> > Erm. It is a bit buggy. It shows deleted files. We do
> > not have currently a migration.xml or a phpdevel.xml
> > in our appendices directory. Also we do not have
> > several function xml-s in the functions directory.
> Getting around to looking at this issue.
> Could you be more specific?
>
> The notes in the online manual are piling up again. The job
> of managing these things is much much too big for a small
> group of people. What do you guys think of the idea of making
> it possible for individuals to register themselves as
> maintainers of individual manual pages?
Now [EMAIL P
jah Fri Jul 27 02:13:31 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc global.ent
Log:
Not available on old site anymore.
Index: phpdoc/global.ent
diff -u phpdoc/global.ent:1.101 phpdoc/global.ent:1.102
--- phpdoc/global.ent:1.101 Thu Jul 26 14:04:11 2001
+
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Receive $1,000 COMMISSION on a $0 down SALE !!
DID YOU MAKE $5,000 LAST MONTH? IF NOT,
YOU NEED TO JOIN US TODAY!
Market the hottest consumer savings package in
America today and earn up to $1,000 each and
every time someone joins for $0 DOWN!
Imagine b
rasmus Thu Jul 26 19:18:55 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsxslt.xml
Log:
Each parameter needs to be inside its own paramdef tag
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/xslt.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/xslt.xml:1.18 phpdoc/en/functions/xslt.xml:1
> Erm. It is a bit buggy. It shows deleted files. We do
> not have currently a migration.xml or a phpdevel.xml
> in our appendices directory. Also we do not have
> several function xml-s in the functions directory.
Getting around to looking at this issue.
Could you be more specific? As far as I
The notes in the online manual are piling up again. The job of managing
these things is much much too big for a small group of people. What do
you guys think of the idea of making it possible for individuals to
register themselves as maintainers of individual manual pages?
That is, I might deci
Sorry, one test bug left inside. Now corrected.
Goba
Hi!
I have corrected the hungarian entites, that
were bogus in the DSSL entity definitions.
Please update the autogenerator framework,
to use this file instead of the old one.
Hope it will be good, make said nothing bad.
This replaces docbook/common/dbl1hu.ent
I will post this to Normal Walsh,
THIS IS THE SUPER FAST ONE!
While you're waiting for the others to work, this little gem will put $10,00 in
your pockett in as little as two weeks!!..I guarantee it!! Your only cost is a
couple hours of your time and $10 or $20. That's it.
THE GIFTING CLUB (pl
gobaThu Jul 26 14:04:11 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc global.ent
Log:
Sorry for breaking the other languages (incl. hu :).
Readding Snaps url (just to give time for translators
to remove this section from their preface.xml, and do
not break buildi
> Then let's decide what versions we *will* build.
HTML : yes, sure, plain format, as it is now, with
many compressed formats (tar.gz, tar.bz2, zip?)
TEXT : it is useless IMHO. Who is using it and how one
large textfile can be used??? Although it's
build process is not compl
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> >> Again, we have no RFT versions now...
> >> TeX versions are used to build PDF, so
> >> let it stay (am I right?)
> >
> >We can build RTF versions. The TeX version can be viewed with any dvi
> >viewer. With the dvi files we can build PostScript
What are the news about the automatic updates
of CHM manuals on php.net? I can see no changes
in the files up there... :
Goba
gobaThu Jul 26 07:15:46 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/hu/appendices reserved.xml
Log:
BAD BAD updates. Need to comment these out, to make the
hungarian manual build again, until I can update install.xml
and oop.xml (the entries commented out here
gobaThu Jul 26 07:09:08 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/hu/chapters install.xml
Log:
BAD BAD hacks to make the hungarian manual build.
Adding the missing entities. Although the install.xml
needs a full update in some days, but I have no time
to do this
damsThu Jul 26 06:19:07 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsprinter.xml
Log:
Cosmetics updates.
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/printer.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/printer.xml:1.6 phpdoc/en/functions/printer.xml:1.7
--- phpdoc/en/functions/p
Title: RE: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en preface.xml
>> Again, we have no RFT versions now...
>> TeX versions are used to build PDF, so
>> let it stay (am I right?)
>
>We can build RTF versions. The TeX version can be viewed with any dvi
>viewer. With the dvi files we can build PostScript an
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 09:02:57AM -, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> Modified files:
> /phpdoc/enpreface.xml
> Log:
> Again, we have no RFT versions now...
> TeX versions are used to build PDF, so
> let it stay (am I right?)
We can build RTF versions. The TeX vers
gobaThu Jul 26 05:24:31 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsimap.xml
Log:
Closing bug #12391
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/imap.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/imap.xml:1.46 phpdoc/en/functions/imap.xml:1.47
--- phpdoc/en/functions/imap.xml
Hi!
There was a thread some months ago, about making a naming
convention of the manual packages.
No look at the names:
manual.txt.gz
bigmanual.html.gz
manual.tar.gz
manual.tar.bz2
manual.zip
manual.pdf
manual_doc.pdb
manual_isilo.pdb
manual.chm
There is no convention in these names. With palm
gobaThu Jul 26 05:02:57 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en preface.xml
Log:
Again, we have no RFT versions now...
TeX versions are used to build PDF, so
let it stay (am I right?)
Index: phpdoc/en/preface.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/preface.xml:1.8 php
gobaThu Jul 26 05:00:29 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en preface.xml
Log:
One space identation... Only a whitespace change.
Index: phpdoc/en/preface.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/preface.xml:1.7 phpdoc/en/preface.xml:1.8
--- phpdoc/en/preface.xml:1.7 Thu J
gobaThu Jul 26 04:54:04 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc global.ent
/phpdoc/en preface.xml
Log:
Updating Preface:
- PHP is not only a hypertext preprocessor (please
correct my english, if it is not right :)
- There are many people contr
on 26/07/01 09:45, Hojtsy Gabor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
>Jim suggested at phpweb, that we should drop the .zip version sometime,
>because Windows zip programs can handle .gz. I don't know that this is the
>best time or not to do this...
>.gz and .bz2 is needed IMHO :) Maybe we can drop
Hi!
Is there any way to get back the build dates in the HTML
manuals somehow. It would be good for downloaders to see
when it was built...
This is what version.ent.in is ment to be I guess...
Goba
Title: RE: [PHP-DOC] PDF manual - about compression
>As the PDF manuals should be coming back really soon now, I'm thinking
>about compressing them, because the file size is is quite big
>(approx. 11M per language). What do you think, should they be offered
>as .gz, .bz2 and .zip versions lik
27 matches
Mail list logo
