On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:04 AM, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> Hi Hannes:
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:49:34AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>
>> I didn't even realize that built-in classes had private
>> properties/methods. Seems utterly useless to tell the end-user that.
>
> You're right. They
Hi Hannes:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:49:34AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> I didn't even realize that built-in classes had private
> properties/methods. Seems utterly useless to tell the end-user that.
You're right. They shouldn't be in the docs in the first place, even in
their original
On 29 April 2010 11:32, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 29 April 2010 11:12, Richard Quadling wrote:
>> On 29 April 2010 10:26, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:56, Richard Quadling
>>> wrote:
On 29 April 2010 09:49, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2
On 29 April 2010 10:26, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:56, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>> On 29 April 2010 09:49, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:27, Richard Quadling
>>> wrote:
On 29 April 2010 08:50, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 29 April 2010
On 29 April 2010 11:12, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 29 April 2010 10:26, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:56, Richard Quadling
>> wrote:
>>> On 29 April 2010 09:49, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:27, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> On 29 April
On 29 April 2010 10:26, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:56, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>> On 29 April 2010 09:49, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:27, Richard Quadling
>>> wrote:
On 29 April 2010 08:50, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 29 April 2010
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:56, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> On 29 April 2010 09:49, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:27, Richard Quadling
>> wrote:
>>> On 29 April 2010 08:50, Peter Cowburn wrote:
On 29 April 2010 08:18, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> Moments ago Yawk a
On 29 April 2010 09:49, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:27, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>> On 29 April 2010 08:50, Peter Cowburn wrote:
>>> On 29 April 2010 08:18, Philip Olson wrote:
Moments ago Yawk asked in IRC about why we list inherited methods but not
in
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:27, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> On 29 April 2010 08:50, Peter Cowburn wrote:
>> On 29 April 2010 08:18, Philip Olson wrote:
>>>
>>> Moments ago Yawk asked in IRC about why we list inherited methods but not
>>> inherited properties. Good question. So unless someone comes
On 29 April 2010 08:50, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 29 April 2010 08:18, Philip Olson wrote:
>>
>> Moments ago Yawk asked in IRC about why we list inherited methods but not
>> inherited properties. Good question. So unless someone comes up with a
>> reason, let's add them too. Okay? It can use th
On 29 April 2010 08:18, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> Moments ago Yawk asked in IRC about why we list inherited methods but not
> inherited properties. Good question. So unless someone comes up with a
> reason, let's add them too. Okay? It can use the same form of xpointer inside
> the classname.xml
Moments ago Yawk asked in IRC about why we list inherited methods but not
inherited properties. Good question. So unless someone comes up with a reason,
let's add them too. Okay? It can use the same form of xpointer inside the
classname.xml files.
Regards,
Philip
12 matches
Mail list logo
