Great point you've made about having one or more women on the committee,
Pam. Just back from a day out of home and submerged with mail, but I'll
catch up.
It seems your point about "members from around the world" is great also and
we'd like to hear from list members from Latin America and from
Aus
It also seems necessary to have lighter objects on a black background. The
opposite leads only to patterns of fog.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Sellers
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] something to take your mind off wwpd.
> Hi Bill,
>
>
Hi Bill,
On Sunday, February 25, 2001, you wrote:
> I uploaded a couple images as one, taken with the lid of a salt shaker.
> HTTP://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/salt-shaker.jpg.
> They don't have a lot of esthetic value but they are an example of results
> from a three dimensional mu
No problem. It sure is a good list.
Pam
James Kellar wrote:
>
> The list. Sorry if I did'nt make that point clear.
>
> James
>
> on 2/25/01 6:42 PM, Pam Niedermayer at pam_p...@cape.com wrote:
>
> > Do you mean the most work on and most interest in this event? Or this
> > list? Or pinhole pho
The list. Sorry if I did'nt make that point clear.
James
on 2/25/01 6:42 PM, Pam Niedermayer at pam_p...@cape.com wrote:
> Do you mean the most work on and most interest in this event? Or this
> list? Or pinhole photography in general?
>
> Pam
>
> James Kellar wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> ...
>> T
Do you mean the most work on and most interest in this event? Or this
list? Or pinhole photography in general?
Pam
James Kellar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> ...
> The names were picked by, who has done the most work and ho has shown the
> most interest.
>
> James
>
> __
Well to day was pretty interesting, if not a bit depressing. I was in
Indianpolis today shooting for latest printswap and boy was today windy. I
had just loaded my Zero 2000 with a fresh roll of film when a gust of wind
came along and blew off my hat. When I went to retrieve it, along came
another
Hi all,
I have been away from my computer for the better part of the day, so I'm
coming into this a bit late. I believe every thing as been said that I would
say, except thanks Pam coming foward and pointing this out. It was an issue
that I had thought about right before I e-mailed this message la
Great, certainly would make for an even more successful event. I think
it's great that there are members from around the world.
Pam
Larry Fratkin wrote:
>
> Hi Pam and rest,
> I would like to see as much diversity as we can get on the committee.
>
> Larry
>
--
Pamela G. Niedermayer
Pineh
Hi Pam and rest,
I would like to see as much diversity as we can get on the committee.
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Pam Niedermayer
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
List-Post: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
Date: Sunday, February 25, 2001 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion]
leezy - thanks. I don't want to speak for others but I feel sure you will
be contacted very soon to start working out the details of scanning places
around the globe.
- Gregg
At 01:33 PM 2/25/01 -0500, you wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/01 12:26:27 PM, pam_p...@cape.com writes:
<< Leezy, f
Actually, the makeup of the committee was not accidental. The people on
the steering committee were invited by James and myself and based on
several years of knowing their skills and contributions to the list. Both
James and I also wanted representation from around the globe. The current
abs
on 2/25/01 11:46 AM, William Erickson at erick...@ic.mankato.mn.us wrote:
> I second the request. I have been using a polaroid sprintscan 45 and scanning
> B&W negatives as color. It really seems to demand quite a flat negtative to
> capture what is in the negative. Also, a negative scanner doesn'
In a message dated 2/25/01 12:26:27 PM, pam_p...@cape.com writes:
<< Leezy, for example, has been quite active in getting this whole thing
started, in on it at the beginning. Perhaps, a big perhaps because I
don't really know what her desires are, she'd like to be asked. >>
I'm fine with everythi
I'm pretty new here, Michael; I'm so new to pinhole that I'm still in
the "making the camera/lens board" stage, have never taken a pinhole
photo; Austin, TX is very well represented by George Smyth; and I'm
not that fond of committee work. All of which is why I didn't respond
to the specific reques
Pam, are you volunteering to be on the steering committee? Or are you
waiting to volunteer for another committee?
I'm sure the makeup of the committee is entirely accidental, but a message
was sent asking for folks to volunteer. Obviously, many didn't.
Sorry, forget one thing.
