Re: Including LayerShellQt in Plasma in time for 5.22

El dijous, 1 d’abril de 2021, a les 19:12:30 CEST, Aleix Pol va escriure: > Hi, > In Plasma we have wanted a way to work with wlr_layer_shell for a > while, I'd tried taking this weird route, where we were adding it into > the project ad hoc, but it didn't really go anywhere. >

Re: Including LayerShellQt in Plasma in time for 5.22

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 7:12 PM Aleix Pol wrote: > > Hi, > In Plasma we have wanted a way to work with wlr_layer_shell for a > while, I'd tried taking this weird route, where we were adding it into > the project ad hoc, but it didn't really go anywhere. >

Re: Monday meeting notes for 29/03/2021

Notes from KF6 spint: Theme -> replace with Kirigami::Theme? Units -> raplace with Kirigami::Units IconItem: can be replaced with Kirigami::Icon? (big missing one is icons from plasma theme) Yes please to all three. platformcomponents -> die plasmastyle-> qqc1

Re: Application Launcher redesign in latest kde version

Hi, >I find the last layout changes in the application launcher a serious regression in usability. It is impossible to please everyone unfortunately. But for sure we let the users decide in the end what's best for them. > Could there be an option to have the old layout? Indeed there is, you

Re: “Application Launcher 2.0” - New (simple) Feature Request

On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 10:35 +0100, Marco Uguccioni wrote: > Dear Mr. Martin Graesslin & Mr. Mikel Johnson, > > I am writing you to kindly request a new feature  > in the new version of the Kickoff Menu which will be released with Plasma 5.21 > Stable: Should this suggestion go to a bugtracker

Re: Re-purposing KWaylandServer

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:44 AM Vlad Zahorodnii wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently, KWaylandServer library is a collection of convenience Qt > wrappers around Wayland protocols. The issue with such a design is that > the bulk of work needs to be still done in the compositor, for example > it still

Re-purposing KWaylandServer

Hi, Currently, KWaylandServer library is a collection of convenience Qt wrappers around Wayland protocols. The issue with such a design is that the bulk of work needs to be still done in the compositor, for example it still needs to deal with importing client buffers, setting up the session,

Re: Plasma 5.21.3

I've an updated libksysguard which adds an important bug fix libksysguard;Plasma/5.21;cf77c8ceddfdd098be46ee63c9be4405659f8e45;libksysguard-5.21.3.1.tar.xz;e370db775b575106f9d228596d3aa0da3ba568da9c2cf76de6e1d8ab60945e59 On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 13:29, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Plasma 5.21.3 is

Re: Has there ever been ...

Nate Graham wrote: > That version is over two years old and is not maintained. Can you maybe On an unrelated note: does the feature to raise and activate a window by scrolling the mousewheel (or doing a 2-finger scroll) still only work on inactive windows - and thus nothing if you use

Re: Has there ever been ...

René J. V. Bertin wrote: > René J. V. Bertin wrote: > > The scrollbar arrows are also not drawn correctly, > the bottom one seems clipped. This particular symptom was due to the Oxygen win-deco theme setting to add a resize handle to borderless windows. I hadn't noticed the handle due to my

Re: Has there ever been ...

Nate Graham wrote: > That version is over two years old and is not maintained. Can you maybe > build the latest version from source? As I said, not easily: too many dependencies that need to be updated, including Qt. Too much work (not to mention, time) for a result I'm just not certain about.

Re: Has there ever been ...

On 3/14/21 11:29 AM, René J. V. Bertin wrote: Nate Graham wrote: What version? 5.15.5 . As mentioned before, I cannot update to a more recent version easily on this system. That version is over two years old and is not maintained. Can you maybe build the latest version from source?

Re: Has there ever been ...

Nate Graham wrote: > What version? 5.15.5 . As mentioned before, I cannot update to a more recent version easily on this system.

Re: Has there ever been ...

On 3/14/21 7:09 AM, René J. V. Bertin wrote: After a while (possibly after using the Tigervnc x0vncserver) I get an updating issue in one of my Konsole windows. It's maximised vertically (doesn't matter if via the corresponding wm function or actually resized manually), and the bottom line tends

Re: Has there ever been ...

