and surpassing php?
http://aptana.com/jaxer
I really like the idea, but I'm yet to have a good reason to try it.
If you're starting from scratch it
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:43 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 10:24 AM -0400 3/23/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
My point is, just because new techniques and technoloigies
come out, is in no way a boundary condition on an existing technology's
lifespan or efficacy in any particular
@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
2009/3/23 tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com:
However, I have heard of new javascript being run server-side.
What's the
likelihood of that catching on and surpassing php?
http://aptana.com/jaxer
I really like the idea, but I'm yet to have a good
-Original Message-
From: Sancar Saran [mailto:sancar.sa...@evodot.com]
Sent: 23 March 2009 11:52 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS
Arno Kuhl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sancar Saran [mailto:sancar.sa...@evodot.com]
Sent: 23 March 2009 11:52 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.netwrote:
Arno Kuhl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sancar Saran [mailto:sancar.sa...@evodot.com]
Sent: 23 March 2009 11:52 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Probably
At 10:50 AM -0400 3/23/09, Bastien Koert wrote:
Tedd,
JS has been running on MS servers for a long time. It was always
viewes as an acceptable replacement for vbscript.
Well -- that's been my fear. I think that M$ is trying to get it's
foot into this so they can charge for it -- similar to
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tedd tedd.sperl...@gmail.com wrote:
At 10:50 AM -0400 3/23/09, Bastien Koert wrote:
Tedd,
JS has been running on MS servers for a long time. It was always viewes as
an acceptable replacement for vbscript.
Well -- that's been my fear. I think that M$ is
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 10:43 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 10:24 AM -0400 3/23/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
My point is, just because new techniques and technoloigies
come out, is in no way a boundary condition on an existing technology's
lifespan or efficacy in any particular environment. The
On Monday 23 March 2009 16:24:55 Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:58 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:33:58 Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
From: Daniel Kolbo
P.P.P.S. What might be nice is to have an online repository of PHP
community approved classes, then programmers could mix and match
'modules' as needed...well now I am sounding like that snake oil
salesman.
You mean something like CPAN over in the Perl arena? Or
Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will take
html generation jobs from server side.
No it won't.
People are getting sick and tired of allowing third scripts to modify
the DOM - browsers are
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
P.P.P.S. What might be nice is to have an online repository of PHP
community approved classes, then programmers could mix and match
'modules' as needed...well now I am sounding like that snake oil salesman.
There is a php class web site that focuses on OO
Bob McConnell wrote:
However, don't limit it to classes. There
are enough non-OO people that collections of usable function libraries
should also be worth assembling. I would also suggest including unit
test fixtures and utilities in any collection.
Bob McConnell
Most functions can be
Sorry for top posting, but here goes...
Stopping third party js from running on the client will never happen.
If so, you just killed your servers thru put in attempting to handle
things like google maps, google analytics and other fun things coming
out of companies like that ( google, zoho
Phpster wrote:
Sorry for top posting, but here goes...
Stopping third party js from running on the client will never happen. If
so, you just killed your servers thru put in attempting to handle things
like google maps, google analytics and other fun things coming out of
companies like that (
Tony Marston wrote:
Nitsan Bin-Nun nit...@binnun.co.il wrote in message
news:d47da0100903220910q7bb66706s6255f0fc89b98...@mail.gmail.com...
Don't forget to attach the message to the list.
Regarding the frameworks, which of them, for your opinion, will take the
fastest time to learn and get
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 10:54 -1000, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Hello,
I changed the subject because I did not want to steal Nitsan's thread.
I hope you started a New email and didn't just change the subject...
otherwise you've hijacked the thread. I can't tell I keep threading off.
There seem to
: Daniel Kolbo [mailto:kolb0...@umn.edu]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 4:54 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Cc: Tony Marston
Subject: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Tony Marston wrote:
Nitsan Bin-Nun nit...@binnun.co.il wrote in message
news:d47da0100903220910q7bb66706s6255f0fc89b98...@mail.gmail.com
there.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kolbo [mailto:kolb0...@umn.edu]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 4:54 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Cc: Tony Marston
Subject: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Tony Marston wrote:
Nitsan Bin-Nun nit...@binnun.co.il wrote in message
25 matches
Mail list logo