Microtek also told me that the black liners for lining
up negatives that come with the Scanmaker 4 are for
neatness only. They save you the trouble of rotating
negatives in photoshop if you get them crooked, but
they say they make no difference to the quality of the
scan.
Thank you, Guillermo. The expressed support from committee members is
most appreciated.
Pam
"G.Penate" wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pam Niedermayer"
>
> > Seems to me there must be one or two women who belong on this
> > committee. Now this is just a supposition based on ro
I suspect that no one did; but that doesn't mean there isn't interest.
Leezy, for example, has been quite active in getting this whole thing
started, in on it at the beginning. Perhaps, a big perhaps because I
don't really know what her desires are, she'd like to be asked.
Pam
Jeff Dilcher wrote:
Hi
I have a Microtek Scanmaker 4 scanner as well and have
been quite pleased with my results scanning B&W
negatives. The trick seems to be to scan them as color
POSITIVES (the setting is called "positive
transparencies," not color negatives and then to
invert them. Microtek in Japan suggested thi
I second the request. I have been using a polaroid sprintscan 45 and
scanning B&W negatives as color. It really seems to demand quite a flat
negtative to capture what is in the negative. Also, a negative scanner
doesn't handle underexposed negatives at all well. With some images I've
made a print a
I did. Using just one hole, the image was more coherent, but still distorted
by the distortions in the shape of the hole. I tried just using the outer
ring of holes, but got nothing usable because at that point I didn't realize
how critical the excluding of unwanted light sources was. I downloaded
You should take a close look at VueScan at
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
VueScan is a great $40 program. Originally developed for film
scanners, it now works with flatbed scanners as well, including
Microtek. You can download a try before you buy.
With my Nikon LS-30/Coolscan III, VueSca
I wonder how many expressed an interest!
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Pam
Niedermayer
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 2:44 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion]
Thanks, Pam, for pointing out the slanted makeup of the WPPD Steering Commitee.
I am way too new
to this myself, but I'm sure there are some females on this list who have been
participating for a
while and who should be considered for inclusion on this committee.
--Diana
Message: 11
List-Post
I think there is more esthetic in the images that you're giving
yourself credit for. The images are striking for their doughnut
shapes arranged in intriguing and captivating forms. An excellent
idea and result. It looks like you've used every hole in the salt
shaker lid. Have you tried blocking
Does anyone know any good resources and/or tips
for scanning black and white film? A while back
I purchased a fairly decent scanner, (microtek
scanmaker 4), which has trays for scanning film.
I have been trying to scan 4x5 B&W negatives, but
seem to be having miserable results- way to much
contr
I uploaded a couple images as one, taken with the lid of a salt shaker.
HTTP://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/salt-shaker.jpg.
They don't have a lot of esthetic value but they are an example of results
from a three dimensional multiple pinhole array. The salt shaker lid is
somewhat dome-
- Original Message -
From: "Pam Niedermayer"
> Seems to me there must be one or two women who belong on this
> committee. Now this is just a supposition based on rough numbers, I'm
> too new to the group to know this for sure, certainly too new to know
> who they may be. But I think it's
Seems to me there must be one or two women who belong on this
committee. Now this is just a supposition based on rough numbers, I'm
too new to the group to know this for sure, certainly too new to know
who they may be. But I think it's worth the committee's consideration.
Pam
James Kellar wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a bit more inof on the steering committee.
The members of the committee are as follows:
Larry Fratkin, Guy Glorieux, Jean Daubas, Gregg Kemp, Zernike Au, Guillermo
Penate, George Smyth, James Kellar and Ed Levinson*
At this time we have noleader of this group, but I'm sure that
In case anyone is wondering, a steering group for the "pinhole day" has
definitely been formed and we are in the process of getting ourselves
organized. We will soon announce a "rough" structure to make this thing
really happen. One of the most important concerns has been to set things
up in
Natalie,
We'll need more information. What is the f-stop of you camera? or at
least the focal length? What is the ISO speed of the film you're
using. What kind of lighting conditions you want to shoot under.
Cheers,
Guy
Natalie Nadozirny wrote:
> Hi.I am experimenting with a new pinhole came
33 matches
Mail list logo