On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:36:48AM +0100, patrys wrote:
Author: patrys Date: Thu Nov 12 10:36:48 2009 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- explicitly disable gtk test
why?
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
was failing on missing python-mx-DateTime-devel headers.
look, instead of discussing the thing, you are again starting stupid commit war.
could you calm down a bit and think what are you doing, mate?
regards,
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
___
pld
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 05:33:43PM +0200, baggins wrote:
Author: baggins Date: Thu Jul 2 15:33:43 2009 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- rel 1
- looks good to me, blame radek and wrobell if something is broken
well, it builds
long...
any examples... even if there is one or two, then usually they are short if
i reckon well
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
swine flu killer next time, so spam filters pick it up? ;)
beside that, it is better now. thanks!
regards,
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel
i have upgraded postgresql to version 8.4 beta 1 on DEVEL branch.
it builds on th builders (test build only, if i understand arekm well,
don't expect beta of postgresql in th) and seems to work on my machine.
postgis, psycopg2 will follow on DEVEL branch in few days, i hope.
enjoy.
wrobell
be run standalone using embedded winstone http server,
i would suggest putting tomcat related stuff into separate subpackage
regards,
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:34:13PM +0100, Paweł Zuzelski wrote:
On Monday 26 of January 2009 20:22:38 wrobell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:05:21AM +0100, pawelz wrote:
Author: pawelz Date: Mon Jan 26 09:05:21 2009 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:52:40PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Friday 23 January 2009 02:30:52 wrobell wrote:
but i do care. i really want to know why i am supposed to maintain some
support for obsolete software on HEAD. my only conclusion is - AC line.
what support? you don't have
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 07:18:57AM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:10:57AM +0100, wrobell wrote:
Author: wrobell Date: Thu Jan 22 01:10:57 2009 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- python 2.4 is only in AC line
Patryk Zawadzki writes:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:49 AM, wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 07:18:57AM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
Why mess? This is exact condition.
If some day Ac goes to python 2.5 (unlikely, but...), such distro-line
conditions will need
Radoslaw Zielinski writes:
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org [22-01-2009 02:43]:
[...]
i changed my mind. AC bcond is used. hope that's ok and it won't invoke any
fucking cvs commit war.
That's what branches are for. Creating mess in specs for a decaying
distro line doesn't sound like
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:48:41AM +, wrobell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 06:19:19PM +, wrobell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:49:35AM +0100, matkor wrote:
Author: matkor Date: Fri Dec 19 08:49:34 2008 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
be regenerated for you. for sure people are using
300dpi, 600dpi, but... you never know :)
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
by all users. The idea, that its owner/group is
'texmf', and some files of texlive has sgid, doesn't work, because it
calls 'mkdir', 'cp'.
What should I do?
that was solved in tetex.spec, isn't it? /var/cache/fonts has sticky bit if
i reckon well.
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
) [0xb7cf46ee]
Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11. Server aborting
Full log: http://radek.cc/Xorg.0.log
which version of kernel?
regards,
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 04:36:55PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 12:48:41 wrobell wrote:
- if distro line bconds (whatever you call it) are allowed on HEAD,
forbidding it, is like forbidding commits to SPECS module, i'll continue add
them if i find it better than
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 04:34:52PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Monday 22 December 2008 20:43:48 wrobell wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
bcond in xulrunner.spec?
I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some
simple configure
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 02:04:39PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of
ac bcond in xulrunner.spec?
I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or
some simple
regards,
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
bcond in xulrunner.spec?
best regards,
wrobell wrob...@pld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac
bcond in xulrunner.spec?
I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some
simple configure
usage[2] savings, so it is worth the effort.
for example, tetex-*context* packages, which i don't use, are over 38MB in
size (to download).
if you know that adding some subpackage will save several MB in size, then
why not. otherwise i would not bother.
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 05:19:41PM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Dec 6, 2008, at 4:41 PM, wrobell wrote:
[1] my asus eee pc has 4GB of storage, so don't event try to tell me
that
sdd space is cheap
[2] i am accessing internet via 3G, so please don't tell me that
bandwith
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 06:05:57PM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Dec 6, 2008, at 5:35 PM, wrobell wrote:
But points noted fer sure, TeX is not easy packaging, never has been.
indeed :)
Note I dinna say either of
(Diskspace|bandwidth) is cheap.
Being stoopid is way more costly
it.
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
: python-modules = 2.5 2.6
(assuming that you python 2.5 is installed)
who changed that and why... i have no idea. having the pyrequires_eq macro
in current state is pointless.
see
cvs log rpm-macros.python
cvs up -r 1.4 rpm-macros.python
[...]
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
i have just installed th pld linux on asus eee pc 701.
if anybody wants to share some experiences, then...
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman
not applications?
i mean tomcat, jAlbum won't be named as java-apache-tomcat, java-jAlbum,
java-gallery-remote.. ?
only libs like in case of python, i.e. python-psycopg2 (lib) but gaphor (an
app).