René J. V. Bertin wrote: > Update: using OpenGL 2 seems to have cured the glitching I have been > experiencing, apart from the occasional lack of immediate updating of a region > (like just now when I opened the KWin prefs dialog via the titlebar context > menu, which remained partly visible). >

Re: Has there ever been ...

René J. V. Bertin wrote: > Marco Martin wrote: > >> It doesn't and it never has. (transparecies and shadows without compositing) > ... > I see that KWin5 also has XRender support; I'll check if that or "lowly" > OpenGL 2.0 are suitable workarounds for me. Update: using OpenGL 2 seems to have

Re: Application Launcher 2.0

Hello Alan, I'm sorry you don't like the new one. Feel free to file bug reports (constructive criticism only, please). Additionally, you can download the old one from store.kde.org. You can find it by searching for "Legacy Kickoff" Nate On 3/1/21 12:31 AM, Alan Casson wrote: The new

Re: KDE CI: Plasma » kinfocenter » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 93 - Failure!

See https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kinfocenter/-/merge_requests/24 On 3/4/21 12:25 PM, CI System wrote: *BUILD FAILURE* Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/kinfocenter/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/93/

Re: Fwd: Consistent CMake requirements in Plasma

Moin, Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2021, 14:40:08 CET schrieb Nicolas Fella: > Hi packagers, > > I recently proposed to formalize that Plasma depends on CMake 3.16. The > reasoning is to 1) make the requirements consistent across Plasma repos > and 2) enable the use of modern CMake features. If

Re: Fwd: Consistent CMake requirements in Plasma

Hi Nicolas, > Is there any distro that does not ship at least CMake 3.16 interested in > shipping future Plasma releases? Debian/stable has 3.13, but the next stable release to sooner or later (we are already in freeze) will have >= 3.18, so from the Debian side you are free to push! Best

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Notes

On Wednesday, 10 March 2021 14:24:02 CET Marco Martin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 1:57 PM Carl Schwan wrote: > > qqc2-desktop-style has the advantage of using in a few places the QStyle > > so some controls are looking native but in an usual Kirigami application > > many other components are

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Notes

On Wednesday, 10 March 2021 13:57:31 CET Carl Schwan wrote: > Le mercredi, mars 10, 2021 10:56 AM, Marco Martin a écrit: > > I knew from a long time it was to be the default style on plamo.. I > > never really agreed to default to it on plasma mobile but since looked > > like it was the majority

Re: qqc2-breeze-style

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:09 PM Nate Graham wrote: > > People go off an do their own thing in an un-coordinated manner when > there is a significant problem that's not being solved, that problem has > existed for a while without being addressed, and there is no clear > direction or centrally

Re: qqc2-breeze-style

People go off an do their own thing in an un-coordinated manner when there is a significant problem that's not being solved, that problem has existed for a while without being addressed, and there is no clear direction or centrally coordinated plan for solving it. The way to prevent the

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Notes

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 1:57 PM Carl Schwan wrote: > > qqc2-desktop-style has the advantage of using in a few places the QStyle > so some controls are looking native but in an usual Kirigami application > many other components are looking the same as Breeze. You are for example > still getting

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Notes

Le mercredi, mars 10, 2021 10:56 AM, Marco Martin a écrit: > I knew from a long time it was to be the default style on plamo.. I > never really agreed to default to it on plasma mobile but since looked > like it was the majority decision i didn't oppose it too much (even > qqc2-desktop-style

Re: qqc2-breeze-style

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:50 PM Bhushan Shah wrote: > few thousand mobile devices with Plasma Mobile to end-users and > performance shown by Plasma qqc2 theme was simply not acceptable, we > even performed several benchmarks on all styles including desktop style > and Plasma theme and

Re: Has there ever been ...

Hi, I don't think we consider running KWin instead of Quartz Compositor a supported usecase, maybe that's where your glitches are coming from. /scnr > because kwin has been becoming more and more bloated over the versions leading up to 5.15, and filled with functionality I don't need. Can

Re: Has there ever been ...

