Qt Designer can work with XML GUI descriptions, or Python. I like the Python
because I can use the GUI to generate the basic functionality and then build
it out directly in Python.
Richard
On Friday, January 24, 2014 21:43:59 Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 01/24/2014 09:23 PM, Richard Esplin wrote:
On 01/24/2014 09:23 PM, Richard Esplin wrote:
> PyQt3 was much more Pythonic, and I like PySide even more. And the GUI code
> generated by Qt Designer was very impressive--easy to read and modify. I have
> never dealt with such clean generated code with any other tool.
That's good. So you don't
PyQt3 was much more Pythonic, and I like PySide even more. And the GUI code
generated by Qt Designer was very impressive--easy to read and modify. I have
never dealt with such clean generated code with any other tool.
Richard
On Friday, January 24, 2014 17:53:53 Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 01/24
On 01/24/2014 06:14 PM, justin wrote:
> On Friday, January 24, 2014, Michael Torrie
> >
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> My question is, does it have a nice, functional, vim mode? And desert
>> color scheme (I use desert's basic colors for everything including
>> thunderbird e-mail!)? Honestly the thing that ke
On Friday, January 24, 2014, Michael Torrie
>
wrote:
>
>
> My question is, does it have a nice, functional, vim mode? And desert
> color scheme (I use desert's basic colors for everything including
> thunderbird e-mail!)? Honestly the thing that keeps me from using IDEs
> is often the lack of VIM
On 01/24/2014 04:14 PM, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
> I've done QT w/both C++ and python--but only using QT Designer.
> I must say, that QT with python is an amazing combination--even without a
> slick IDE the python bindings make it even easier than with C++.
I haven't used PyQt for a while (or PySide
I've done QT w/both C++ and python--but only using QT Designer.
I must say, that QT with python is an amazing combination--even without a
slick IDE the python bindings make it even easier than with C++.
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/optio
I can't think of anything nice about vi bindings, but it does appear to
have them.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:13 PM, John D Jones III wrote:
> On 01/24/14 11:29, Michael Torrie wrote:
>
>> On 01/24/2014 03:53 AM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
>>
>> is often the lack of VIM bindings. Without them I litte
On 01/24/14 11:29, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 01/24/2014 03:53 AM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
is often the lack of VIM bindings. Without them I litter my code with
colons, carets, dollar signs, o's, O's, gg's, GG's, dd's, yy's, etc. Sigh.
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscri
On 01/24/2014 03:53 AM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
> I'm just waiting for the other shoe to drop. Anyone else try it lately?
> Are there any caveats I ought to be aware of? Thanks!
Other than that it's C++, there are no caveats that I'm aware of.
Believe it or not Linux Torvalds and Dirk Hohndel (wel
So I was working on some code for a project written in QT and decided to
give QT-Creator a try.
This is the first time I've used this project in possibly 5 or 6 years.
All I can say is WOW I think I have a new favorite IDE.
I think going forward I'll be using it as my primary IDE when working on
C
11 matches
Mail list logo