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing
patch solving lack of .py files was
applied against sources of given project.
[...]
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
is not sent to project maintainers. this
way we need to perform more work while upgrading packages.
our problem is communication with outside world and marketing,
not pld save-the-world-by-geeks approach.
[...]
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 01:27:56PM +0200, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
+1
+1
-1
-57
*2
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http
hi,
beagle main package contains beagled binary but all the configuration files
are in beagle-crawl-system package. is it a mistake or was it done on
purpose?
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 08:03:00PM +0100, Wojciech Błaszkowski wrote:
[...]
pldlinux.pl is only to protect PLD Linux mark.
pld-linux.pl or pldlinux.pl?
imho, adding pldlinux.* will generate more confusion.
can't we stick with pld-linux.*?
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:42:32AM +0100, Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 03:31:51AM +, wrobell wrote:
i am trying to install some packages in chroot using rpm
# rpm --root /home/new-sys -qa
gpg-pubkey-e64e7bf7-47b35206.(none)
# rpm
.
thanks for suggestions. indeed, rpm2cpio seems to be the best option, now.
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
box, thus the ignore{arch,os}
options.
any hints?
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
with that,
then just post here. there is always some anti-bash guru here ;)
Also, to ease starting OE development in PLD I was thinking of creating a
openembedded-essentials package which would at least depend on necessary
packages. Any comments?
just go ahead :)
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
is ok for now. if somebody needs all of them, then... vim-full?
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
is that i doubt that any of us writes scripts in *all*
above languages for vim. but if one really needs all of them, then
please create vim-lang-all (or something).
any comments?
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel
. We should have full vim with everything (X, python, perl, ruby,
brainfuck, you name it) and a vim-minimal for those, that want to have the
lightest version possible.
Agreed.
what's the current conclusion?
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
by default
IIRC this makes vim binary depend on python, ruby and tcl libraries.
Is it worth its profits?
imho it should be off by default. if one wants fat vim, then please create
vim-enahnced/vim-fat/whatever packages.
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:13:36AM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:28:52PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:58:06PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
[...]
What are the problems? The so called problems are the rare
situations where you need to grep
that are there just to help you in certain
situations.
grep -r
?
:)
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
, it was all discussed several times, so... eot? :)
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:07:01AM +0200, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [13-05-2007 23:22]:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:02:41PM +0200, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
[...]
We have tamed CVS over the years and know how to deal with its
shortcomings. The only real unsolved
version
because you sometimes get into trouble (experienced myself).
it's good thing.
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
-1.4.2-1, subversion-svnserve-1.4.2-1,
perl-subversion-1.4.2-1, python-subversion-1.4.2-1,
R apr-util-1.2.8-1, mysql-libs-5.0.27-3
Need to get 5.6MB of archives (4.2MB to download).
After unpacking 29.6MB will be used.
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld
:/
http://wiki.mozilla.org/XULRunner:Roadmap
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 02:46:09PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
what for? :)
guess :P
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 24 November 2006 19:36, wrobell wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 01:50:14PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
well. to use that patch you must first use version before
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 01:56:18AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Friday 27 October 2006 01:43, wrobell wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:55:37AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 02:30, wrobell wrote:
anyway back to topic, so it's kde bug it's not opening terminal
? gcj is enough? does it introduce java runtime
dependency?
[...]
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:55:37AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 02:30, wrobell wrote:
anyway back to topic, so it's kde bug it's not opening terminal (that
desktop file works ok if started from menu)?
it seems. in gnome menu it works perfectly
so, does
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:40:59PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 22:02, wrobell wrote:
proposition: remove MimeType=text/plain; from vim.desktop
because after fresh kde login the default view source application is vim
besides that i don't want it to be vim
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:56:09AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 01:39, wrobell wrote:
this works very nice for gnome...
do you actually need that text/plain binding? isn't start menu item
enough?
yes, i need. vim is best thing for editing and viewing
bytecode magic number (#1520864).
Therefore, please do not upgrade your Python related software on TH based
systems for few days till migration to Python 2.5 is finished.
Sorry for any inconvenience,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 14:12 +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:09:46AM +0200, wrobell wrote:
Author: wrobell Date: Fri Aug 25 09:09:46 2006 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- build with python 2.5, rel 1.11
1/08/2006 python 2.5 rc1 is planned to be released.
this day (or bit later) i would like to update python.spec (current
beta is on PYTHON_2_5 branch) and start upgrading th packages to use
python 2.5.
any requests? any notes?
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
20 ] echo works
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /bin/sh /bin/bash
pdksh-5.2.14-43
bash-3.1.017-1
32 bit unsigned int vs 32 bit signed int vs 64 bit long?
wrobell [EMAIL
of distro.
Just shoot questions. For sure they will be answered.
Regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:57 +0200, hawk wrote:
Author: hawk Date: Mon May 15 19:57:52 2006 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
[...]