Marco Martin wrote: > It doesn't and it never has. (transparecies and shadows without compositing) OK, I made a shortcut, sorry for that. Transparency and shadows do work with XRender compositing so I suppose I should have talked about "OpenGL compositing". I see that KWin5 also has XRender

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Notes

> The fact that things like that are needed to keep the VDG kids > excited, is *not* an argument, we really cannot compromise the > quality for the sake of that. I have to explain myself better I don't mean "vdg kids" in any derogatory way whatsoever: the thing is that there are many young people

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Notes

I knew from a long time it was to be the default style on plamo.. I never really agreed to default to it on plasma mobile but since looked like it was the majority decision i didn't oppose it too much (even qqc2-desktop-style would be fine on plamo for now, there may have been issues with using

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Notes

Thank you for your opinion Marco. Am Mittwoch, 10. März 2021, 09:30:35 CET schrieb Marco Martin: > wasn't present at the kickoff meeting so commenting just here, just now. > I'm quite against qqc2-breeze-style and i think it was a mistake. > It was that the style used in plasma-mobile had bugs,

Re: qqc2-breeze-style should use bugs.kde.org for bug tracking

I felt that thing sneaked in release and was very disappointed about that. so if it really must exist (and is asking for troubles on so many fronts) it should at least be forced to use bugs.kde.org On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:07 PM David Redondo wrote: > > Hi, > > I think when the gitlab migration

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Notes

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 7:22 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Jonathan, David E, Arjen, Noah, Carl, David R, Kai Uwe, Nate, Neal Gompa, > Nicofee, Aleix, Rik Mills, Sitter, Alexander L > > = Plasma 5.22 kickoff meeting = > > == 5.21 review == > > Feature freeze followed, not too much last minute

Re: Has there ever been ...

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:56 PM René J.V. Bertin wrote: > 2) it supports the few effects I find crucial (transparency during > move/resize; *shadows*) even without compositing It doesn't and it never has. (transparecies and shadows without compositing) -- Marco Martin

Re: Has there ever been ...

, it's your opinion, and framing it as a truth also feels insulting. KWin works fine for me, especially with the recent compositing re-work in Plasma 5.21. Everything is now buttery smooth. If it works less well for you, the solution is to file bug reports or get involved in the project to fix

Re: Has there ever been ...

Jonathan Riddell wrote: > This is pretty insulting, it would be better not to continue with this > thread. > Hah, well, I suppose the truth can hurt but I didn't think I I was writing anything that anyone would take personally. I didn't and don't lay any blame - but I do know I'm not the 1st,

Re: Has there ever been ...

This is pretty insulting, it would be better not to continue with this thread. Jonathan On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 11:56, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > Has there ever been a KWin version that was just (or predominatly) a > straight port of the latest KWin4 to Qt5 and KF5? > > Lately I find

Re: KDE CI: Plasma » plasma-phone-components » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 209 - Failure!

I imagine it needs to see the new kwin? Do we need to trigger something? On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:56 PM CI System wrote: > *BUILD FAILURE* > Build URL > https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/plasma-phone-components/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/209/ > Project: kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 > Date of build: Thu,

Re: Consistent CMake requirements in Plasma

Hi, I have now bumped the requirement for all Plasma repos. There was one resulting build failure in kinfocenter that has been corrected. Let me know if you notice any other unusual behavior. Cheers Nico On 3/1/21 12:30 PM, Nicolas Fella wrote: Hi, so far I haven't received any negative

Re: KDE CI: Plasma » kwin » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 826 - Still Failing!

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:41 PM Vlad Zahorodnii wrote: > > On 3/2/21 2:23 PM, Aleix Pol wrote: > > I saw. My patch was removing it though and it didn't fail on my > > system. Maybe it's a different behaviour between gcc and clang. I > > could try that... > > Another option is to try to remove

Re: KDE CI: Plasma » kwin » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 826 - Still Failing!

On 3/2/21 2:23 PM, Aleix Pol wrote: I saw. My patch was removing it though and it didn't fail on my system. Maybe it's a different behaviour between gcc and clang. I could try that... Another option is to try to remove #include "keyboard_input.h" in wayland_server.h somehow. As far as I can

Re: KDE CI: Plasma » kwin » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 826 - Still Failing!

