On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:11:03PM +0100, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> Ack. So then, please add us some info on PHP <-> Apache2 versions
> compatibility so we can add the info to the docs. Or is it only
> Sascha who knows this (apache2 sapi author)?
Do the latest PHP version and the latest Apache2 versio
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:27:51AM +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best version yet" marketing
> > trick the Apache Group is advertising on their front page.
> > We can mention it to users, in the bug db etc. But officially documenting, that
> > A
I did more work and testing with fastcgi and apache 2, and have php 4.3
running under apache 2. Since it's out of process, no multithread
issues which are one of the major issues. I didn't write docs, but
there are some in sapi/cgi/README.fastcgi
Shane
As far as I can see, we should not not
> > >>I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the
> > documentation
> > >>about Apache 2 support.
> > >>
> > >> 1. It's not production ready
> >
> > > Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best version yet"
> > marketing
> > > trick the Apache Group is advertising
At 17:11 10/29/2002 +0100, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > > As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
> > documentation
> > > that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
> > production ready
> > > for Apache 2.
> >
> > But it's incorrect :). By saying "Do not use Apache 2 and PHP
> > > As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
> > documentation
> > > that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
> > production ready
> > > for Apache 2.
> >
> > But it's incorrect :). By saying "Do not use Apache 2 and PHP in a
> > production environment" you don't
Derick Rethans writes:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> > As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
> documentation
> > that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
> production ready
> > for Apache 2.
>
> But it's incorrect :). By saying "Do not use Apac
> > 1. It's not production ready
>
> Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best version yet"
marketing
> trick the Apache Group is advertising on their front page.
> We can mention it to users, in the bug db etc. But officially documenting,
that
> Apache 2 is really a beta product, do
At 11:30 10/29/2002 +0100, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
>>I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the
documentation
>>about Apache 2 support.
>>
>> 1. It's not production ready
> Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best version yet"
marketing
> trick the Apache Grou
Hallo Melvyn,
Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 9:55:31 AM, you wrote:
> At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>> > The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
>> > they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
>> > succeed. Is it really necessary to doc
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> >
> >I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the documentation
> >about Apache 2 support.
> >
> > 1. It's not production ready
>
> Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best
At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
> they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
> succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works
> only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.
>> The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
>> they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
>> succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works
>> only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.04x only with php4.2y1
>> or php4.2.y2
> The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
> they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
> succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works
> only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.04x only with php4.2y1
> or php4.2.y2? It s
|>> We receive many complaints at [EMAIL PROTECTED] about failures in
|>> setting up PHP with Apache 2. Can somebody please update the
|>> documentation with details on Apache 2 on Linux and Windows, or
|>> provide information for the documentation team to add to the
|>> documentation. It wou
|> We receive many complaints at [EMAIL PROTECTED] about failures in
|> setting up PHP with Apache 2. Can somebody please update the
|> documentation with details on Apache 2 on Linux and Windows, or
|> provide information for the documentation team to add to the
|> documentation. It would def
16 matches
Mail list logo