+URL: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xulrunner/
404 not found
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
that this is the project, which galeon and
epiphany should be compiled against.
any comments?
[...]
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already.
Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge?
mozilla.spec
mozilla-firefox.spec
mozilla-thunderbird.spec
so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho
regards,
wrobell
xulrunner specs should be
reviewed/merged before using it for building other stuff.
what version of epiphany?
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld
Log message:
- we don't insert .py files into packages
We shoudln't avoid them in Th. I so often need to check py sources that
it's a
nightmare when not having them.
The same for C sources sometimes... so?
exactly, this was discussed long time ago. it is settled.
wrobell
into packages
We shoudln't avoid them in Th. I so often need to check py sources that
it's a nightmare when not having them.
put them into separate package.
.src.rpm
it was really discussed several years ago. please use
list archives... oopsss do we have pld.org.pl list archives? :]
wrobell
)
open(/usr/bin//usr/lib/p7zip/Formats,
O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
[...]
# rpm -q p7zip
p7zip-4.29-1
Mozesz podac architekture i testcase ?
please, this is english list.
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 20:05 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:04, wrobell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:03 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
you always need complete changelog?
But we don't build any
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:07 +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
and if you want complete changelog, you can always use cvsweb.
or cvs log at commandline :)
how this all relates to subversion repository and claims that
you always need complete changelog?
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
changelog. always.
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:07:53PM +0200, wrobell wrote:
Author: wrobell Date: Mon Apr 17 16:07:53 2006 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- build with firefox by default
- rel. 2
the reasons for above change:
- mozilla suite
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:57:19AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 13 April 2006 10:02, wrobell wrote:
[...]
2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it
on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then
it is sender
message.
and you are so brave to claim that no other person
will answer to yours? :)
cheers,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
on
the list about it.
of course, this is only a proposal. i think that such rules could
improve stability of system for testers. then, maybe we could
gain more people to test pld th.
regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
other way? installing emacs just to build info docs...
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/libgphoto2_port-0.mo
/usr/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES/libgphoto2_port-0.mo
/usr/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/libgphoto2_port-0.mo
Wrote: /home/users/wrobell/rpm/RPMS/libgphoto2-2.1.99-1.ppc.rpm
Wrote: /home
-s /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt
Why are those two files in /var/... when latex and pdflatex command search
for
them in /usr/...?
can you send me document which triggers problem (on priv, pls)?
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 12:44 +0100, Przemek Iskra wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:02:20AM +, wrobell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 23:12 +0100, Przemek Iskra wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:02:59PM +, wrobell wrote:
ppc 7450 is not going to be supported on th builders
ppc 7450 is not going to be supported on th builders.
in such situation rpm-morearchs patch should go on
some branch, doesn't it?
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org
it and when? imho, it should be done at once
some time ago.
best regards,
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 13:02 +, wrobell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:27 +, wrobell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:41 +0100, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, wrobell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:15 +0100, baggins wrote:
Author: baggins
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:27 +, wrobell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:41 +0100, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, wrobell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:15 +0100, baggins wrote:
Author: baggins Date: Wed Jan 18 18:15:12 2006 GMT
Module: SPECS
(1.37 - 1.38)
[...]
Name:multisync
Version: 0.83
i would switch to completly new opensync/multisync
from www.opensync.org or drop multisync 0.83 from ac.
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:41 +0100, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, wrobell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:15 +0100, baggins wrote:
Author: baggins Date: Wed Jan 18 18:15:12 2006 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message
$, $Date$
+%define short_name mhchem
+%define texhash [ ! -x %{_bindir}/texhash ] || %{_bindir}/texhash 12 ;
what about putting texhash macro in rpm macros?
[...]
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 19:13 +0100, freetz wrote:
Author: freetz Date: Mon Nov 28 18:13:41 2005 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- 0.9.2, dropped hal requirement (ankry uses rhythmbox on a 2.4.x box),
bcond hal?
[...]
wrobell
idea to add them?
what says fhs?
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
^^^
which is de facto the branch name... so, what's the problem?
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:53 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:03 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
Example: http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/rc-scripts
I want to keep only trunk, branches and _some_ tags, tell me how to do
it, and how
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:36 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 10:20 +0100, wrobell wrote:
- atomic commit (so we can commit patches and specs with one move
and revert it easily later if there is a need)
A propos
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:51 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:20:54AM +0100, wrobell wrote:
svn gives us some advantages. disadvantages? any real, which makes life
really painful?
How to resolve conflict? I've got a situation:
~: vi blabla
~: svn ci blabla
snv
it. chances are very, very small (as usual).
still we don't know what the problem is. maybe we should downgrade?
so... what's the problem?
wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org
it.
sending a problem description to authors it's not sufficient? should I
In case you didn't noticed, you commited into PLD cvs, not vte author's
one.
don't like my commits? feel free to report a abuse to PLD CDG.
come on.. fuck the system. we just want to know the problem :)
wrobell
95 matches
Mail list logo