I saw. My patch was removing it though and it didn't fail on my system. Maybe it's a different behaviour between gcc and clang. I could try that... On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:40 AM Vlad Zahorodnii wrote: > > On 3/2/21 3:15 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > > Just reverted my own commit. > >

Re: KDE CI: Plasma » kwin » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 826 - Still Failing!

On 3/2/21 3:15 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: Just reverted my own commit. https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/commit/b409f523f01cad45c9b1f4068ffc9fcf9a72399b I cannot reproduce locally and we better keep a working

Re: KDE CI: Plasma » kwin » kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.15 - Build # 826 - Still Failing!

Just reverted my own commit. https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/commit/b409f523f01cad45c9b1f4068ffc9fcf9a72399b I cannot reproduce locally and we better keep a working build I guess. On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:44 AM CI System wrote: > *BUILD FAILURE* > Build URL >

Re: Consistent CMake requirements in Plasma

Hi, so far I haven't received any negative feedback on this and got acknowledgements from Debian, Fedora and OpenSUSE. Unless someone objects within the next 24 hours I suggest that we proceed with this. Cheers Nico On 2/9/21 7:32 PM, Nicolas Fella wrote: Hi, while I was doing some cmake

Re: releaseme license clarifications

I am fine with this.

Re: releaseme license clarifications

El dc., 24 de febr. 2021, 13:29, Harald Sitter va escriure: > Yo! > > If you are in the CC list please respond whether you are ok with the > licenses or not. > > I'm in the process of moving releaseme to reuse compliance and need > y'all to approve the following clarifications on the plasma

Re: releaseme license clarifications

I am fine with this On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 01:29:28PM +0100, Harald Sitter wrote: > Yo! > > If you are in the CC list please respond whether you are ok with the > licenses or not. > > I'm in the process of moving releaseme to reuse compliance and need > y'all to approve the following

Re: releaseme license clarifications

I'm fine with it Original Message On 24 Feb 2021, 1:29 PM, Harald Sitter wrote: > Yo! If you are in the CC list please respond whether you are ok with the > licenses or not. I'm in the process of moving releaseme to reuse compliance > and need y'all to approve the following

Re: releaseme license clarifications

I'm happy with this for my works yes Jonathan On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 12:29, Harald Sitter wrote: > Yo! > > If you are in the CC list please respond whether you are ok with the > licenses or not. > > I'm in the process of moving releaseme to reuse compliance and need > y'all to approve the

Re: 5.22 Kickoff Meeting in an hour!

https://meet.kde.org/b/jon-qyr-v3g On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 15:00, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Meeting in an hour! I'll sent round a meet.kde.org URL then > > Jonathan > > >

Re: Using your Qt layer shell code

+1

Re: Application Launcher 2.0

Check out the Legacy Kickoff extension on the KDE store. https://store.kde.org/p/1468103/ On Mon, 22 Feb, 2021, 18:51 Matthias Pauschel, wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for making KDE-neon, it's amazing! > > Recent *Application Launcher 2.0* however is awful, can you please > provide settings to

Re: Request on the Kickoff replacement

Hi David, > The KickOff replacement is a big change. I adapted to KickOff and now I > have to adapt to the new one. Just a small note - you don't have to - the old one is now on store.kde.org as Legacy Kickoff [1] Cheers, Ivan [1] https://store.kde.org/p/1468103/ -- dr Ivan Čukić

Re: Request on the Kickoff replacement

Hello Temet, I'm glad you're enjoying our software! Regarding the new Kickoff, can you please file a bug report at https://bugs.kde.org on "Plasmashell | Application Launcher (Kickoff)"? Thanks! Nate On 2/19/21 9:43 AM, Temet wrote: Hello Plasma Teams, Thanks for your hard work guys.

