You will probably be out of luck on one-hour turnaround on medium or large
format.
You might find some pro-shop who can develop the film in a couple of hours,
but making prints would take a day or more.
Options:
1) Shoot slide film, and get the couple hour turnaround.
2) Get a polaroid back for
- Original Message -
From: ragowaring ragowar...@btinternet.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] 18 x24 pinhole/lens camera
I have an old DIY (Do It Yourself) Manual from the 1920's, I think, that
shows you
- Original Message -
From: Richard M. Koolish kool...@bbn.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Jeff Dilcher's photos - questions
What the heck is inverse quadratic diminution? Maybe I shouldn't ask!
I
- Original Message -
From: Colin Talcroft ctalcr...@yahoo.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 11:16 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] TEST
Sorry, List
I got six copies of my own message to the list
yesterday from the list server--bizarre.
I just
- Original Message -
From: John Yeo jonn...@thegrid.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Cheapie Pinholes, from Russia with love
I had one of those (lomo from freestyle) in my backpack for a while... and
the
OK, I got my roll back from this camera. Some of them were not what I
expected. I guess the overcast lighting went with low contrast instead
of richer color. My eye saw something else at the time, but doesn't it
always.
I put a few up on
From what I can tell, there was no set screw. There was a ring with slots
cut in to snag with a tool. I think this was on the front and the back.
I think the brass lens assembly is held to the plastic ring by screws
underneath the label that rings the lens.
- Original Message -
From:
Well, I got my little cheapie 35mm cameras yesterday from Freestyle. $12
each. I got two so I could rip up one. So, it just so happened that the
first one I opened had a problem with the shutter. It would cock, but not
fire. Maybe I manhandled it too hard before I read the directions, or
I wrote to Philip asking if he was having a problem with his mail and if
I
could help. I haven't gotten a reply, but noticed he continues to send
empty messages.
He's also sending blank msgs to the cameramakers list, also
How would I join the cameramakers list? Is that a newsgroup, or an
His messages to me directly are blank also.
- Original Message -
From: Gregg Kemp gregg.k...@sas.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] f stops
I wrote to Philip asking if he was having a problem with his mail
All of Phil's messages are blank. Just testing to see if mine will be.
- Original Message -
From: Philip Arny philip.a...@tpl.org
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] f stops
Just as a point of reference, if you're going for this look
Well, this is my first time attempting something like this. I suspect they
will all look the same pretty quickly and get boring. I can't see this one
hanging on the wall very long. But, I'm usually heavy into composition, so
its nice
I've just shot my first roll in my Zero 2000 6x6 camera. I screwed up by
thinking the takeup reel goes on the right (as you look from the back), just
like most other cameras. I ended up shooting a roll that was wound onto the
takeup reel with the film on the outside and the paper on the inside.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Peregoy pere...@gl.umbc.edu
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Zone Plate Focus stringency
TSHACK wrote:
very good. thanks.
That was going to be my reply
Mom, Chris
very good. thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Guillermo pen...@home.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Zone Plate Focus stringency
- Original Message -
From: TSHACK tsh...@silver-bayou.com
- Original Message -
From: Chris Peregoy pere...@gl.umbc.edu
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Zone Plate Focus stringency
Guillermo wrote:
Although I do not recommend focusing of the zoneplate every time you
A zone plate focusses like a lens so you should adjust the focus for
objects at different distances. On the other hand, they tend to have
large f numbers (like f/32) so they have large depth of field. They
are
also hard to focus because they are so dim.
I congratulate you
If it needs to refocused, my hacked TLR job is not going to work. I'll
either need an SLR, or my Crown Graphic. I hope not.
We'll see what happens.
Tonight I took my Zero Image 6x9, gripped it in place on the top of my car
by closing the moonroof on it, then drove around in traffic. I'll see
It seems like I read somewhere that an enlarger bellows is not robust enough
to keep out sunlight if used on a camera. I've got an old 4x5 enlarger that
I'm considering copping the bellows off of to build a camera.
Anyone know anything about this?
Dwight
Maybe you're asking something else, like what is the normal lens for 6x9
film. I think it would be the same length as a diagonal from one corner of
your film to the other. So, to calculate that you would take the square root
of (6x6 + 9x9) which is approximately 11cm or 110mm. I think
Ah, so you want a longer focal length so you minimize the distortion from
mapping the image onto a flat surface? You will only get a wide angle image
if you use a short focal length. If you use a longer focal length, the
distortion will be less as the area you are shooting will more
I'm hacking up an old TLR right now to put another shutter on it for zone
plate work, and I'm wondering, how critical is the focal length for
focusing. If I'm putting a 90mm zone plate on, but due to mechanical
impediments it has to mount at 95 mm, how much of a difference will this
make in the
Ok, its not a pinhole photo, yet, but I've put up a Holga photo if anyone
wants to see it:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pinholegallery/files/HolgaPhotos/shadowball.jp
g
I'm calling it Chi and my Shaadow
Dwight
I have the Epson 1200U and it was certainly a deal at $250 last year.
I guess it depends on how persnicketty you are about the final product. I
don't have any specs or experience with other transparency scanners.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Peregoy pere...@gl.umbc.edu
To:
- Original Message -
From: Bill Erickson erick...@hickorytech.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] minimum zone plate focal length?
As with all things pinhole, the rule is try it!' My understanding is that
What is the minimum zone plate focal length? Short enough to work on a
Holga?
dwight
I thought zone plates couldn't be made for that short of a focal length.
It's been a while since I've read up on those though.
Thanks for the info.
Dwight
- Original Message -
From: Chris Peregoy pere...@gl.umbc.edu
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 11:10
Do I remember someone saying Zero 2000 was making a zone plate camera?
And what is their website address? I can't find it on any searches.
Dwight
- Original Message -
From: Leslie Green leslie_gr...@yahoo.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole gallery on egroups
Dwight,
I forwarded that old message from Gregg about the site
he set up for us. No
- Original Message -
From: Mike Vande Bunt mike.vandeb...@mixcom.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole gallery on egroups
TSHACK wrote:
error.jpg.
I can assure you that on this image, I did
I don't know what it is that makes this list so collaborative,
understanding and tolerant, but I'd be more interested in keeping it like
this than in finding the reason.
Probably because we're already used to not being able to see what we're
shooting at, and don't get upset when things come
OK, I've loaded a few of my pinhole shots up on the
http://www.egroups.com/group/pinholegallery site.
Looking at them up there now, they don't really look any more out of the
ordinary than any other travelogue photos. I do love a pinhole sky
though. All that foreshortening, and everything tries
Hi folks,
Someone just recently wanted to see some images from my rollfilm back
pinhole camera, but I've got technical problems with my website, so I
decided to do something else.
I've just set up a website at the egroups.com website service called
pinholegallery.
To join, go to
mitered piece that allows you
to
slide the back in. Mine, I have to hold together with rubber bands. I
hope
you can post your resulting images sometime.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: TSHACK tsh...@silver-bayou.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Saturday, August 19
I had the same problem with the drop bed, which prompted me to build this
camera:
http://www.silver-bayou.com/pinhole/interest.htm
I've posted this on the list once or twice over the last couple of years, so
it won't be new to some people. I built it in '97.
Its VERY wide angle, no dropbed to
Here's a reply. Just want to know if I made it through the eye of the
needle.
- Original Message -
From: Gregg Kemp gregg.kemp@p at ???
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 3:25 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: [pinhole] Discussion list upgrade
Hi
36 matches
Mail list logo
