On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Matt Ficken wrote:
> Yes, I am willing to move my repo from github.com/OSTC/PFTT2 to git.php.net.
>
> Let me know if you need any information from me to help to that.
>
> I don't know if I have karma to patch qaweb, so please check that.
I've created the (empty)
> >
> > And I did, also you forgot that this project is many years old, way
> > before we even had travisci support or the like. We have been testing
> > all commits and releases using it and provided critical feedback since
> > then. Back then git was not available in php.net and we were not
> > w
Hi Hannes,
> -Original Message-
> From: hannes.magnus...@gmail.com
> [mailto:hannes.magnus...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hannes Magnusson
>
>
> The more datapoints we have, the better!
> Matt and buddies have receieved requests to make these datapoints public
> because it was not available
Good news. I appreciate your understanding!
-Hannes
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> I stop now this discussion. I am not here to get constantly insulted. And I
> even less inclined to repeat the same thing over and over as you obviously
> not read my replies carefully.
>
I stop now this discussion. I am not here to get constantly insulted. And I
even less inclined to repeat the same thing over and over as you obviously
not read my replies carefully.
Enjoy your day still,
On Jan 21, 2014 9:06 PM, "Hannes Magnusson" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Pie
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>>
Just because the people behind the tool have php.net acco
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi Hannes,
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Matt Ficken
>> wrote:
>>> What about posting my test results on qa.php.net? The summary email
>>> messages could continue as is, o
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>
>>> Just because the people behind the tool have php.net accounts does not
>>> mean that a tool developed outside the php
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
>> Just because the people behind the tool have php.net accounts does not
>> mean that a tool developed outside the php.net domain is automatically
>> php.net property. This is not a
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> Just because the people behind the tool have php.net accounts does not
> mean that a tool developed outside the php.net domain is automatically
> php.net property. This is not a corporate world that screws you over
> and you have not sign
hi Hannes,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Matt Ficken wrote:
>> What about posting my test results on qa.php.net? The summary email
>> messages could continue as is, or only include a link to the appropriate
>> part of qa.php.net or
11 matches
Mail list logo