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Meeting

unfortunately i can't make it :(, i'll read notes On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:22 AM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Tuesday 23 Feb 2021 16:00GMT (17:00CET) seems popular, let's have a kickoff > meeting then. > > We'll discuss the schedule for Plasma releases for 2021, what new stuff might > come

Re: Plasma 5.22 Kickoff Meeting

Tuesday 23 Feb 2021 16:00GMT (17:00CET) seems popular, let's have a kickoff meeting then. We'll discuss the schedule for Plasma releases for 2021, what new stuff might come from the VDG, issues with 5.21, what new features we want in 5.22. Jonathan On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 15:10, Jonathan

Re: Plasma 5.21.0

Congratulations on a huge achievement, everyone! This Plasma release is the product of tons and tons of work by tons and tons of people, and it's already getting rave reviews from users. I think we hit this one out of the park. Well done! Nate On 2/16/21 6:08 AM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:

Re: Plasma 5.21.0

Plasma 5.21.0 is now released, correct page is https://kde.org/announcements/plasma/5/5.21.0/ On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 12:56, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Plasma 5.21.0 is now released https://kde.org/announcements/plasma-5.21.0 > >

Re: Monday meeting notes for 15/2/2021

On 2/15/21 4:54 AM, Marco Martin wrote: Fabian [...] * openQA for 5.21.0 is at this point almost green, but there are two remaining issues: 1. In the wayland session, sometimes pressing "enter" in dolphin opens the "new folder" dialog instead of entering a folder I have absolutely no idea

Re: Plasma 5.21 tar updates

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:42:53PM +, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > http://embra.edinburghlinux.co.uk/~jr/tmp/ > plasma-desktop-5.21.0-changes_report.html > http://embra.edinburghlinux.co.uk/~jr/tmp/ksysguard-5.21.0-changes_report.html >

Re: Plasma 5.21.0 tars available

Hi, so far everything is looking good on OpenMandriva - except one thing: the default seems to be keyboard repeat disabled. That's unexpected at the very least, and breaks some things badly (scrolling by holding down arrow keys?) I'd expect this to be more of an accessibility feature for a few

Re: About KDE Modern Menu Launcher

Hello Станислав, If you don't like the new one, the old version is available for download at https://store.kde.org/p/1468103/. Nate On 2/8/21 6:32 PM, Станислав Геннадьевич wrote: Hello developers! I use KDE Neon almost 4 years. I love old launcher style. Please add ability of setup of

Re: Plasma 5.21.0 tars available

Should be fixed in https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-desktop/-/commit/4e80d3ee426b11f4f9811849b5a97ae799bd7603. Yes, we will need to re-spin the tars for this to ensure no regressions for the public release. Nate On 2/14/21 6:01 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Hi, so far everything

Re: Consistent CMake requirements in Plasma

> Thoughts? If in doubt about distro requirements kde-distro-packagers is the best mailing list. Anything we can say will be just guessing. David

Re: Consistent CMake requirements in Plasma

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:32 PM Nicolas Fella wrote: > > Hi, > > while I was doing some cmake cleanup in Plasma I noticed that our stated > minimum cmake versions are both somewhat inconsistent and super old. > Most Plasma projects state that either 2.8 (released in 2009) or 3.0 > (released in

Re: Consistent CMake requirements in Plasma

On 2/9/21 8:32 PM, Nicolas Fella wrote: Hi, while I was doing some cmake cleanup in Plasma I noticed that our stated minimum cmake versions are both somewhat inconsistent and super old. Most Plasma projects state that either 2.8 (released in 2009) or 3.0 (released in 2014) are the minimum.

Re: Consistent CMake requirements in Plasma

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:32 PM Nicolas Fella wrote: > > Hi, > > while I was doing some cmake cleanup in Plasma I noticed that our stated > minimum cmake versions are both somewhat inconsistent and super old. > Most Plasma projects state that either 2.8 (released in 2009) or 3.0 > (released in

Re: Plasma-Wayland-Fedora 33

Hello Greg, Please file bug reports using https://bugs.kde.org. Here's the relevant documentation: https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Issue_Reporting Nate On 1/7/21 4:12 PM, Gregory Pittman wrote: I'm seeing some issues with running plasma on Wayland in Fedora 33. One is a message of a

Re: Synchronized release schedule for Plasma

Hi, sorry to bring this up again, but I would be in favor of a switching to 2 releases every year. I'd like to add some reasons to do that on the promotional side: 1) In Promo, we are quite stepping up our game in the quality of announcements, to both the website and the release video. We are

