Murray writes:
>
> BUT, people are telling me I will probably be disappointed by anything
> larger than 5 x 7 or so from my 35 mm pinhole negatives because they say
> pinhole images are "not very sharp".
Actually, what they are telling you is that THEY will be disappointed by
anything larger than
Murray writes:
>
> BUT, people are telling me I will probably be disappointed by anything
> larger than 5 x 7 or so from my 35 mm pinhole negatives because they say
> pinhole images are "not very sharp".
>
> Is this just anecdotal advice from people who simply poked a hole without
> consideration
- Original Message -
From: "Gordon J. Holtslander"
> You are more or less correct, as you enlarge your image from a pinhole
> negative on 35 mm film you will be making the limited resolution of the
> image more apparent.
>
> If you want a really sharp 8x10 pinhole images the best way to p
Hi:
I _think_ this is what happens - knowledgeable people feel free to
correct me.
There are two things that limit the pinhole resolution:
I believe a pinhole image's - the negative - limit of resolution is the
size of the pinhole - The finest detail the image can create is the same
as the diame
..@aol.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:49 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] questions & comments
Hello:
Excuse me if I already asked this - if I did, I forgot the replies already
(but I don't think I did).
Oh, firstly, apologi
Murray wrote
>>> BUT, people are telling me I will probably be disappointed by
anything
larger than 5 x 7 or so from my 35 mm pinhole negatives because they say
pinhole images are "not very sharp". <<<
Murry,
My favorite pinhole camera is a large popcorn tin. It uses 11x14 photo
Hello:
Excuse me if I already asked this - if I did, I forgot the replies already
(but I don't think I did).
Oh, firstly, apologies for the html forwarding garbage characters...I don't
think AOL software lets one too picky about how they do things.
I am a little confused, perhaps only by my expe
