> >>See suggested diff below.. my livedocs is broken for the contributors
> >>entity for some reason, and I don't have time to fix it right now.
> >
> > Its already fixed :)
> > http://livedocs.aborla.net/patch.php?id=include.entities
>
> Do you have a list with all your pending livedocs patches? I
See suggested diff below.. my livedocs is broken for the contributors
entity for some reason, and I don't have time to fix it right now.
Its already fixed :)
http://livedocs.aborla.net/patch.php?id=include.entities
Do you have a list with all your pending livedocs patches? It would be
nice to send
> +1 for a big list of all contributors
>
> Ranking/Rating is like measuring and comparing penis size.
> It's meaningless for the majority of people reading the docs and
> serves only as an ego boost for the *ahem* big committers and inspires
> penis envy in the not-so-big committers.
>
> We
> +1 for a big list of all contributors
+1,
because it's easier to maintain. Putting people to inactive and back
again time-to-time is impossible i think.
Heilig Cece Szabolcs
+1 for a big list of all contributors
Ranking/Rating is like measuring and comparing penis size.
It's meaningless for the majority of people reading the docs and
serves only as an ego boost for the *ahem* big committers and inspires
penis envy in the not-so-big committers.
We don't really nee
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > How about this, have that list include the people on the
> > frontpage and simply title it:
> >
> > Contributors to the PHP Manual
> >
> > Inactive or not, all of these people are contributors. Sure
> > some people will be listed in both places but n
> See suggested diff below.. my livedocs is broken for the contributors
> entity for some reason, and I don't have time to fix it right now.
Its already fixed :)
http://livedocs.aborla.net/patch.php?id=include.entities
Nuno
How about this, have that list include the people on the
frontpage and simply title it:
Contributors to the PHP Manual
Inactive or not, all of these people are contributors. Sure
some people will be listed in both places but not many.
Without more text, this implies, that the list of contributor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
| I would appreciate if someone with better English skills would reword
| those entities, so they fit into the positive image the whole crediting
| is supposed to be under.
See suggested diff below.. my livedocs is broken for the con
How about this, have that list include the people on the
frontpage and simply title it:
Contributors to the PHP Manual
Inactive or not, all of these people are contributors. Sure
some people will be listed in both places but not many.
Regards,
Philip
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote
So, allow users to opt out of the "inactive" page.
Would that solve the problem?
Or better word it so that it does not indicate that the listed people
are *completely* inactive currently.
Just remove this whole section.
s/section/pthrase I mean
Especially this part looks bad:
Authors and Editors
Al
That's insulting to me. Looking again and seeing Wez's name on that list I
should think it'd be insulting to him too (while he's not done much content,
his livedocs contributions have been significant).
IMO livedocs has nothing to do with this, that's a new tool that's not
in use and I'm sure Wez
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Sara Golemon wrote:
> That's insulting to me. Looking again and seeing Wez's name on that list I
> should think it'd be insulting to him too (while he's not done much content,
> his livedocs contributions have been significant).
IMO livedocs has nothing to do with this, that
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> > > So, allow users to opt out of the "inactive" page.
> > > Would that solve the problem?
> >
> > Or better word it so that it does not indicate that the listed people
> > are *completely* inactive currently
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> > > So, allow users to opt out of the "inactive" page.
> > > Would that solve the problem?
> >
> > Or better word it so that it does not indicate that the listed people
> > are *completely* inactive currently.
>
> Just remove this whole section.
>
>
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> The list of 'currently not that active' people was not meant to put
> those to shame,
But that how it looks like (to me).
> Do you think that it is a shame to be on the 'currently not active' list?
Yes, if were an author I'd think so. Why not just merg
> >>>Let me rephrase: I take exception to the adjective "inactive". It
> >>>minimizes my efforts to bridge the gap between development and
> >>>documentation.
> >>
> >>Excuse me, but I don't undestand what you mean here.
> >
> > I'll put it bluntly then: If I'm seen as inactive, then perhaps I
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > So, allow users to opt out of the "inactive" page.
> > Would that solve the problem?
>
> Or better word it so that it does not indicate that the listed people
> are *completely* inactive currently.
Just remove this whole section.
Derick
Let me rephrase: I take exception to the adjective "inactive". It
minimizes my efforts to bridge the gap between development and
documentation.
Excuse me, but I don't undestand what you mean here.
I'll put it bluntly then: If I'm seen as inactive, then perhaps I should
just live up to that repu
Sean Coates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So, allow users to opt out of the "inactive" page.
Would that solve the problem?
I have a solution:
Simply remove the word "inactive" (and change the entities of course).
This way, people that are still active, but didn't make it to
So, allow users to opt out of the "inactive" page.
Would that solve the problem?
Or better word it so that it does not indicate that the listed people
are *completely* inactive currently.
Goba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So, allow users to opt out of the "inactive" page.
Would that solve the problem?
S
Sara Golemon wrote:
|>>Let me rephrase: I take exception to the adjective "inactive". It
|>>minimizes my efforts to bridge the gap between development and
|>>documentat
> > Let me rephrase: I take exception to the adjective "inactive". It
> > minimizes my efforts to bridge the gap between development and
> > documentation.
>
> Excuse me, but I don't undestand what you mean here.
>
I'll put it bluntly then: If I'm seen as inactive, then perhaps I should
just li
> > > I'm resisting the urge to move my name from "Inactive authors" to the
> main
> > > page. More curious what criteria was used to determine who's active
and
> who
> > > isn't.
> >
> > There was a limit on the *last half year* activity of people. I see
> > around 90 letters from you (including
There was a limit on the *last half year* activity of people. I see
around 90 letters from you (including CVS commits and bug actions) in my
local phpdoc mailbox (which contains letters for the complete last
year).
Yes fine, but what criteria was used to gague "activity"? I know it's not
raw numbe
> > I'm resisting the urge to move my name from "Inactive authors" to the
main
> > page. More curious what criteria was used to determine who's active and
who
> > isn't.
>
> There was a limit on the *last half year* activity of people. I see
> around 90 letters from you (including CVS commits and
I'm resisting the urge to move my name from "Inactive authors" to the main
page. More curious what criteria was used to determine who's active and who
isn't.
There was a limit on the *last half year* activity of people. I see
around 90 letters from you (including CVS commits and bug actions) in m
I'm resisting the urge to move my name from "Inactive authors" to the main
page. More curious what criteria was used to determine who's active and who
isn't.
-Sara
28 matches
Mail list logo