Re: Relicensing Plasma Browser Integration Host to GPLv3+

Fine by me too. Kind regards, Matthijs Tijink Op wo jan 6 2021, om 13:21 schreef Laurent Montel: > Hi, > > Fine for me > > Regards > > Le mardi 5 janvier 2021, 23:29:38 CET Kai Uwe Broulik a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > I've noticed that the licensing of Plasma Browser Integration is all >

Re: Relicensing Plasma Browser Integration Host to GPLv3+

Hi, Am Dienstag, 5. Januar 2021, 23:29:38 CET schrieb Kai Uwe Broulik: > I've noticed that the licensing of Plasma Browser Integration is all > over the place, some parts seem to be resembling an MIT-style license, > probably carried over all the way from when it was just a proof of > concept we

Re: Relicensing Plasma Browser Integration Host to GPLv3+

Moin, Am Dienstag, 5. Januar 2021, 23:29:38 CET schrieb Kai Uwe Broulik: > Hi all, > > I've noticed that the licensing of Plasma Browser Integration is all > over the place, some parts seem to be resembling an MIT-style license, > probably carried over all the way from when it was just a proof

Re: theming questions

Hi Marco, Yes, you are correct, this is for Subsurface-mobile. We do in fact use mostly our own controls and simply style them directly, but it is the odds and ends that we get from Kirigami that cause us problems, or more correctly, inconsistencies. E.g., I couldn't figure out a way to change

Re: theming questions

On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 12:20 AM Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > After spending some quality time with the documentation I could find (not a > lot) and with the sample plugin that I was able to find (Noah’s > qqc2-breeze-plugin) I’m not sure if I understand more or am more confused. :-) > > I was able

Re: theming questions

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 8:06 PM Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > Hi there and happy holidays > > I'm trying to improve the theming of my Kirigami-based app. We started using > Kirigami about 5 years ago (before the current Theme code was there) and have > done a lot of rather brute force things along

Re: monday meeting notes for 11/1/2021

On 1/11/21 5:13 AM, Marco Martin wrote: David E [...] * I've been trying to go over the plasma "Very high priority bugs" * I've fixed a few the last few weeks Thank you very much David for following up on these. I'd like to encourage other Plasma and KWin people to join in. We're down to

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

>Ping. https://invent.kde.org/plasma/sddm-kcm/-/merge_requests/3 is ready to merge now. Can we have that exception? Yes, no-one objected, so go ahead. David

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

On 1/7/21 4:27 PM, Nate Graham wrote: Hello! I'd like to request an exception for https://invent.kde.org/plasma/sddm-kcm/-/merge_requests/3. It's 99% finished and just needs a few minor bugs fixed before merging. Hopefully it should be merge-able within a week (hopefully sooner than that).

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

Hello! I'd like to request an exception for https://invent.kde.org/plasma/sddm-kcm/-/merge_requests/3. It's 99% finished and just needs a few minor bugs fixed before merging. Hopefully it should be merge-able within a week (hopefully sooner than than). Nate On 1/7/21 8:34 AM, Jonathan

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

On Tuesday, 5 January 2021 17:35:49 CET Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I propose to exclude ksysguard from 5.21 and do a standalone release > alongside it Since we still need ksysguard for the daemon and we're a bit too close to beta for major changes, I want to propose releasing both for 5.21, then

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

Today is repo and feature freeze I'll add in the three new repos if they pass kdereview: plasma-systemmonitor (all good), plasma-firewall and qqc2-breeze-style. I'll declare plasma-phone-components to be stable and ready for use. Please don't add notable new features without discussion. Beta is

Re: Synchronized release schedule for Plasma

ns with most users, as said before. Cheers, Carl > Thanks, > Niccolò > > p.s.: my mail could be arriving with a big delay and duplicated; if so, I'm > sorry, I did some confusion with my different email addresses. > > From "Plasma-devel" plasma-devel-boun...@kde.org >

Re: Synchronized release schedule for Plasma

;plasma-devel" mailto:plasma-devel@kde.org Cc mailto:kde-de...@kde.org Date Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:01:29 + Subject Re: Synchronized release schedule for Plasma We discussed this in the Plasma meeting on Monday and I'm afraid there's little appetite in moving to a 6 monthly release or

Re: Is it time to fork qtwaylandscanner?

