Hey, everybody!
While it would be nice to do an old-fashioned
travelling exhibition, I agree that using the web
would be much more democratic, especially if we could
get a variety of places(like galleries and such) to
enable this process by providing scanners, access to
the web, darkrooms, etc,
Jim, I dig your image, and, not to take away from it,
but isn't there an example of underwater pinhole in
Eric Renner's book, in a pond, I think? He used a
jar, I think.
Leslie(--fuzzy memory)
--- Kosinski Family zin...@telenet.net wrote:
Good news, and you're the first to see it!
The
Richard,
Is the resolution we see exactly what the scanner gave
you? Seems pretty low, too digital.
I loved #3. I'm into water and boats these days.
Leslie
--- Richard Heather rheat...@slonet.org wrote:
Hi. I just bought a UMAX 2200. It will sca 81/2x11
prints or up to 4x5
transparencies.
Guy, I really loved your pinholes. Many have such a
beautiful, painterly quality. I felt full of images
after just a few and will revisit to view some more
later. I especially loved number 14, very
impressionistic.
I had a slight problem with number 13, couldn't get it
to show me the right
I know that with my previous server and modem it was a
total pain in the arse to receive images in email,
REALLY slow and often my server would time me out and
I'd have to go in via Telnet to delete the offensive
email, never having seen what image was sent.
Thus, while it is not a problem for me
Dwight,
I forwarded that old message from Gregg about the site
he set up for us. No offense, just wanted you to know
of its existance. I started to look at your images
and have only looked at a couple yet. Do you live in
Ireland? The first one, Tralee, wasn't saturated in
green; was there a
