we use Products.EasyNewsletter in many projects as our preferred
newsletter solution but seems that the package development is a little
bit abandoned these days. I see there are some pull requests waiting
without response for many months and there has not been a release in
more than a year also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Héctor Velarde wrote:
> we use Products.EasyNewsletter in many projects as our preferred
> newsletter solution but seems that the package development is a
> little bit abandoned these days. I see there are some pull requests
> waiting without respon
I've once updated p4a.newsletter from Malthe Borch and renamed it to
collective.newsletter. there is no release yet, but you can get it here:
https://github.com/collective/collective.newsletter
the nice thing is, that it doesn't try to reinvent newsletter services
but uses Mailman, Sympa or any o
We are working on a more modular approach. We have a package called
multimail which allows you to create alias addresses to send to lists
of people. Then we use plomino or other to collect subscribers into
lists.
Then we just need something simpler to collect the content together
into emails and se
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
> https://github.com/collective/collective.newsletter
>
> the nice thing is, that it doesn't try to reinvent newsletter services
> but uses Mailman, Sympa or any other service.
Interesting. I wonder if there is a way to add list creation/re
Am 29.10.2013 20:03, schrieb Andreas Jung:
>
>
> Héctor Velarde wrote:
>> we use Products.EasyNewsletter in many projects as our preferred
>> newsletter solution but seems that the package development is a
>> little bit abandoned these days. I see there are some pull requests
>> waiting without
on the other side, are there any other packages to solve the newsletter use
> case?
>
> what are you using nowadays?
>
http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-to-code-html-emails
Developing newsletters? Never again.
-M
___
Product-Developers mailing list
p
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
>
> I've once updated p4a.newsletter from Malthe Borch and renamed it to
> collective.newsletter. there is no release yet, but you can get it here:
> https://github.com/collective/collective.newsletter
>
> the nice thing is, that it doesn't t
Hi,
Am 30.10.2013 10:19, schrieb Luca Fabbri:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
I've once updated p4a.newsletter from Malthe Borch and renamed it to
collective.newsletter. there is no release yet, but you can get it here:
https://github.com/collective/collective.newslette
On 29-10-2013 18:03, Johannes Raggam wrote:
I've once updated p4a.newsletter from Malthe Borch and renamed it to
collective.newsletter. there is no release yet, but you can get it here:
https://github.com/collective/collective.newsletter
HV> anything with "p4a" in its name gives me chills, no m
On 30-10-2013 04:51, Timo Stollenwerk wrote:
EasyNewsletter is just completely broken in my opinion (I tried to
refactor/fix some things and added some tests until I came to that
conclusion). I would not recommend to start using it.
HV> seems this time everybody agrees with Andreas :-)
good to
Well, I do not totally agree about collective.mailchimp as a valid
alternative to collective.ProductsEasyNewsletter.
Yes, MailChimp is the sate of the art regarding newsletters management
and clearly open source community is lacking such good product.
But it does not feet the needs of most of my c
On Mit, 2013-10-30 at 11:38 -0200, Héctor Velarde wrote:
> On 29-10-2013 18:03, Johannes Raggam wrote:
> > I've once updated p4a.newsletter from Malthe Borch and renamed it to
> > collective.newsletter. there is no release yet, but you can get it here:
> > https://github.com/collective/collective.
Hi,
On 30 October 2013 17:07, Gaël Pegliasco
wrote:
> Well, I do not totally agree about collective.mailchimp as a valid
> alternative to collective.ProductsEasyNewsletter.
> Yes, MailChimp is the sate of the art regarding newsletters management and
> clearly open source community is lacking su
On 10/30/13, 1:44 AM, Mikko Ohtamaa wrote:
on the other side, are there any other packages to solve the
newsletter use case?
what are you using nowadays?
http://kb.mailchimp.com/article/how-to-code-html-emails
Developing newsletters? Never again.
Not even once.
On Die, 2013-10-29 at 15:50 -0600, Sean Upton wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
> > https://github.com/collective/collective.newsletter
> >
> > the nice thing is, that it doesn't try to reinvent newsletter services
> > but uses Mailman, Sympa or any other service.
>
On 31/10/2013, at 3:23 AM, Mikko Ohtamaa
wrote:
Hi,
On 30 October 2013 17:07, Gaël Pegliasco
wrote:
> Well, I do not totally agree about collective.mailchimp as a valid
> alternative to collective.ProductsEasyNewsletter.
> Yes, MailChimp is the sate of the art regarding newsletters management
Am 30.10.2013 18:26, schrieb Johannes Raggam:
On Die, 2013-10-29 at 15:50 -0600, Sean Upton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
https://github.com/collective/collective.newsletter
the nice thing is, that it doesn't try to reinvent newsletter services
but uses Mailma
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Gaël Pegliasco
wrote:
> Well, I do not totally agree about collective.mailchimp as a valid
> alternative to collective.ProductsEasyNewsletter.
> Yes, MailChimp is the sate of the art regarding newsletters management and
> clearly open source community is lacking su
On 2013-10-30 20:01, Dylan Jay wrote:
>
>
> I also agree that we need internal solutions. Gov don't like paying for
> extra extra services and there are things singing and dancing can do
> that mailchimp can't like collect Plone content togeather and send it
> automatically.
>
Basically, what
On Die, 2013-11-05 at 14:31 +0100, Paul Roeland wrote:
> On 2013-10-30 20:01, Dylan Jay wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > I also agree that we need internal solutions. Gov don't like paying for
> > extra extra services and there are things singing and dancing can do
> > that mailchimp can't like collect Plo
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
>
> On Die, 2013-11-05 at 14:31 +0100, Paul Roeland wrote:
>> On 2013-10-30 20:01, Dylan Jay wrote:
>> >
>>
>> >
>> > I also agree that we need internal solutions. Gov don't like paying for
>> > extra extra services and there are things singin
On 05-11-2013 12:56, Luca Fabbri wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
Basically, what is needed is a 'newsletter' product that creates a HTML
mail, as solid as possible regarding css, and then sends that off to
*one* email address.
Thats exactly what collective.newsle
On 06/11/2013, at 12:31 AM, Paul Roeland wrote:
> On 2013-10-30 20:01, Dylan Jay wrote:
>
>>
>> I also agree that we need internal solutions. Gov don't like paying for
>> extra extra services and there are things singing and dancing can do
>> that mailchimp can't like collect Plone content togeat
On Die, 2013-11-05 at 14:34 -0200, Héctor Velarde wrote:
> On 05-11-2013 12:56, Luca Fabbri wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
> >>> Basically, what is needed is a 'newsletter' product that creates a HTML
> >>> mail, as solid as possible regarding css, and then sends
25 matches
Mail list logo