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 12:26 PM David Edmundson wrote: > > I no longer have my initial objections. Especially as it is only a few > hundred lines. > We can solve the global_remove problem too. > > For now I would say let's build it inside kwayland-server as a purely > internal tool and not

Re: Synchronized release schedule for Plasma

e-de...@kde.org Date Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:01:29 + Subject Re: Synchronized release schedule for Plasma We discussed this in the Plasma meeting on Monday and I'm afraid there's little appetite in moving to a 6 monthly release or a 3 monthly release. We did used to have a 3 monthly schedu

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 13:23:47 CET Jonathan Riddell wrote: > So should plasma-systemmonitor packages depend on ksysguard packages for > ksystemstats ? Hmm, I suppose it should yes, since it can't run without ksystemstats. > > Jonathan > > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 12:18, Arjen Hiemstra

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

So should plasma-systemmonitor packages depend on ksysguard packages for ksystemstats ? Jonathan On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 12:18, Arjen Hiemstra wrote: > > On Tuesday, 5 January 2021 17:35:49 CET Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > I propose to exclude ksysguard from 5.21 and do a standalone release > >

Re: Relicensing Plasma Browser Integration Host to GPLv3+

Hi, Fine for me Regards Le mardi 5 janvier 2021, 23:29:38 CET Kai Uwe Broulik a écrit : > Hi all, > > I've noticed that the licensing of Plasma Browser Integration is all > over the place, some parts seem to be resembling an MIT-style license, > probably carried over all the way from when it

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

On Tuesday, 5 January 2021 17:35:49 CET Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I propose to exclude ksysguard from 5.21 and do a standalone release > alongside it We still need the ksysguard repo as it contains the ksystemstats daemon and all its plugins. We could disable building ksysguard GUI but that may

Re: Relicensing Plasma Browser Integration Host to GPLv3+

I am fine with anything.

Re: Is it time to fork qtwaylandscanner?

I no longer have my initial objections. Especially as it is only a few hundred lines. We can solve the global_remove problem too. For now I would say let's build it inside kwayland-server as a purely internal tool and not install the binary. It makes life easier. David

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 5:15 AM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Git repos I have for inclusion in 5.21, wdiff compared to 5.20: > > bluedevil breeze breeze-grub breeze-gtk breeze-plymouth discover drkonqi > kactivitymanagerd kde-cli-tools kde-gtk-config kdecoration kdeplasma-addons > kgamma5 khotkeys

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

> Noah is qqc2-breeze-style to be included? It has not yet passed kdereview. If it has not passed kdereview we shouldn't be including it, sorry. I believe the intended first target is plasma-mobile, so we have the option of making separate beta tarball outside the release schedule that could

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

I propose to exclude ksysguard from 5.21 and do a standalone release alongside it libksysguard would still be included as a dependency of plasma-systemmonitor Jonathan On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 16:15, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Git repos I have for inclusion in 5.21, wdiff compared to 5.20: > >

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

Git repos I have for inclusion in 5.21, wdiff compared to 5.20: bluedevil breeze breeze-grub breeze-gtk breeze-plymouth discover drkonqi kactivitymanagerd kde-cli-tools kde-gtk-config kdecoration kdeplasma-addons kgamma5 khotkeys kinfocenter kmenuedit kscreen kscreenlocker ksshaskpass ksysguard

Re: theming questions

Sending the email below on Dec 25th likely guaranteed that no one would respond. :-/ I apologize for replying to my own message, but this is a topic that's rather significant for my project and I'd love to find a way to make this all work. If there's a different mailing list I should use,

Re: Plasma 5.21 repo and soft feature freeze

https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kscreenlocker/-/merge_requests/12 (needs technical discussion) https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/merge_requests/134 (needs review) https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-desktop/-/merge_requests/142 (needs review and maybe merge)

Re: Plasma Framework and Kirigami unittests

One down: https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kirigami/-/merge_requests/200

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >