I should have clarified my self here, I usually get that from something
that I
know is OK (NOT A BANK) if it were a bank I would run the other way. I did
get one from BofA one day, the web page was legit, they had messed up
something. I called them, they told me yes, to wait a bit that they were
wo
www.krebsonsecurity.com just posted a piece of vulnerabilities
in DVR cameras.
Personally I will not be joining the IoT.
I'm doing this from memory but, in the Mayan *Popol Vuh* (yes I have a copy
& I've read it)
the Maya are attacked
by their household goods; chairs, tables, pots, pans, etc. Wi
Cameras have to be powered somehow. Wired cameras get their power over the
cable, CAT5 or coax. Wireless cameras need either batteries or wall wart.
Murphy says camera battery will be dead when event occurs. Wall warts have
short cables which greatly limits camera placement. Cables for wired
camera
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Tom wrote:
> While I will not be recommending any HW beside R-Pi - here is my
> experience with the use of security cameras for similar purpose in the
> past:
> * If you want your recording actionable by PD - please talk to them
> first about what they need.
This nudges m
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Chuck Hast wrote:
> I use ZoneMinder as the DVR and I prefer wired cameras if you can run the
> cat5/6.
Chuck,
Running wire is a less favored route. Yes, more secure but has other
concerns such as a hole through the siding and inner wall and running the
cable to the switc
While I will not be recommending any HW beside R-Pi - here is my
experience with the use of security cameras for similar purpose in the
past:
* If you want your recording actionable by PD - please talk to them
first about what they need.
* If the image quality or camera placement is not good enough
A while ago, my area also had a series of car break-ins. And I was
thinking if there's a way to deploy drones to police the area automatically.
Just curious if anyone has thought about this possibility.
-v
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Chuck Hast wrote:
> I use ZoneMinder as the DVR and I
I use ZoneMinder as the DVR and I prefer wired cameras if you can run the
cat5/6. I have used wifi linked cams but never realy trusted them. If you go
wireless, I would go with a good product. I do NOT trust the memory cards
in
cameras, seen too many fail, and just when u need them. There is a lot
Thanks. Monit is exactly the kind of tool I need. Never know it existed
until you point it.
Thanks!
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Rich Shepard
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, VY wrote:
>
> > I am asking everyone -- if I want a very reliable Linux setup such as
> what
> > I described above, w
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Is such hardware and suitable linux software available? Recommendations
> and advice are needed.
A less expensive and highly reliable solution would be for me to mount a
trail camera (or two) outside and just exchange SD cards now and then.
Rich
A while ago someone exploded a small pipe bomb in my mailbox. While this
is the first incident of its type in the 24 years I've lived here past
performance is no guarantee of future behaviors. And, I have a couple of
vehicles parked outside (one in the driveway the other along the curb).
Neighbo
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Paul Mullen wrote:
> I've used reptyr with some sucess. If it's packaged for Slackware, it's
> worth a try.
Paul,
There is a SlackBuilds.org package for it. Thanks for the pointer.
> screen (and tmux) work just as well locally as they do on remote systems.
I'm sure.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:52:00PM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I looked at retty, but that runs on only 32-bit architecture, not
> 64-bit systems.
I've used reptyr with some sucess. If it's packaged for Slackware,
it's worth a try.
https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr
> I see references to runn
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I inadvertently closed a virtual terminal with a running process. The
> process is still running. Is there a way to display that running process
> in a new v.t.?
I looked at retty, but that runs on only 32-bit architecture, not 64-bit
systems. I see r
I inadvertently closed a virtual terminal with a running process. The
process is still running. Is there a way to display that running process in
a new v.t.?
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, VY wrote:
> I am asking everyone -- if I want a very reliable Linux setup such as what
> I described above, what are some of the considerations I should be
> thinking about?
> Any tip much appreciated! Thanks
man monit:
NAME
Monit - utility for monitoring service
Hello
I know my title is a bit odd. Below are the details and I may not be
titling this email
appropriately.
I am task to make a product that involves having a linux box that sits at
customer sites.
The linux box has sporadic internet access (I can get in if I need to but
access is towards minim
Negative!
It was an exercise as part of user awareness program effectiveness tests
for small financial institution.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:53 AM Michael Rasmussen
wrote:
> On 2017-03-13 10:48, Ishak Micheil wrote:
> > In most cases , we had to present a more familiar error messages with
> >
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> A man in the middle or a man in the browser attack would ask the right
> security questions. As soon as you provide the answers they'd put up some
> fake error page and then bleed your account.
It is interesting that starting last week I'm no lon
On 2017-03-13 10:48, Ishak Micheil wrote:
> In most cases , we had to present a more familiar error messages with
> the
> organization logo etc to delay victims escalation. More like having
> them
> "try again".
> That was an exercise btw!
We? You've been compromising bank access?
--
Mi
In most cases , we had to present a more familiar error messages with the
organization logo etc to delay victims escalation. More like having them
"try again".
That was an exercise btw!
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:44 AM Michael Rasmussen
wrote:
> On 2017-03-08 09:53, Rich Shepard wrote:
> > On W
On 2017-03-08 07:05, Chuck Hast wrote:
> Usually when I get that error with Chrome/Chromium, I go down to the
> advanced
> button and hit that, then you should get a button that tells it to
> accept
> the cert
Doing so with a financial institution is extremely ill advised.
I was tempted to say "
On 2017-03-08 09:53, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>> Look carefully. Our local morning TV news (SouthWest Missouri) about a
>> scam that had a very good visual imitation of the legitimate site.
>> What
>> warned the possible victim was looking carefully at the
23 matches
Mail list logo